The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activity levels in the left hemisphere caudate–fusiform circuit predict how well a second language will be learned
Abstract
How second language (L2) learning is achieved in the human brain remains one of the fundamental questions of neuroscience and linguistics. Previous neuroimaging studies with bilinguals have consistently shown overlapping cortical organization of the native language (L1) and L2, leading to a prediction that a common neurobiological marker may be responsible for the development of the two languages. Here, by using functional MRI, we show that later skills to read in L2 are predicted by the activity level of the fusiform–caudate circuit in the left hemisphere, which nonetheless is not predictive of the ability to read in the native language. We scanned 10-y-old children while they performed a lexical decision task on L2 (and L1) stimuli. The subjects’ written language (reading) skills were behaviorally assessed twice, the first time just before we performed the fMRI scan (time 1 reading) and the second time 1 y later (time 2 reading). A whole-brain based analysis revealed that activity levels in left caudate and left fusiform gyrus correlated with L2 literacy skills at time 1. After controlling for the effects of time 1 reading and nonverbal IQ, or the effect of in-scanner lexical performance, the development in L2 literacy skills (time 2 reading) was also predicted by activity in left caudate and fusiform regions that are thought to mediate language control functions and resolve competition arising from L1 during L2 learning. Our findings suggest that the activity level of left caudate and fusiform regions serves as an important neurobiological marker for predicting accomplishment in reading skills in a new language.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the researchers demonstrated through fMRI that bilingual learners' later skills in L2 reading can be predicted by the activation level of the fusiform-caudate circuit in the participants' left hemisphere over a one-year span.”
From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Tan et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“This finding thus suggests that the activity level of these brain regions serves as an important neurobiological marker for predicting FL aptitude in the area of L2 reading.”
From Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow (2017) · cites this paper as Tan et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system
GREEN, D. W. (1998) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728998000133 · Cited by 2,807
Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4
Reynolds, J. H., Chelazzi, L., & Desimone, R. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-05-01736.1999 · Cited by 1,236
Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign language comprehension
Thierry, G., & Wu, Y. J. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0609927104 · Cited by 728
Dyslexia: A New Synergy Between Education and Cognitive Neuroscience
Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1171999 · Cited by 525
Chee, M. W. L., Weekes, B., Lee, K. M., Soon, C. S., Schreiber, A., Hoon, J. J., & Chee, M. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0631 · Cited by 227
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Wei Li, A user-friendly linguistics. Int J Appl Linguist 17, 1–3 (2007).
- 10.1006/brln.1999.2186 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.20255 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.10089 · DOI
- 10.1196/annals.1416.000 · DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/041) · DOI
- 10.1016/S0730-725X(01)00379-4 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001756-200505120-00021 · DOI
- Wei Li Bilingualism and Multilingualism: Critical Concepts in Linguistics (Routledge, London, 2009).
- 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00357.x · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/122.12.2221 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1127761 · DOI
- MT Ullman, A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: the declarative/procedural model. Mind and Context in Adult Second Language Acquisition: Methods, Theory, and Practice, ed C Sanz (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC), pp. 141–178
- 10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
- JF Kroll, AMB de Groot Handbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (Oxford Univ Press, New York, 2005).
- 10.1162/jocn.2008.20011 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02865 · DOI
- 10.1001/archneur.1997.00550170042013 · DOI
- CA Perfetti, The representation problem in reading acquisition. Reading Acquisition, eds PB Gough, LC Ehri, R Treiman (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), pp. 145–174 (1992).
- 10.1080/10888430701530730 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/scan/nsp011 · DOI
- 10.1162/jocn.2009.21352 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/hbm.20174 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.20098 · DOI
- J Abutalebi, A Miozzo, SF Cappa, Do subcortical structures control “language selection” in polyglots? Evidence from pathological language mixing. Neurocase 6, 51–56 (2000).
- 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.282.5386.108 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn1501 · DOI
- 10.1037/0735-7044.121.3.602 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511620744 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1195067 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/brln.1995.1014 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.57.1.121 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X00015491 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70495-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.yebeh.2006.04.005 · DOI
- J Talairach, P Tournoux Co-Planar Stereotactic Atlas of the Human Brain (Theime Medical, New York, 1988).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foreign language aptitude theory: Yesterday, today and tomorrow
Wen, Z. (., Biedroń, A., & Skehan, P. (2017) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000276 · Cited by 248
Iaccarino, L., Crespi, C., Della Rosa, P. A., Catricalà, E., Guidi, L., Marcone, A., Tagliavini, F., Magnani, G., Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120197 · Cited by 56
Radulescu, E., Minati, L., Ganeshan, B., Harrison, N. A., Gray, M. A., Beacher, F. D. C. C., Chatwin, C., Young, R. C. D., & Critchley, H. D. (2013) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.05.010 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, L. H., Chen, L., Yip, V., Chan, A. H. D., Yang, J., Gao, J.-H., & Siok, W. T.
- Affiliations
- State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and
- Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research and State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
- Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China; and
- Department of Radiology and Brain Research Imaging Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-01-24
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2540-2544
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review