Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 702

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

LGP2 is a positive regulator of RIG-I– and MDA5-mediated antiviral responses

Open access
Satoh, Takashi, Kato, Hiroki, Kumagai, Yutaro, Yoneyama, Mitsutoshi, Sato, Shintaro, Matsushita, Kazufumi, Tsujimura, Tohru, Fujita, Takashi, Akira, Shizuo, Takeuchi, Osamu·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

RNA virus infection is recognized by retinoic acid-inducible gene (RIG)-I–like receptors (RLRs), RIG-I, and melanoma differentiation–associated gene 5 (MDA5) in the cytoplasm. RLRs are comprised of N-terminal caspase-recruitment domains (CARDs) and a DExD/H-box helicase domain. The third member of the RLR family, LGP2, lacks any CARDs and was originally identified as a negative regulator of RLR signaling. In the present study, we generated mice lacking LGP2 and found that LGP2 was required for RIG-I– and MDA5-mediated antiviral responses. In particular, LGP2 was essential for type I IFN production in response to picornaviridae infection. Overexpression of the CARDs from RIG-I and MDA5 in Lgp2 −/− fibroblasts activated the IFN-β promoter, suggesting that LGP2 acts upstream of RIG-I and MDA5. We further examined the role of the LGP2 helicase domain by generating mice harboring a point mutation of Lys-30 to Ala ( Lgp2 K30A/K30A ) that abrogated the LGP2 ATPase activity. Lgp2 K30A/K30A dendritic cells showed impaired IFN-β productions in response to various RNA viruses to extents similar to those of Lgp2 −/− cells. Lgp2 −/− and Lgp2 K30A/K30A mice were highly susceptible to encephalomyocarditis virus infection. Nevertheless, LGP2 and its ATPase activity were dispensable for the responses to synthetic RNA ligands for MDA5 and RIG-I. Taken together, the present data suggest that LGP2 facilitates viral RNA recognition by RIG-I and MDA5 through its ATPase domain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0912986107

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 702

Metadata

Authors
Satoh, T., Kato, H., Kumagai, Y., Yoneyama, M., Sato, S., Matsushita, K., Tsujimura, T., Fujita, T., Akira, S., & Takeuchi, O.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-01-08
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
1512-1517
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2136329789
Cited by
702
References
6
FWCI
24.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: LGP2 is a positive regulator of RIG-I– and MDA5-mediated antiviral responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0912986107
The paper
Satoh, T., Kato, H., Kumagai, Y., Yoneyama, M., Sato, S., Matsushita, K., Tsujimura, T., Fujita, T., Akira, S., & Takeuchi, O. (2010). LGP2 is a positive regulator of RIG-I– and MDA5-mediated antiviral responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912986107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.