The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Origin and formation of the first two distinct cell types of the inner cell mass in the mouse embryo
Open accessAbstract
A crucial question in mammalian development is how cells of the early embryo differentiate into distinct cell types. The first decision is taken when cells undertake waves of asymmetric division that generate one daughter on the inside and one on the outside of the embryo. After this division, some cells on the inside remain pluripotent and give rise to the epiblast, and hence the future body, whereas others develop into the primitive endoderm, an extraembryonic tissue. How the fate of these inside cells is decided is unknown: Is the process random, or is it related to their developmental origins? To address this question, we traced all cells by live-cell imaging in intact, unmanipulated embryos until the epiblast and primitive endoderm became distinct. This analysis revealed that inner cell mass (ICM) cells have unrestricted developmental potential. However, cells internalized by the first wave of asymmetric divisions are biased toward forming pluripotent epiblast, whereas cells internalized in the next two waves of divisions are strongly biased toward forming primitive endoderm. Moreover, we show that cells internalized by the second wave up-regulate expression of Gata6 and Sox17, and changing the expression of these genes determines whether the cells become primitive endoderm. Finally, with our ability to determine the origin of cells, we find that inside cells that are mispositioned when they are born can sort into the correct layer. In conclusion, we propose a model in which the timing of cell internalization, cell position, and cell sorting combine to determine distinct lineages of the preimplantation mouse embryo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chazaud, C., Yamanaka, Y., Pawson, T., & Rossant, J. (2006) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2006.02.020 · Cited by 898
Depletion of definitive gut endoderm in Sox17 -null mutant mice
Kanai-Azuma, M., Kanai, Y., Gad, J. M., Tajima, Y., Taya, C., Kurohmaru, M., Sanai, Y., Yonekawa, H., Yazaki, K., Tam, P. P. L., et al. (2002) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.129.10.2367 · Cited by 704
Kwon, G. S., Viotti, M., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2008) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.07.017 · Cited by 402
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90502-X · DOI · Paper page
- P Barlow, DAJ Owen, CF Graham, DNA synthesis in the preimplantation mouse embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol 27, 431–445 (1972).
- 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90327-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0012-1606(87)90055-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/dev.100.4.685 · DOI
- RL Gardner, Investigation of cell lineage and differentiation in the extraembryonic endoderm of the mouse embryo. J Embryol Exp Morphol 68, 175–198 (1982).
- 10.1098/rstb.2003.1329 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.04.036 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.021519 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1138591 · DOI
- M Bischoff, DE Parfitt, M Zernicka-Goetz, Formation of the embryonic-abembryonic axis of the mouse blastocyst: Relationships between orientation of early cleavage divisions and pattern of symmetric/asymmetric divisions. Deelopmentv 135, 953–962 (2008).
- 10.1002/dvg.20203 · DOI
- AJ Copp, Interaction between inner cell mass and trophectoderm of the mouse blastocyst. I. A study of cellular proliferation. J Embryol Exp Morphol 48, 109–125 (1978).
- 10.1007/BF00375893 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1242/dev.126.24.5591 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-213X-7-96 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00404-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/dbio.2002.0810 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.10.048 · DOI
- 10.1242/jcs.007856 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1440-169X.2008.01056.x · DOI
- 10.1101/gad.486108 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/gad.1833510 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Heterogeneity in Oct4 and Sox2 Targets Biases Cell Fate in 4-Cell Mouse Embryos
Goolam, M., Scialdone, A., Graham, S. J. L., Macaulay, I. C., Jedrusik, A., Hupalowska, A., Voet, T., Marioni, J. C., & Zernicka-Goetz, M. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.047 · Cited by 484
Self-citationSelf-Organizing Properties of Mouse Pluripotent Cells Initiate Morphogenesis upon Implantation
Bedzhov, I., & Zernicka-Goetz, M. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.023 · Cited by 448
Self-citationLineage specification in the mouse preimplantation embryo
Chazaud, C., & Yamanaka, Y. (2016) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.128314 · Cited by 317
Ohnishi, Y., Huber, W., Tsumura, A., Kang, M., Xenopoulos, P., Kurimoto, K., Oleś, A. K., Araúzo-Bravo, M. J., Saitou, M., Hadjantonakis, A.-K., et al. (2014) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2881 · Cited by 300
Kang, M., Piliszek, A., Artus, J., & Hadjantonakis, A.-K. (2013) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.084996 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, S. A., Teo, R. T. Y., Li, H., Robson, P., Glover, D. M., & Zernicka-Goetz, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-03-22
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 6364-6369
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2127375899
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Origin and formation of the first two distinct cell types of the inner cell mass in the mouse embryo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.0915063107
- The paper
- Morris, S. A., Teo, R. T. Y., Li, H., Robson, P., Glover, D. M., & Zernicka-Goetz, M. (2010). Origin and formation of the first two distinct cell types of the inner cell mass in the mouse embryo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0915063107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.