The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Longitudinal shift in diabetic wound microbiota correlates with prolonged skin defense response
Open accessAbstract
Diabetics frequently suffer from chronic, nonhealing wounds. Although bacterial colonization and/or infection are generally acknowledged to negatively impact wound healing, the precise relationship between the microbial community and impaired wound healing remains unclear. Because the host cutaneous defense response is proposed to play a key role in modulating microbial colonization, we longitudinally examined the diabetic wound microbiome in tandem with host tissue gene expression. By sequencing 16S ribosomal RNA genes, we show that a longitudinal selective shift in wound microbiota coincides with impaired healing in diabetic mice ( Lepr db/db ; db/db). We demonstrate a parallel shift in longitudinal gene expression that occurs in a cluster of genes related to the immune response. Further, we establish a correlation between relative abundance of Staphylococcus spp. and the expression of cutaneous defense response genes. Our data demonstrate that integrating two types of global datasets lends a better understanding to the dynamics governing host–microbe interactions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Aging or underlying diseases, such as diabetes, may also contribute to changes in skin microbiota, as shown recently in diabetic mice (171), and we do not yet know how these changes influence healing.”
From Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation (2014) · cites this paper as [171]
Citations
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Topographical and Temporal Diversity of the Human Skin Microbiome
Grice, E. A., Kong, H. H., Conlan, S., Deming, C. B., Davis, J., Young, A. C., Program, N. C. S., Bouffard, G. G., Blakesley, R. W., Murray, P. R., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1171700 · Cited by 2,953
Self-citationWound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot
Falanga, V. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67700-8 · Cited by 2,715
Schloss, P. D., & Handelsman, J. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.3.1501-1506.2005 · Cited by 2,529
Inflammation in Wound Repair: Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms
Eming, S. A., Krieg, T., & Davidson, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/sj.jid.5700701 · Cited by 2,429
Chen, H., Charlat, O., Tartaglia, L. A., Woolf, E. A., Weng, X., Ellis, S. J., Lakey, N. D., Culpepper, J., More, K. J., Breitbart, R. E., et al. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81294-5 · Cited by 2,214
The NIH Human Microbiome ProjectPreprint
The NIH HMP Working Group, Peterson, J. L., Garges, S., Giovanni, M. Y., McInnes, P., Wang, L., Schloss, J. A., Bonazzi, V. R., McEwen, J. E., Wetterstrand, K. A., et al. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.096651.109 · Cited by 2,168
Wound Microbiology and Associated Approaches to Wound Management
Bowler, P. G., Duerden, B. I., & Armstrong, D. G. (2001) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.14.2.244-269.2001 · Cited by 2,112
STEM: a tool for the analysis of short time series gene expression data
Ernst, J., & Bar-Joseph, Z. (2006) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-191 · Cited by 1,703
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wound repair and regeneration: Mechanisms, signaling, and translation
Eming, S. A., Martin, P., & Tomic-Canic, M. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337 · Cited by 3,562
The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease
Cho, I., & Blaser, M. J. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3182 · Cited by 3,449
Grice, E. A., & Segre, J. A. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2537 · Cited by 3,143
Self-citationWound Healing: A Cellular Perspective
Rodrigues, M., Kosaric, N., Bonham, C. A., & Gurtner, G. C. (2018) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00067.2017 · Cited by 3,211
Epithelialization in Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Review
Pastar, I., Stojadinović, O., Yin, N. C., Ramirez, H. A., Nusbaum, A. G., Sawaya, A. P., Patel, S. B., Khalid, L., Isseroff, R. R., & Tomic‐Canic, M. (2014) · Advances in Wound Care · doi:10.1089/wound.2013.0473 · Cited by 1,604
Metadata
- Authors
- Grice, E. A., Snitkin, E. S., Yockey, L. J., Bermudez, D. M., Program, N. C. S., Liechty, K. W., Segre, J. A., Mullikin, J., Blakesley, R., Young, A., Chu, G., Ramsahoye, C., Lovett, S., Han, J., Legaspi, R., Fuksenko, T., Reddix-Dugue, N., Sison, C., Gregory, M., Montemayor, C., Gestole, M., Hargrove, A., Johnson, T., Myrick, J., Riebow, N., Schmidt, B., Novotny, B., Gupti, J., Benjamin, B., Brooks, S., Coleman, H., Ho, S.-L., Schandler, K., Smith, L., Stantripop, M., Maduro, Q., Bouffard, G., Dekhtyar, M., Guan, X., Masiello, C., Maskeri, B., McDowell, J., Park, M., & Jacques Thomas, P.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
- Genetics and Molecular Biology Branch and
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-07-28
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 14799-14804
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2930465
- OpenAlex
- W2057107436
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2010-09-24)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DP2DK083085, 7DP2DK083085-02., R56DK080672)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Wound Healing and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Keywords
- diabetic wound healing, wound microbiota, chronic wounds, host-microbe interactions, immune gene expression, Staphylococcus, type 2 diabetes, db/db mice, bacterial colonization, 16S rRNA gene sequencing
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteria, Bacterial Infections, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Molecular Sequence Data, Population Dynamics, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Skin, Staphylococcus, Time Factors, Wound Healing, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Mice, Knockout, Gene Expression Profiling, Biodiversity, Mice, Receptors, Leptin, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Metagenome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
