Cited by 146Carbon Nanotubes in CompositesLuminescence and Fluorescent MaterialsAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

Peptide secondary structure modulates single-walled carbon nanotube fluorescence as a chaperone sensor for nitroaromatics

Open access
Heller, Daniel A., Pratt, George W., Zhang, Jingqing, Nair, Nitish, Hansborough, Adam J., Boghossian, Ardemis A., Reuel, Nigel F., Barone, Paul W. +1 more·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

A class of peptides from the bombolitin family, not previously identified for nitroaromatic recognition, allows near-infrared fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotubes to transduce specific changes in their conformation. In response to the binding of specific nitroaromatic species, such peptide–nanotube complexes form a virtual “chaperone sensor,” which reports modulation of the peptide secondary structure via changes in single-walled carbon nanotubes, near-infrared photoluminescence. A split-channel microscope constructed to image quantized spectral wavelength shifts in real time, in response to nitroaromatic adsorption, results in the first single-nanotube imaging of solvatochromic events. The described indirect detection mechanism, as well as an additional exciton quenching-based optical nitroaromatic detection method, illustrate that functionalization of the carbon nanotube surface can result in completely unique sites for recognition, resolvable at the single-molecule level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1005512108

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fluorescence modulation of single-walled carbon nanotubes is caused by several mechanisms, including Fermi level shifting through modulation of the immediate redox environment, exciton disruption in response to binding events, and solvatochromic shifting due to perturbation of the local dielectric environment.

    “The fluorescence modulation of SWCNTs is caused by several mechanisms, including Fermi level shifting through modulation of the immediate redox environment and exciton disruption in response to binding events, which change SWCNT intensity, and solvatochromic (wavelength) shifting due to perturbation of the local dielectric environment, including shifts due to modulation of the local electrostatic”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Cognet L, et al. Stepwise quenching of exciton fluorescence in carbon nanotubes by single-molecule reactions. Science. 2007;316:1465–1468. doi: 10.1126/science.1141316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heller, D. A., Pratt, G. W., Zhang, J., Nair, N., Hansborough, A. J., Boghossian, A. A., Reuel, N. F., Barone, P. W., & Strano, M. S.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-05-09
Volume
108
Issue
21
Pages
8544-8549
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2056525779
Cited by
146
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50gm068762-10)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 68762, P50-GM068762)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Keywords
single-walled carbon nanotubes, peptide secondary structure, nitroaromatic compounds, near-infrared fluorescence, solvatochromism, exciton quenching, nanotube functionalization, chemical sensing
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Fluorescence, Hydrocarbons, Aromatic, Microscopy, Nitro Compounds, Peptides, Protein Structure, Secondary, Molecular Chaperones, Nanotubes, Carbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review