The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phonological decisions require both the left and right supramarginal gyri
Open accessAbstract
Recent functional imaging studies demonstrated that both the left and right supramarginal gyri (SMG) are activated when healthy right-handed subjects make phonological word decisions. However, lesion studies typically report difficulties with phonological processing after left rather than right hemisphere damage. Here, we used a unique dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) approach to test whether the SMG in the right hemisphere contributes to modality-independent (i.e., auditory and visual) phonological decisions. To test task-specificity, we compared the effect of real or sham TMS during phonological, semantic, and perceptual decisions. To test laterality and anatomical specificity, we compared the effect of TMS over the left, right, or bilateral SMG and angular gyri. The accuracy and reaction times of phonological decisions were selectively disrupted relative to semantic and perceptual decisions when real TMS was applied over the left, right, or bilateral SMG. These effects were not observed for TMS over the angular gyri. A follow-up experiment indicated that the threshold-intensity for inducing a disruptive effect on phonological decisions was identical for unilateral TMS over the right or left SMG. Taken together, these findings provide converging evidence that the right SMG contributes to accurate and efficient phonological decisions in the healthy brain, with no evidence that the left and right SMG can compensate for one another during TMS. Our findings motivate detailed studies of phonological processing in patients with acute or long-term damage of the right SMG.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“We believe these results are a product of using an active baseline condition during data acquisition (Stark and Squire, 2001) and may reflect the role of the supramarginal gyrus during arithmetic, language, and phonological processing tasks (Hartwigsen et al., 2010; Evans et al., 2016).”
From Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice (2021) · cites this paper as Hartwigsen et al., 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex.
Kujirai, T., Caramia, M. D., Rothwell, J. C., Day, B. L., Thompson, P. D., Ferbert, A., Wroe, S. J., Asselman, P., & MARSDEN, C. D. (1993) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019912 · Cited by 3,132
Wassermann, E. M. (1998) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00096-8 · Cited by 2,337
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011 · Cited by 2,212
Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex.
Ferbert, A., Priori, A., Rothwell, J. C., Day, B. L., Colebatch, J. G., & MARSDEN, C. D. (1992) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019243 · Cited by 1,490
The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009
Price, C. J. (2010) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05444.x · Cited by 1,387
Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology
Kobayashi, M., & Pascual‐Leone, Á. (2003) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00321-1 · Cited by 1,299
Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke
Saur, D. (2006) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awl090 · Cited by 1,078
Mayka, M. A., Corcos, D. M., Leurgans, S. E., & Vaillancourt, D. E. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.004 · Cited by 731
Devlin, J. T., Matthews, P. M., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903321107837 · Cited by 577
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bergmann, T. O., Karabanov, A. N., Hartwigsen, G., Thielscher, A., & Siebner, H. R. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.012 · Cited by 359
“When focal online TMS disrupts task performance, one can determine the individual intensity threshold for inducing a perturbation (Hartwigsen et al., 2010).”
Ueno, T., Saito, S., Rogers, T. T., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.013 · Cited by 326
“…passes through and connects to the inferior supramarginal gyrus (iSMGSMG) (Parker et al., 2005; M.A.L.R. et al., unpublished data), which plays a critical role in human phonological processing (Hartwigsen et al., 2010) and acts as a sound-motor interface in primates (Rauschecker and Scott, 2009).”
Resting functional connectivity of language networks: characterization and reproducibility
Tomasi, D. G., & Volkow, N. D. (2012) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2011.177 · Cited by 285
Inferring Causality from Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Cognitive Neuroscience
Bergmann, T. O., & Hartwigsen, G. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01591 · Cited by 271
Fusion and Fission of Cognitive Functions in the Human Parietal Cortex
Humphreys, G. F., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu198 · Cited by 265
“…literature — though the more clearly bilateral nature of attention (than phonology) may itself generate behavioral differences in unilateral patients (one might expect performance on bottom-up attention tasks to be more robust due to bilateral involvement, though see Hartwigsen et al. 2010).”
The dorsal stream contribution to phonological retrieval in object naming
Schwartz, M. F., Faseyitan, O. K., Kim, J., & Coslett, H. B. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws300 · Cited by 260
“, 2012) and functional neuroimaging studies frequently reveal supramarginal gyrus activation in association with speech production and phonological processing (Shuster and Lemieux, 2005; Moser et al., 2009; Fridriksson et al., 2010; Hartwigsen et al., 2010).”
BackgroundDeschamps, I., Baum, S. R., & Gracco, V. L. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.015 · Cited by 228
Jackson, R. L., Hoffman, P., Pobric, G., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2999-15.2016 · Cited by 210
“These areas are crucial for receptive and expressive language, particularly phonology and articulation, and are consistently included in traditional and modern models of language (Eggert, 1977; Berker et al., 1986; Hickok and Poeppel, 2004; Indefrey and Levelt, 2004; Vigneau et al., 2006; Hickok and Poeppel, 2007; Hic…”
BackgroundButler, R. A., Ralph, M. A. L., & Woollams, A. M. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awu286 · Cited by 200
“…by functional MRI or repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation studies (Dronkers, 1996; Vigneau et al., 2006; Rauschecker and Scott, 2009; Hartwigsen et al., 2010; Price, 2010), and also in controlled semantic processing by functional MRI, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and…”
BackgroundSeither‐Preisler, A., Parncutt, R., & Schneider, P. T. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5315-13.2014 · Cited by 183
“…patterns seen in musically experienced and AD(H)D children suggest that musical activities may be beneficial not only for auditory (Kraus and Chandrasekaran, 2010) but also for attentional, linguistic, and literacy skills (Golestani et al., 2007; Wong et al., 2008; Hartwigsen et al., 2010).”
BackgroundHartwigsen, G., Saur, D., Price, C. J., Ulmer, S., Baumgaertner, A., & Siebner, H. R. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1310190110 · Cited by 152
“We have determined the individual intensity threshold for inducing a virtual lesion effect in a previous study with application of rTMS during a language task (17).”
MethodMaldonado, I. L., Moritz-Gasser, S., & Duffau, H. (2011) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-011-0309-x · Cited by 161
“Recent evidences with transcranial magnetic cerebral stimulation demonstrated that accuracy and reaction times of phonological (not semantic, not perceptual) decisions may be selectively disrupted if stimulation is applied to the left, right, or bilateral SMG ( Hartwigsen et al. 2010 ).”
BackgroundBorn with an Ear for Dialects? Structural Plasticity in the Expert Phonetician Brain
Golestani, N., Price, C. J., & Scott, S. K. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3891-10.2011 · Cited by 112
“…pars opercularis) and the left supramarginal gyrus are involved in and even necessary for phonological processing and for subvocal rehearsal in verbal working memory (Paulesu et al., 1993; Zatorre et al., 1996; Burton et al., 2000; Nixon et al., 2004; Gough et al., 2005; Hartwigsen et al., 2010).”
BackgroundWhite matter maturation profiles through early childhood predict general cognitive ability
Deoni, S. C. L., O’Muircheartaigh, J., Elison, J. T., Walker, L., Doernberg, E., Waskiewicz, N., Dirks, H., Piryatinsky, I., Dean, D. C., & Jumbe, N. L. (2016) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0947-x · Cited by 147
“2003), lesion and more recent TMS studies suggest the right supramarginal gyrus plays an important role in phonological processing (Hartwigsen et al. 2010).”
BackgroundHenseler, I., Regenbrecht, F., & Obrig, H. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awt374 · Cited by 148
“The latter study showed that inhibition of the supramarginal gyrus interferes with performance in a phonological task (Hartwigsen et al., 2010).”
BackgroundBeynel, L., Appelbaum, L. G., Luber, B. M., Crowell, C. A., Hilbig, S. A., Lim, W., Nguyên, D. T., Chrapliwy, N. A., Davis, S. W., Cabeza, R. E. L., et al. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.018 · Cited by 125
Right hemisphere grey matter structure and language outcomes in chronic left hemisphere stroke
Xing, S., Lacey, E. H., Skipper‐Kallal, L. M., Jiang, X., Harris-Love, M. L., Zeng, J., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2015) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awv323 · Cited by 131
Gauvin, H. S., Baene, W. D., Braß, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.037 · Cited by 124
“The supramarginal gyrus is involved in phonological perception and decision making (Hartwigsen et al. 2010; AC C EP TE D M AN U SC R IP T Buchsbaum et al. 2008; McDermott et al. 2003; Price et al. 1997) although it typically does not show up in speech comprehension tasks (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007;…”
Early and Sustained Supramarginal Gyrus Contributions to Phonological Processing
Sliwinska, M. W., Khadilkar, M., Campbell-Ratcliffe, J., Quevenco, F. C., & Devlin, J. T. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00161 · Cited by 126
Angular default mode network connectivity across working memory load
Vatansever, D., Manktelow, A. E., Sahakian, B. J., Menon, D. K., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23341 · Cited by 120
“On the other hand, the supramarginal gyrus has been shown to activate in phonological decision making (Hartwigsen et al., 2010) and is thought to be a part of the phonological store and the articulatory rehearsal system, aided by the precentral gyrus and the supplementary motor areas (Chen and…”
BackgroundNeurobiology of Language Recovery After Stroke: Lessons From Neuroimaging Studies
Saur, D., & Hartwigsen, G. (2011) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.036 · Cited by 125
“In contrast, other studies found a deterioration in task performance after both left- or right-hemisphere TMS in some patients with brain lesions of the left hemisphere(94,95) or in healthy subjects.(96,97) In a someow complementary approach, another recent study aimed to ncrease cortical excitability in perilesional…”
ResultIs the Sensorimotor Cortex Relevant for Speech Perception and Understanding? An Integrative Review
Henningsen‐Schomers, M. R., & Friedemann Pulvermüller, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00435 · Cited by 125
Hartwigsen, G., Weigel, A., Schuschan, P., Siebner, H. R., Weise, D., Claßen, J., & Saur, D. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv092 · Cited by 111
Decoding the Neuroanatomical Basis of Reading Ability: A Multivoxel Morphometric Study
He, Q., Xue, G., Chen, C., Chen, C., Lu, Z., & Dong, Q. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0449-13.2013 · Cited by 115
“Transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the SMG could selectively disrupt phonological decoding (Hartwig- sen et al., 2010).”
Krieg, S. M., Tarapore, P. E., Picht, T., Tanigawa, N., Houde, J. F., Sollmann, N., Meyer, B., Vajkoczy, P., Berger, M. S., Ringel, F. A., et al. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.016 · Cited by 110
“…to the visual word presentation onset was applied to the predefined stimulation points in SMG, phonological judgments were reliably delayed (Hartwigsen et al., 2010; Romero et al., 2006; Sliwinska et al., 2012; Stoeckel et al., 2009),whereas semantic judgments were facilitated (Harpaz et…”
Cargnelutti, E., Tomasino, B., & Fabbro, F. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00154 · Cited by 108
Hartwigsen, G. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.007 · Cited by 90
Ambrus, G. G., Vékony, T., Janacsek, K., Trimborn, A. B. C., Kovács, G., & Németh, D. (2020) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104144 · Cited by 97
Organization and evolution of parieto-frontal processing streams in macaque monkeys and humans
Caminiti, R., Innocenti, G. M., & Battaglia‐Mayer, A. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.014 · Cited by 97
Heitzeg, M. M., Cope, L. M., Martz, M. E., & Hardee, J. E. (2015) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-015-0048-9 · Cited by 103
Ruschel, M., Knösche, T. R., Friederici, A. D., Turner, R., Geyer, S., & Anwander, A. (2013) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht098 · Cited by 95
Inferior Parietal Lobule Contributions to Visual Word Recognition
Sliwinska, M. W., James, A., & Devlin, J. T. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00721 · Cited by 90
“These findings are consistent with previous studies that found TMS of SMG increased response times across a range of phonological tasks including initial sound similarity, stress assignment in multi-syllable words, and digit span (Romero, Walsh, & Papagno, 2006), syllable counting (Hartwigsen et al., 2010), and audito…”
ResultKim, S. Y., Qi, T., Feng, X., Ding, G., Liu, L., & Cao, F. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.068 · Cited by 93
Sensorimotor integration for speech motor learning involves the inferior parietal cortex
Shum, M., Shiller, D. M., Baum, S. R., & Gracco, V. L. (2011) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07889.x · Cited by 99
Heinzel, S., Metzger, F. G., Ehlis, A., Korell, R., Alboji, A., Haeussinger, F. B., Hagen, K., Maetzler, W., Eschweiler, G. W., Berg, D., et al. (2012) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.05.021 · Cited by 100
“Moreover, the role of the bilateral supramarginal gyri for phonological decisions (Hartwigsen et al., 2010) suggests increased activity within this region to represent a compensation mechanism specifically involving language-related processing.”
Alyahya, R. S. W., Halai, A. D., Conroy, P., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa074 · Cited by 92
“Findings from this study provide converging evidence with previous lesion mapping studies (Fridriksson et al., 2010; Hartwigsen et al., 2010; Schwartz et al., 2012; Kümmerer et al., 2013; Butler et al., 2014; Halai et al., 2017) and prominent models of language processing (Hickok and Poeppel, 2004; Saur et al.”
ResultReal-time effects of centrotemporal spikes on cognition in rolandic epilepsy
Xiao, F., An, D., Lei, D., Li, L., Chen, S., Wu, X., Yang, T., Ren, J., Gong, Q., & Zhou, D. (2016) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000002358 · Cited by 85
How right hemisphere damage after stroke can impair speech comprehension
Gajardo‐Vidal, A., Lorca‐Puls, D. L., Hope, T. M. H., Jones, Ō. P., Seghier, M. L., Prejawa, S., Crinion, J., Leff, A. P., Green, D. W., & Price, C. J. (2018) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awy270 · Cited by 91
Neural correlates of fixation duration in natural reading: Evidence from fixation-related fMRI
Henderson, J. M., Choi, W., Luke, S. G., & Desai, R. H. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.072 · Cited by 91
Jednoróg, K., Marchewka, A., Altarelli, I., Lopez, A. K. M., van Ermingen‐Marbach, M., Grande, M., Grabowska, A., Heim, S., & Ramus, F. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22734 · Cited by 82
“In the same line, transcranial magnetic stimulation applied over the SMG selectively disrupts phonological decoding [Hartwigsen et al., 2010].”
Simonyan, K., & Fuertinger, S. (2015) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00964.2014 · Cited by 83
“…and language-related control, including speech motor learning, sensorimotor adaptation, phonological processing and decisions, monitoring the onset of speech, and recognizing and responding to auditory errors (Hartwigsen et al. 2010; Hickok and Poeppel 2007; Kort et al. 2014; Shum et al. 2011).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialRapid short-term reorganization in the language network
Hartwigsen, G., Bzdok, D., Klein, M., Wawrzyniak, M., Stockert, A., Wrede, K., Claßen, J., & Saur, D. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.25964 · Cited by 76
“…SMG or sham cTBS) was counterbalanced across subjects to the best possible degree. cTBS was performed using the mean Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinates for the left AG (x, y, z= 42,–66, 28 mm) and SMG (x, y, z= 45,–39, 45 mm) described in our previous study (Hartwigsen et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAn ALE meta-analytic review of musical expertise
Criscuolo, A., Pando‐Naude, V., Bonetti, L., Vuust, P., & Brattico, E. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-14959-4 · Cited by 76
Language comprehension and brain function in individuals with an optimal outcome from autism
Eigsti, I., Stevens, M. C. G., Schultz, R. T., Barton, M. L., Kelley, E. A., Naigles, L., Orinstein, A. J., Troyb, E., & FEIN, D. A. (2015) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.11.014 · Cited by 68
“…(Price et al., 1997) during reading, with the comprehension of complex verbal material (Klepousniotou et al., 2014), and in phonological processing (Hartwigsen et al., 2010), and right superior temporal/parahippocampal gyri (BA 38), for which activation is associated with the processing of verbal…”
Perturbation of the right prefrontal cortex disrupts interference control
Friehs, M. A., Klaus, J., Singh, T., Frings, C., & Hartwigsen, G. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117279 · Cited by 76
Murphy, K. A., Jogia, J., & Talcott, J. B. (2018) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.08.005 · Cited by 71
Hartwigsen, G., Golombek, T., & Obleser, J. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.027 · Cited by 68
Duda, B., & Sweet, L. H. (2019) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-019-00080-0 · Cited by 67
After-effects of 10 Hz tACS over the prefrontal cortex on phonological word decisions
Moliadze, V., Sierau, L., Lyzhko, E., Stenner, T., Werchowski, M., Siniatchkin, M., & Hartwigsen, G. (2019) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2019.06.021 · Cited by 71
“(6) showed that the left and the right pIFG essentially contribute to phonological decision-making.”
Skipper‐Kallal, L. M., Lacey, E. H., Xing, S., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2017) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2017/8740353 · Cited by 70
“Based on performance decrements after inhibitory TMS, other studies have also suggested that right hemisphere areas may be involved to some degree in phonology and naming in healthy people [53, 54].”
BackgroundGestures, Vocalizations, and Memory in Language Origins
Aboitiz, F. (2012) · Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnevo.2012.00002 · Cited by 66
“Some authors have proposed a relation to phonological processing (Moser et al., 2009; Hartwigsen et al., 2010; Turkeltaub and Coslett, 2010), while others propose a role restricted to the sensorimotor control of writing (Brownsett and Wise, 2010).”
BackgroundIshkhanyan, B., Lange, V. M., Boye, K., Mogensen, J., Karabanov, A. N., Hartwigsen, G., & Siebner, H. R. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00685 · Cited by 66
Lazard, D. S., Lee, H., Truy, É., & Giraud, A. (2012) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21504 · Cited by 69
“, 2007] than in phonological processing [Hartwigsen et al., 2010], we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) task in 10 post-lingual deaf subjects and 10 normal-hearing controls.”
MethodResultYin, X., Zhao, L., Xu, J., Evans, A. C., Fan, L., Ge, H., Tang, Y., Khundrakpam, B. S., Wang, J., & Liu, S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050590 · Cited by 66
“Recent evidence points to the recruitment of the right SMG in detecting intersensory conflict [36] and making decision [72].”
BackgroundSliwinska, M. W., Vitello, S., & Devlin, J. T. (2014) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/51735 · Cited by 78
Horowitz‐Kraus, T., Vannest, J. J., & Holland, S. K. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.002 · Cited by 57
Saalasti, S., Alho, J., Bar, M., Glerean, E., Honkela, T., Kauppila, M., Sams, M., & Jääskeläinen, I. P. (2019) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.1288 · Cited by 50
Ramanan, S., Irish, M., Patterson, K. E., Rowe, J. B., Gorno‐Tempini, M. L., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac208 · Cited by 52
“Considering language functions, posterior superior temporal and inferior supramarginal gyri are involved in extraction of spectro-temporal features of sound(41) and extraction and maintenance of phonological representations.(42) These specific functions, in turn, may be supported by shared neurophysiological mechanism…”
BackgroundHartwigsen, G., Bergmann, T. O., Herz, D. M., Angstmann, S., Karabanov, A. N., Raffin, E., Thielscher, A., & Siebner, H. R. (2015) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.06.014 · Cited by 57
Neural activity associated with semantic versus phonological anomia treatments in aphasia
van Hees, S., McMahon, K. L., Angwin, A. J., de Zubicaray, G. I., & Copland, D. A. (2014) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.12.004 · Cited by 55
“, 2010), and has been strongly linked to a range of phonological processes (Hartwigsen et al., 2010; McDermott, Petersen, Watson, & Ojemann, 2003), including involvement in the phonological loop of verbal working memory (Vigneau et al.”
BackgroundViolante, I. R., Ribeiro, M. J., Silva, E. D., & Castelo-Branco, M. S. (2013) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/1866-1955-5-3 · Cited by 53
“Here, we observed a deficit in gyrification in regions involved with language functions, namely in regions belonging to the Broca’s complex (pars opercularis, pars orbitalis, pars triangularis) [76,77], superior temporal gyrus and middle temporal gyrus [78,79] and supramarginal gyrus [80,81].”
BackgroundBranzi, F. M., Pobric, G., Jung, J., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2021) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01698 · Cited by 53
“This stimulation protocol has already been used over the inferior parietal cortex to induce inhibitory effects during language (Capotosto et al., 2017; Sliwinska et al., 2015; Hartwigsen et al., 2010) and nonlinguistic processing (Riddle, Scimeca, Cellier, Dhanani, & D’Esposito, 2020), which is consistent with the inh…”
MethodLanguage Mapping Using fMRI and Direct Cortical Stimulation for Brain Tumor Surgery
Brennan, N. M. P., Peck, K. K., & Holodny, A. I. (2016) · Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1097/rmr.0000000000000074 · Cited by 53
Noun and verb processing in aphasia: Behavioural profiles and neural correlates
Alyahya, R. S. W., Halai, A. D., Conroy, P., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2018) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.01.023 · Cited by 52
Left posterior inferior frontal gyrus is causally involved in reordering during sentence processing
Kuhnke, P., Meyer, L., Friederici, A. D., & Hartwigsen, G. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.013 · Cited by 49
Niu, Y., Wang, B., Zhou, M., Xue, J., Shapour, H., Cao, R., Cui, X., Wu, J., & Xiang, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00677 · Cited by 50
Baumann, A., Nebel, A., Granert, O., Giehl, K., Wolff, S., Schmidt, W., Baasch, C., Schmidt, G. U., Witt, K., Deuschl, G., et al. (2018) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968318812726 · Cited by 52
Murdaugh, D. L., Maximo, J. O., & Kana, R. K. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22821 · Cited by 49
“The SMG has been found to have an active role in language comprehension, specific to phonological processes [Hartwigsen et al., 2010; Sliwinska et al., 2012; Turkeltaub et al. 2003].”
BackgroundInfluentialInnocenti, G. M., Dyrby, T. B., Andersen, K. W., Rouiller, E. M., & Caminiti, R. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw161 · Cited by 48
“…the supramarginal gyrus, and the superior temporal gyrus, areas involved in language, including speech production (for data and references, see Hartwigsen et al. 2010; Friederici 2011; Geranmayeh et al. 2014; Kamali et al. 2014) while lesion of the isthmus itself cause dissociation of syntax…”
Skipper‐Kallal, L. M., Lacey, E. H., Xing, S., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23504 · Cited by 46
“…region, the right supramarginal gyrus, interefered with word production [Sollmann et al., 2014] and inhibited phonological decision making, but not semantic decision making, the latter of which would be better captured in the covert naming phase [Cogan et al., 2014; Hartwigsen et al., 2010].”
BackgroundAbnormal topological organization of structural covariance networks in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Zhang, Y., Qiu, T. H., Yuan, X., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Zhang, N., Zhou, C., Luo, C., & Zhang, J. (2018) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.101619 · Cited by 48
“Nonparametric permutation testing (1000 repetitions) was conducted to test the statistical significance of the ALS-related differences in global and regional network parameters (Bruno et al., 2017; He et al., 2008).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAltered Structural Brain Networks in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex
Im, K., Ahtam, B., Haehn, D., Peters, J. M., Warfield, S. K., Şahin, M., & Grant, P. E. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv026 · Cited by 47
“Finally, the third region was the right supramarginal gyrus, which is reported to be important for phonological processing (Hartwigsen et al. 2010) and overcoming emotional egocentricity (Silani et al.”
BackgroundVarnava, A., Stokes, M. G., & Chambers, C. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.08.016 · Cited by 46
The neural processing of foreign-accented speech and its relationship to listener bias
Yi, H., Smiljanić, R., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00768 · Cited by 45
“…test (IAT) has been used extensively to quantify the degree of implicit bias which may not be measured using explicit self-reported questionnaire entries (Greenwald et al., 1998, 2009; Mcconnell and Leibold, 2001; Bertrand et al., 2005; Devos and Banaji, 2005; Kinoshita and Peek-O’leary, 2005).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNeural correlates of intonation and lexical tone in tonal and non‐tonal language speakers
Chien, P., Friederici, A. D., Hartwigsen, G., & Sammler, D. (2020) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24916 · Cited by 51
Lai, V. T., van Dam, W. O., Conant, L. L., Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00044 · Cited by 44
“, and Siebner, H. R. (2010). Phonological decisions require both the left and right”
BackgroundHartwigsen, G., Saur, D., Price, C. J., Baumgaertner, A., Ulmer, S., & Siebner, H. R. (2012) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00342 · Cited by 40
“Only the second coil was connected to the stimulator and charged without effectively stimulating the brain (see Hartwigsen et al., 2010, for a similar sham procedure).”
MethodRobson, H., Keidel, J. L., Ralph, M. A. L., & Sage, K. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.022 · Cited by 42
“The strongest support for bilateral involvement in phonological processing comes from fMRI and TMS explorations in neurological-intact participants (e.g. Binder et al., 2000; Hartwigsen et al., 2010).”
BackgroundA Taxonomy of Brain–Behavior Relationships After Stroke
Turkeltaub, P. E. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-l-rsnp-19-0032 · Cited by 39
“These regions may play a minor role in language functions in everyone (Hartwigsen et al., 2010), perhaps as developmental remnants of early bilateral language networks (Newport et al.”
BackgroundExploring the neurobiology of reading through non-invasive brain stimulation: A review.
Turker, S., & Hartwigsen, G. (2021) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.05.001 · Cited by 40
Cardin, V., Orfanidou, E., Kästner, L., Rönnberg, J., Woll, B., Capek, C. M., & Rudner, M. (2015) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00872 · Cited by 39
“…participants make decisions about the sounds of words (i.e., their phonology) in contrast to decisions about their meanings (i.e., their semantics; Hartwigsen et al., 2010; Devlin, Matthews, & Rushworth, 2003; McDermott, Petersen, Watson, & Ojemann, 2003; Price, Moore, Humphreys, & Wise, 1997).”
BackgroundThe neural circuits recruited for the production of signs and fingerspelled words
Emmorey, K. D., Mehta, S. H., McCullough, S., & Grabowski, T. J. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.07.003 · Cited by 40
“5) that has also been implicated in speech production (e.g., Sollmann et al., 2014 (right SMG); Hartwigsen et al., 2010 (bilateral SMG); Schwartz, Faseyitan, Kim, & Coslett, 2012).”
BackgroundLi, Q., Huang, X., Ye, L., Wei, R., Zhang, Y., Zhong, Y., Jiang, N., & Shao, Y. (2016) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s117292 · Cited by 39
Mohan, R., & Weber, C. (2015) · Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1186/s11689-015-9124-7 · Cited by 38
“The left and right supramarginal gyri have been shown to be involved in phonological processing, as observed using transcranial magnetic stimulation [58].”
BackgroundGolestani, N. (2012) · International Journal of Bilingualism · doi:10.1177/1367006912456585 · Cited by 40
“…pars opercularis, or Brodmann’s area (BA) 44, and the left supramarginal gyrus within the left inferior parietal cortex, are involved in and even necessary for phonological processing and for subvocal rehearsal in verbal working memory (Hartwigsen et al., 2010; Paulesu, Frith, & Frackowiak, 1993).”
BackgroundFleming, D., Belleville, S., Peretz, I., West, G. L., & Zendel, B. R. (2019) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2019.103592 · Cited by 40
Hartwigsen, G., & Siebner, H. R. (2011) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.590573 · Cited by 37
“While conventional paradigms apply uni-site TMS over a single cortical area, more recent studies have also started to include multi-site TMS over two or more areas simultaneously (Hartwigsen, Baumgaertner, et al, 2010 ; Hartwigsen, Price, et al, 2010 ).”
BackgroundMei, L., Xue, G., Lu, Z., He, Q., Zhang, M., Wei, M., Xue, F., Chen, C., & Dong, Q. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093548 · Cited by 39
“A recent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study also found selective disruptions of phonological processing when TMS was applied over the SMG, but not when it was applied over AG [64].”
BackgroundHatton, S. N., Lagopoulos, J., Hermens, D. F., Scott, E. M., Hickie, I. B., & Bennett, M. R. (2013) · International Journal of Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1186/2194-7511-1-3 · Cited by 37
“These results are consistent with the literature associating this region with language comprehension and decision-making (Hartwigsen et al. 2010), and cortical thinning of the parietal lobe has been associated with attention deficits in first-episode psychosis patients in contrast to healthy controls (Crespo-Facorro e…”
ResultDynamic Reconfiguration of the Supplementary Motor Area Network during Imagined Music Performance
Tanaka, S., & Kirino, E. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00606 · Cited by 37
“, 2005; Gierhan, 2013) and involved in speech production and perception as well as verbal working memory (Hartwigsen et al., 2010; Turkeltaub and Coslett, 2010; Zevin et al., 2010; Deschamps et al., 2014; Simmonds et al., 2014; Simonyan and Fuertinger, 2015).”
BackgroundWeder, S., Zhou, X., Shoushtarian, M., Innes-Brown, H., & McKay, C. M. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology · doi:10.1007/s10162-018-0661-0 · Cited by 36
Margolis, A. E., Pagliaccio, D., Thomas, L. V., Banker, S. M., & Marsh, R. (2018) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000494 · Cited by 41
Yin, W., Chen, M., Hung, S., Baluyot, K., Li, T., & Lin, W. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.025 · Cited by 43
“Indeed, subcortical regions and supramarginal gyrus are suggested to be involved into language processing in recent studies (Ardila et al., 2016; Hartwigsen et al., 2010), as well as visual processing (Gabay et al.”
A Spatiotemporal Map of Reading Aloud
Woolnough, O., Donos, C., Curtis, A., Rollo, P. S., Roccaforte, Z. J., Dehaene, S., Fischer‐Baum, S., & Tandon, N. (2022) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2324-21.2022 · Cited by 37
Near‐infrared spectroscopy reveals neural perception of vocal emotions in human neonates
Zhang, D., Chen, Y., Hou, X., & Wu, Y. J. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24534 · Cited by 38
“The right SMG has been implicated in phonological processing (Hartwigsen et al., 2010; McDermott, Petersen, Watson, & Ojemann, 2003), emotional perception (Adolphs, Damasio, Tranel, Cooper, & Damasio, 2000), and empathic judgments (Silani, Lamm, Ruff, & Singer, 2013).”
BackgroundNative language differences in the structural connectome of the human brain
Wei, X., Adamson, H., Schwendemann, M., Goucha, T., Friederici, A. D., & Anwander, A. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119955 · Cited by 40
Non-invasive brain stimulation and language processing in the healthy brain
Flöel, A. (2011) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.589892 · Cited by 34
“Several authors have held the placing of electrodes by the 10–20 international EEG system, particularly in tDCS studies that use large electrode sizes, to be sufficiently precise, and the use of EEG electrode has been shown to be an appropriate method of localisation by neuronavigation techniques (Herwig, Satrapi, & S…”
MethodHartwigsen, G., Henseler, I., Stockert, A., Wawrzyniak, M., Wendt, C., Klingbeil, J., Baumgaertner, A., & Saur, D. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.026 · Cited by 33
“…reaction times rather modulated task-related activity in areas previously associated with working memory (left and right supramarginal gyrus; e.g. Hartwigsen et al., 2010), action planning, motor control and preparation of speech movements (supplementary motor area; Braun et al.,…”
Short-term modulation of the lesioned language network
Hartwigsen, G., Stockert, A., Charpentier, L., Wawrzyniak, M., Klingbeil, J., Wrede, K., Obrig, H., & Saur, D. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.54277 · Cited by 34
The role of left vs. right superior temporal gyrus in speech perception: An fMRI-guided TMS study
Ramos-Nuñez, A. I., Yue, Q., Pasalar, S., & Martin, R. C. (2020) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104838 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartwigsen, G., Baumgaertner, A., Price, C. J., Koehnke, M., Ulmer, S., & Siebner, H. R.
- Affiliations
- Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
- Hvidovre Hospital (DK)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-08-31
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 16494-16499
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC2944751
- OpenAlex
- W2156169663
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 8.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (082420)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Keywords
- supramarginal gyrus, right hemisphere, phonological processing, transcranial magnetic stimulation, angular gyrus, hemispheric lateralization, semantic judgment, perceptual decision making
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Language, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Parietal Lobe, Reaction Time, Semantics, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review