Cited by 161Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsReading and Literacy Development

Does the left superior longitudinal fascicle subserve language semantics? A brain electrostimulation study

Maldonado, Igor Lima, Moritz-Gasser, Sylvie, Duffau, Hugues·2011·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

Recent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography studies indicate that the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) represents a relay between frontal and temporal language sites. Some authors postulate that pathways connecting SMG to the posterior temporal lobe, i.e., the posterior part of the superior longitudinal fascicle (SLF) subserve semantic aspects of language. However, DTI provides only anatomic but not functional data. Therefore, it is impossible to conclude. Interestingly, intra-operative electrical mapping of cortical and subcortical language structures during tumor surgery is recognized as a reliable technique in functional neuroanatomy research. We mapped the underlying white matter of the SMG, especially the SLF, in 11 patients who underwent awake surgery for a glioma involving the left inferior parietal lobule. Using direct electrostimulation, we investigated the exact role of the SLF in language. Our findings indicate that the white matter under the inferior parietal lobule is highly involved in the dorsal phonological system. First, the SMG, connected to the ventral premotor cortex by horizontal fibers of the SLF, subserves articulatory processing, as demonstrated by dysarthria elicited by stimulation. Second, long arcuate fibers, found deeper in the white matter, subserve phonological processing, as supported by phonemic paraphasia induced by electrostimulation. Third, the most important result is that no semantic disturbances were elicited by stimulating the SLF, inclu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-011-0309-x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maldonado, I. L., Moritz-Gasser, S., & Duffau, H.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Gui de Chauliac (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
Duffau, Hugues
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2011-03-16
Volume
216
Issue
3
Pages
263-274
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2053696939
Cited by
161
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
superior longitudinal fasciculus, language semantics, supramarginal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, direct electrical stimulation, intraoperative language mapping, arcuate fasciculus, phonological processing, phonemic paraphasia, dysarthria, left hemisphere language, white matter tracts
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Brain Neoplasms, Electric Stimulation, Female, Glioma, Humans, Intraoperative Period, Language, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Pathways, Parietal Lobe, Semantics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review