Cited by 405Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial correlation between brain aerobic glycolysis and amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition

Open access

Abstract

Amyloid-β (Aβ) plaque deposition can precede the clinical manifestations of dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) by many years and can be associated with changes in brain metabolism. Both the Aβ plaque deposition and the changes in metabolism appear to be concentrated in the brain's default-mode network. In contrast to prior studies of brain metabolism which viewed brain metabolism from a unitary perspective that equated glucose utilization with oxygen consumption, we here report on regional glucose use apart from that entering oxidative phosphorylation (so-called "aerobic glycolysis"). Using PET, we found that the spatial distribution of aerobic glycolysis in normal young adults correlates spatially with Aβ deposition in individuals with DAT and cognitively normal participants with elevated Aβ, suggesting a possible link between regional aerobic glycolysis in young adulthood and later development of Alzheimer pathology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1010461107

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Vlassenko, A. G., Vaishnavi, S. N., Couture, L., Sacco, D., Shannon, B. J., Mach, R. H., Morris, J. C., Raichle, M. E., & Mintun, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Departments of aRadiology,
  • Neurology,
Corresponding author
Mintun, Mark A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-09-13
Volume
107
Issue
41
Pages
17763-17767
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2137243283
Cited by
404
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 28
FWCI
20.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p20mh077967-04, AG05681, AG003991)
  • National Institute on Aging (P50AG005681, P01AG003991)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P20MH-077967)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F30NS057901, P30NS048056, P50NS006833)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
aerobic glycolysis, amyloid-beta deposition, Alzheimer's disease, default mode network, brain glucose metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, spatial correlation, young adults, positron emission tomography
MeSH terms
Adult, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Brain, Female, Glucose, Glycolysis, Humans, Male, Oxygen, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review