The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic signals of origin, spread, and introgression in a large sample of maize landraces
Open accessAbstract
The last two decades have seen important advances in our knowledge of maize domestication, thanks in part to the contributions of genetic data. Genetic studies have provided firm evidence that maize was domesticated from Balsas teosinte ( Zea mays subspecies parviglumis ), a wild relative that is endemic to the mid- to lowland regions of southwestern Mexico. An interesting paradox remains, however: Maize cultivars that are most closely related to Balsas teosinte are found mainly in the Mexican highlands where subspecies parviglumis does not grow. Genetic data thus point to primary diffusion of domesticated maize from the highlands rather than from the region of initial domestication. Recent archeological evidence for early lowland cultivation has been consistent with the genetics of domestication, leaving the issue of the ancestral position of highland maize unresolved. We used a new SNP dataset scored in a large number of accessions of both teosinte and maize to take a second look at the geography of the earliest cultivated maize. We found that gene flow between maize and its wild relatives meaningfully impacts our inference of geographic origins. By analyzing differentiation from inferred ancestral gene frequencies, we obtained results that are fully consistent with current ecological, archeological, and genetic data concerning the geography of early maize cultivation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Population Structure and Eigenanalysis
Patterson, N., Price, A. L., & Reich, D. (2006) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190 · Cited by 5,280
Documenting domestication: The intersection of genetics and archaeology
Zeder, M. A., Emshwiller, E., Smith, B. D., & Bradley, D. G. (2006) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2006.01.007 · Cited by 447
Cited by
The Evolution of Animal Domestication
Larson, G., & Fuller, D. Q. (2014) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135813 · Cited by 640
Rethinking Dog Domestication by Integrating Genetics, Archeology, and Biogeography
Larson, G., Karlsson, E. K., Perri, A., Webster, M. T., Ho, S. Y. W., Peters, J., Stahl, P. W., Piper, P. J., Lingaas, F., Fredholm, M., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1203005109 · Cited by 540
Worldwide Patterns of Ancestry, Divergence, and Admixture in Domesticated Cattle
Decker, J. E., McKay, S. D., Rolf, M. M., Kim, J., Molina Alcalá, A., Sonstegard, T. S., Hanotte, O., Götherström, A., Seabury, C. M., Praharani, L., et al. (2014) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004254 · Cited by 521
Piperno, D. R. (2011) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/659998 · Cited by 427
Megabase-scale inversion polymorphism in the wild ancestor of maize
Fang, Z., Pyhäjärvi, T., Weber, A. L., Dawe, R. K., Glaubitz, J. C., González, J. D. J. S., Ross-Ibarra, C., Doebley, J., Morrell, P. L., & Ross-Ibarra, J. (2012) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.112.138578 · Cited by 104
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- van Heerwaarden, J., Doebley, J., Briggs, W. H., Glaubitz, J. C., Goodman, M. M., de Jesus Sanchez Gonzalez, J., & Ross-Ibarra, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2010-12-28
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1088-1092
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2018657659
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.