Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 64

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electron microscopy studies on the quaternary structure of p53 reveal different binding modes for p53 tetramers in complex with DNA

Melero, Roberto, Rajagopalan, Sridharan, Lázaro, Melisa, Joerger, Andreas C., Brandt, Tobias, Veprintsev, Dmitry B., Lasso, Gorka, Gil, David, Scheres, Sjors H. W., Carazo, José María, Fersht, Alan R., Valle, Mikel·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The multidomain homotetrameric tumor suppressor p53 has two modes of binding dsDNA that are thought to be responsible for scanning and recognizing specific response elements (REs). The C termini bind nonspecifically to dsDNA. The four DNA-binding domains (DBDs) bind REs that have two symmetric 10 base-pair sequences. p53 bound to a 20-bp RE has the DBDs enveloping the DNA, which is in the center of the molecule surrounded by linker sequences to the tetramerization domain (Tet). We investigated by electron microscopy structures of p53 bound to DNA sequences consisting of a 20-bp RE with either 12 or 20 bp nonspecific extensions on either end. We found a variety of structures that give clues to recognition and scanning mechanisms. The 44- and 60-bp sequences gave rise to three and four classes of structures, respectively. One was similar to the known 20-bp structure, but the DBDs in the other classes were loosely arranged and incompatible with specific DNA recognition. Some of the complexes had density consistent with the C termini extending from Tet to the DNA, adjacent to the DBDs. Single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments detected the approach of the C termini towards the DBDs on addition of DNA. The structural data are consistent with p53 sliding along DNA via its C termini and the DNA-binding domains hopping on and off during searches for REs. The loose structures and posttranslational modifications account for the affinity of nonspecific DNA for p53 and point to a mechanism of enhancement of specificity by its binding to effector proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1015520107

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81871-1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1101/gad.7.12b.2565 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1093/nar/23.3.362 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nsb0901-730 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80521-8 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90562-Q · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90165-5 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80007-8 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00283-0 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1529/biophysj.108.134122 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.032 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.4161/cbt.3.11.1189 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/nar/gkn044 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.7878474 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1126/science.7878469 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/nsb1294-877 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.015 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1038/onc.2008.400 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.str.2009.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/nsmb.1800 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00848-3 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1074/jbc.M309732200 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1073/pnas.0705069104 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1126/science.7792597 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.042 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1038/nmeth1139 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/0304-3991(87)90078-7 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.str.2009.10.009 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/nmeth992 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1073/pnas.92.19.8591 · DOI
  31. 10.1074/jbc.272.23.14842 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.96.5.1875 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s000180050271 · DOI
  34. 10.1073/pnas.0909644106 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80329-9 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1093/nar/gkm192 · DOI
  37. 10.1093/nar/gkp1041 · DOI
  38. 10.1074/jbc.M604209200 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1006/jsbi.1999.4174 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1021/ja9843730 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1002/jcc.20084 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 64

Metadata

Authors
Melero, R., Rajagopalan, S., Lázaro, M., Joerger, A. C., Brandt, T., Veprintsev, D. B., Lasso, G., Gil, D., Scheres, S. H. W., Carazo, J. M., Fersht, A. R., & Valle, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-12-22
Volume
108
Issue
2
Pages
557-562
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
64
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electron microscopy studies on the quaternary structure of p53 reveal different binding modes for p53 tetramers in complex with DNA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1015520107
The paper
Melero, R., Rajagopalan, S., Lázaro, M., Joerger, A. C., Brandt, T., Veprintsev, D. B., Lasso, G., Gil, D., Scheres, S. H. W., Carazo, J. M., Fersht, A. R., & Valle, M. (2011). Electron microscopy studies on the quaternary structure of p53 reveal different binding modes for p53 tetramers in complex with DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015520107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.