Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linking functional diversity and social actor strategies in a framework for interdisciplinary analysis of nature's benefits to society

Open access
Díaz, Sandra, Quétier, Fabien, Cáceres, Daniel M., Trainor, Sarah F., Pérez-Harguindeguy, Natalia, Bret-Harte, M. Syndonia, Finegan, Bryan, Peña-Claros, Marielos, Poorter, Lourens·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1017993108
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The crucial role of biodiversity in the links between ecosystems and societies has been repeatedly highlighted both as source of wellbeing and as a target of human actions, but not all aspects of biodiversity are equally important to different ecosystem services. Similarly, different social actors have different perceptions of and access to ecosystem services, and therefore, they have different wants and capacities to select directly or indirectly for particular biodiversity and ecosystem characteristics. Their choices feed back onto the ecosystem services provided to all parties involved and in turn, affect future decisions. Despite this recognition, the research communities addressing biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human outcomes have yet to develop frameworks that adequately treat the multiple dimensions and interactions in the relationship. Here, we present an interdisciplinary framework for the analysis of relationships between functional diversity, ecosystem services, and human actions that is applicable to specific social environmental systems at local scales. We connect the mechanistic understanding of the ecological role of diversity with its social relevance: ecosystem services. The framework permits connections between functional diversity components and priorities of social actors using land use decisions and ecosystem services as the main links between these ecological and social components. We propose a matrix-based method that provides a transparent and flexible platform for quantifying and integrating social and ecological information and negotiating potentially conflicting land uses among multiple social actors. We illustrate the applicability of our framework by way of land use examples from temperate to subtropical South America, an area of rapid social and ecological change.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1017993108

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1890/070062 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, 2005).
  3. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007).
  4. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711 · DOI · Paper page
  5. LH Gunderson, CS Holling Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems (Island Press, Washington, DC, 2002).
  6. 10.1126/science.1059386 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1231335100 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1146/annurev.energy.33.022207.104943 · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.33.022207.104943 · Paper page
  9. 10.1007/s00267-008-9101-y · DOI · Paper page
  10. GC Daily Nature's Services (Island Press, Washington, DC, 1997).
  11. 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1007/s10531-010-9834-9 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0488:RDECAR]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01018.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1007/s10531-010-9850-9 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1126/science.1094875 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1073/pnas.0711567105 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1890/080005 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01403.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1071/BT02124 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/aob/mcp230 · DOI
  24. 10.1890/07-1206.1 · DOI · Paper page
  25. F Casanoves, L Pla, J Di Rienzo, S Díaz, FDiversity: A software package for the integrated analysis of functional diversity. Methods Ecol Evol, 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00082.x. · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1890/080025 · DOI
  28. 10.5751/ES-01219-100117 · doi:10.5751/es-01219-100117
  29. 10.1073/pnas.0706559105 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1890/070216 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s10113-009-0099-3 · DOI
  32. N Long, A Long Battlefields of Knowledge: The Interlocking of Theory and Practice in Social Research and Development (Routledge, London, 1992).
  33. 10.3197/096327106776678951 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/03066150903142949 · DOI
  35. 10.4337/9781843765486 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  37. ER Babbie The Practice of Social Research (Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA, 1998).
  38. J Ritchie Qualitative Research Practice, eds J Ritchie, J Lewis (Sage Publications, London), pp. 24–46 (2003).
  39. HR Bernard Research Methods in Anthropology (Alta Mira Press, Walnut Creek, CA, 1995).
  40. 10.1016/0959-3780(90)90004-S · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.5751/ES-02688-140123 · DOI
  42. 10.1073/pnas.0704837104 · DOI · Paper page
  43. D Cáceres, Agrobiodiversity and technology in resource-poor farms. Interciencia 31, 403–410 (2006).
  44. 10.1080/03066150903353876 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1073/pnas.0709562104 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1073/pnas.1231334100 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.04.005 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/s10980-007-9135-1 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1007/s00267-004-0338-9 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.agee.2008.04.015 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.5751/ES-02867-140138 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01753.x · DOI · Paper page
  54. International Geosphere and Biosphere Programme Report No. 53/International Human Dimensions Programme Report No. 19 (IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm), pp. 64 (2005).

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Díaz, S., Quétier, F., Cáceres, D. M., Trainor, S. F., Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Bret-Harte, M. S., Finegan, B., Peña-Claros, M., & Poorter, L.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-01-10
Volume
108
Issue
3
Pages
895-902
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1017993108
OpenAlex
W2142625854
Cited by
284
References
13
FWCI
16.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking functional diversity and social actor strategies in a framework for interdisciplinary analysis of nature's benefits to society. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1017993108
The paper
Díaz, S., Quétier, F., Cáceres, D. M., Trainor, S. F., Pérez-Harguindeguy, N., Bret-Harte, M. S., Finegan, B., Peña-Claros, M., & Poorter, L. (2011). Linking functional diversity and social actor strategies in a framework for interdisciplinary analysis of nature's benefits to society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1017993108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.