Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 634

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Land‐use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities

Laliberté, Etienne, Wells, Jessie A., DeClerck, Fabrice, Metcalfe, Daniel J., Catterall, Carla P., Queiroz, Cibele, Aubin, Isabelle, Bonser, Stephen P., Ding, Yi, Fraterrigo, Jennifer M., McNamara, Sean, Morgan, John W., Merlos, Dalia Sánchez, Vesk, Peter A., Mayfield, Margaret M.·2010·Ecology Letters

Abstract

Ecosystem resilience depends on functional redundancy (the number of species contributing similarly to an ecosystem function) and response diversity (how functionally similar species respond differently to disturbance). Here, we explore how land‐use change impacts these attributes in plant communities, using data from 18 land‐use intensity gradients that represent five biomes and > 2800 species. We identify functional groups using multivariate analysis of plant traits which influence ecosystem processes. Functional redundancy is calculated as the species richness within each group, and response diversity as the multivariate within‐group dispersion in response trait space, using traits that influence responses to disturbances. Meta‐analysis across all datasets showed that land‐use intensification significantly reduced both functional redundancy and response diversity, although specific relationships varied considerably among the different land‐use gradients. These results indicate that intensified management of ecosystems for resource extraction can increase their vulnerability to future disturbances. Ecology Letters(2010) 13: 76–86

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01403.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Cited by

See all 634

Metadata

Authors
Laliberté, E., Wells, J. A., DeClerck, F., Metcalfe, D. J., Catterall, C. P., Queiroz, C., Aubin, I., Bonser, S. P., Ding, Y., Fraterrigo, J. M., McNamara, S., Morgan, J. W., Merlos, D. S., Vesk, P. A., & Mayfield, M. M.
Venue
Ecology Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-21
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
76-86
ISSN
  • 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-0248
OpenAlex
W946061202
Cited by
634
References
13
FWCI
15.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Land‐use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01403.x
The paper
Laliberté, E., Wells, J. A., DeClerck, F., Metcalfe, D. J., Catterall, C. P., Queiroz, C., Aubin, I., Bonser, S. P., Ding, Y., Fraterrigo, J. M., McNamara, S., Morgan, J. W., Merlos, D. S., Vesk, P. A., & Mayfield, M. M. (2010). Land‐use intensification reduces functional redundancy and response diversity in plant communities. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01403.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.