The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RETRACTED: Bacterial persistence by RNA endonucleases
Open accessAbstract
Bacteria form persisters, individual cells that are highly tolerant to different types of antibiotics. Persister cells are genetically identical to nontolerant kin but have entered a dormant state in which they are recalcitrant to the killing activity of the antibiotics. The molecular mechanisms underlying bacterial persistence are unknown. Here, we show that the ubiquitous Lon (Long Form Filament) protease and mRNA endonucleases (mRNases) encoded by toxin-antitoxin (TA) loci are required for persistence in Escherichia coli . Successive deletion of the 10 mRNase-encoding TA loci of E . coli progressively reduced the level of persisters, showing that persistence is a phenotype common to TA loci. In all cases tested, the antitoxins, which control the activities of the mRNases, are Lon substrates. Consistently, cells lacking lon generated a highly reduced level of persisters. Moreover, Lon overproduction dramatically increased the levels of persisters in wild-type cells but not in cells lacking the 10 mRNases. These results support a simple model according to which mRNases encoded by TA loci are activated in a small fraction of growing cells by Lon-mediated degradation of the antitoxins. Activation of the mRNases, in turn, inhibits global cellular translation, and thereby induces dormancy and persistence. Many pathogenic bacteria known to enter dormant states have a plethora of TA genes. Therefore, in the future, the discoveries described here may lead to a mechanistic understanding of the persistence phenomenon in pathogenic bacteria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Construction of Escherichia coli K‐12 in‐frame, single‐gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection
Baba, T., Ara, T., Hasegawa, M., Takai, Y., Okumura, Y., Baba, M., Datsenko, K. A., Tomita, M., Wanner, B. L., & Mori, H. (2006) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb4100050 · Cited by 7,858
Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations
Andrews, J. M. (2001) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/48.suppl_1.5 · Cited by 4,129
Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch
Balaban, N. Q., Merrin, J., Chait, R., Kowalik, L., & Leibler, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099390 · Cited by 2,952 · cited 1×
“Consistent with this view, persister cells are generated stochastically at a constant low frequency from exponentially growing populations of Escherichia coli cells (4).”
BackgroundLewis, K. (2010) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306 · Cited by 1,858
Molecular Mechanisms of HipA-Mediated Multidrug Tolerance and Its Neutralization by HipB
Schumacher, M. A., Piro, K. M., Xu, W., Hansen, S., Lewis, K., & Brennan, R. G. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1163806 · Cited by 351 · cited 4×
“HipA is thought to inhibit translation by phosphorylation of the essential translation factor Elongation FactorTu (7).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment
Brauner, A., Fridman, O., Gefen, O., & Balaban, N. Q. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.34 · Cited by 1,612
Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells
Fisher, R. A., Gollan, B., & Helaine, S. (2017) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42 · Cited by 1,243
ATP-Dependent Persister Formation in Escherichia coli
Shan, Y., Brown Gandt, A., Rowe, S. E., Deisinger, J. P., Conlon, B. P., & Lewis, K. (2017) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.02267-16 · Cited by 508
Comparative genomics of defense systems in archaea and bacteria
Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I., & Koonin, E. V. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt157 · Cited by 435
Bet Hedging in Yeast by Heterogeneous, Age-Correlated Expression of a Stress Protectant
Levy, S. F., Ziv, N., & Siegal, M. L. (2012) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001325 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Maisonneuve, E., Shakespeare, L. J., Jørgensen, M. G., & Gerdes, K.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-07-25
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 13206-13211
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2017165733
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 32.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RETRACTED: Bacterial persistence by RNA endonucleases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1100186108
- The paper
- Maisonneuve, E., Shakespeare, L. J., Jørgensen, M. G., & Gerdes, K. (2011). RETRACTED: Bacterial persistence by RNA endonucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100186108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.