Cited by 92Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchCellular transport and secretionExtracellular vesicles in disease

Molecular in situ topology of Aczonin/Piccolo and associated proteins at the mammalian neurotransmitter release site

Open access
Limbach, Christoph, Laue, Michael M., Wang, Xiaolu, Hu, Bin, Thiede, Nadine, Hultqvist, Greta, Kilimann, Manfred W.·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The protein machinery of neurotransmitter exocytosis requires efficient orchestration in space and time, for speed and precision of neurotransmission and also for synaptic ontogeny and plasticity. However, its spatial organization in situ is virtually unknown. Aczonin/Piccolo is a putative organizer protein of mammalian active zones. We determined by immunogold electron microscopy (EM) ( i ) the spatial arrangement (i.e., topology) of 11 segments of the Aczonin polypeptide in situ, and correlated it to ( ii ) the positioning of Aczonin-interacting domains of Bassoon, CAST/ELKS, Munc13, and RIM and ( iii ) the ultrastructurally defined presynaptic macromolecular aggregates known as dense projections and synaptic ribbons. At conventional synapses, Aczonin assumes a compact molecular topology within a layer 35 to 80 nm parallel to the plasma membrane (PM), with a “trunk” sitting on the dense projection top and a C-terminal “arm” extending down toward the PM and sideward to the dense projection periphery. At ribbon synapses, Aczonin occupies the whole ribbon area. Bassoon colocalizes with Aczonin at conventional synapses but not at ribbon synapses. At both conventional and ribbon synapses, CAST, Munc13, and RIM are segregated from Aczonin, closer to the PM, and Aczonin is positioned such that it may control the access of neurotransmitter vesicles to the fusion site.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1101707108

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EM studies of chemically fixed and stained central synapses showed that the active zone contains a hexagonal grid of dense projections with intercalated vesicles.

    “EM studies of chemically fixed and stained central synapses showed that the active zone contains a hexagonal grid of dense projections with intercalated vesicles (Figure 4A; Akert et al., 1972; Pfenninger et al., 1972; Limbach et al., 2011).”

    From The Presynaptic Active Zone (2012) · cites this paper as Limbach et al., 2011

    The introduction (page unavailable) says that EM of heavy-metal-stained mammalian synapses reveals regularly spaced dense projections forming a “presynaptic grid.” The “Dense Projections: Fact or Artifact?” section describes these structures in chemically fixed specimens and refers to docked vesicles within the grid, but our copy does not specify a hexagonal arrangement or say the vesicles are intercalated. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RIM and Munc13 are localized between the dense projections adjacent to the plasma membrane, whereas piccolo and bassoon are more distant and appear to be attached to the tips of the dense projections.

    “Immuno-EM experiments suggested that RIM and Munc13, arguably the two most important active zone proteins, are localized between the dense projections adjacent to the plasma membrane, whereas the cytomatrix proteins piccolo and bassoon are more distant and appear to be attached to the tips of the dense projections (Limbach et al., 2011).”

    From The Presynaptic Active Zone (2012) · cites this paper as Limbach et al., 2011

  • Munc13-1 in synapses appears tightly anchored to the active zone via scaffold proteins and interacts with components of the sub-membranous cytoskeleton, rendering it effectively insoluble.

    “Although Munc13s do not have transmembrane domains, Munc13-1 in synapses appears to be tightly anchored to the AZ via scaffold proteins [62,63] and interacts with components of the sub-membranous cytoskeleton [64], rendering it effectively insoluble [65].”

    From Presynaptic cAMP-PKA-mediated potentiation induces reconfiguration of synaptic vesicle pools and channel-vesicle coupling at hippocampal mossy fiber boutons (2024) · cites this paper as [63]

    Citation [65] is attached specifically to the claim that Munc13-1 is effectively insoluble. The Spatial Relationships section describes Munc13’s location and possible movement between the membrane and cytosol, but the passages found by searching for insolubility and detergent extraction do not address whether it is insoluble. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Harris JR, Horne R (1991) Negative staining. Electron Microscopy in Biology: A Practical Approach, eds Harris JR, Horne R (IRL Press, Oxford), pp 203-232.
  2. Sachs L (1982) Applied Statistics (Springer Verlag, New York).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Limbach, C., Laue, M. M., Wang, X., Hu, B., Thiede, N., Hultqvist, G., & Kilimann, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Kilimann, Manfred W.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-06-28
Volume
108
Issue
31
Pages
E392-401
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2011381493
Cited by
92
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publication server of the Robert Koch Institute (Robert Kock Institute) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Uppsala Universitet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
Keywords
piccolo, active zone, neurotransmitter release, synaptic vesicle exocytosis, ribbon synapses, bassoon, Munc13, RIM, synaptic ribbons, immunogold electron microscopy
MeSH terms
Animals, Binding Sites, Cell Membrane, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuropeptides, Protein Binding, Synapses, Immunoblotting, Microscopy, Immunoelectron, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Neurotransmitter Agents, GTP-Binding Proteins, Multiprotein Complexes, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review