Cited by 193Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysHeat shock proteins researchCell death mechanisms and regulation

The p53 inhibitors MDM2/MDMX complex is required for control of p53 activity in vivo

Open access
Huang, Lei, Yan, Zheng, Liao, Xiaodong, Li, Yuan, Yang, Jie, Wang, Zhu-Gang, Zuo, Yong, Kawai, Hidehiko +3 more·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

There are currently two distinct models proposed to explain why both MDM2 and MDMX are required in p53 control, with a key difference centered on whether these two p53 inhibitors work together or independently. To test these two competing models, we generated knockin mice expressing a point mutation MDMX mutant (C462A) that is defective in MDM2 binding. This approach allowed a targeted disassociation of the MDM2/MDMX heterocomplex without affecting the ability of MDMX to bind to p53, and while leaving the MDM2 protein itself completely untouched. Significantly, Mdmx C462A/C462A homozygous mice died at approximately day 9.5 of embryonic development, as the result of a combination of apoptosis and decreased cell proliferation, as shown by TUNEL and BrdU incorporation assays, respectively. Interestingly, even though the MDMX mutant protein abundance was found slightly elevated in the Mdmx C462A/C462A homozygous embryos, both the abundance and activity of p53 were markedly increased. A p53-dependent death was demonstrated by the finding that concomitant deletion of p53 completely rescued the embryonic lethality in Mdmx C462A/C462A homozygous mice. Our data demonstrate that MDM2 and MDMX function as an integral complex in p53 control, providing insights into the nonredundant nature of the function of MDM2 and MDMX.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1102309108

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mice expressing Mdmx lacking or with mutant RING domain die in utero, and p53 deletion rescues this phenotype.

    “Mice engineered to express Mdmx lacking its RING domain or containing a mutant RING domain die in utero, and this phenotype was rescued with deletion of p53.50,51”
  • Mdm2 and Mdm4 interact through their RING domains, and this interaction is required for p53 inhibition.

    “Mdm2 and Mdm4 also interact with each other through their respective RING domains, and this interaction is essential for inhibition of p53 (Figure 1).”

    From The Mdm network and its regulation of p53 activities: a rheostat of cancer risk (2014) · cites this paper as Huang, et al., 2011

  • Hetero-oligomerization of MDM2 and MDMX via their RING domains is crucial for suppression of p53 activity during embryonic development.

    “Hetero-oligomerization of MDM2 and MDMX via their RING domains is crucial for the suppression of p53 activity during embryonic development17,18.”

    From MDM2, MDMX and p53 in oncogenesis and cancer therapy (2013) · cites this paper as [17]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, L., Yan, Z., Liao, X., Li, Y., Yang, J., Wang, Z.-G., Zuo, Y., Kawai, H., Shadfan, M., Ganapathy, S., & Yuan, Z.-M.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Department of Medical Genetics, E-Institutes of Shanghai Universities, and
  • Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute (GB)
  • Hiroshima University (JP)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-07-05
Volume
108
Issue
29
Pages
12001-12006
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1976633722
Cited by
193
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 19
FWCI
8.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (30871363)
  • Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (E03003)
  • National Institutes of Health (/ NCI R01)
  • Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-08)
  • E-Institutes of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (E03003)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA125144, R01CA085679, R01CA85679)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Heat shock proteins research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
p53, MDM2, MDMX, p53 inhibitors, embryonic lethality, apoptosis, cell proliferation, knock-in mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Bromodeoxyuridine, Gene Expression Regulation, Genotype, Immunohistochemistry, Mutation, Blotting, Western, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Apoptosis, Mice, Knockout, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Multiprotein Complexes, Immunoprecipitation, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2, Gene Knock-In Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review