The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-term in vivo glucose monitoring using fluorescent hydrogel fibers
Open accessAbstract
The use of fluorescence-based sensors holds great promise for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in vivo, allowing wireless transdermal transmission and long-lasting functionality in vivo. The ability to monitor glucose concentrations in vivo over the long term enables the sensors to be implanted and replaced less often, thereby bringing CGM closer to practical implementation. However, the full potential of long-term in vivo glucose monitoring has yet to be realized because current fluorescence-based sensors cannot remain at an implantation site and respond to blood glucose concentrations over an extended period. Here, we present a long-term in vivo glucose monitoring method using glucose-responsive fluorescent hydrogel fibers. We fabricated glucose-responsive fluorescent hydrogels in a fibrous structure because this structure enables the sensors to remain at the implantation site for a long period. Moreover, these fibers allow easy control of the amount of fluorescent sensors implanted, simply by cutting the fibers to the desired length, and facilitate sensor removal from the implantation site after use. We found that the polyethylene glycol (PEG)-bonded polyacrylamide (PAM) hydrogel fibers reduced inflammation compared with PAM hydrogel fibers, transdermally glowed, and continuously responded to blood glucose concentration changes for up to 140 days, showing their potential application for long-term in vivo continuous glucose monitoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foreign body reaction to biomaterials
Anderson, J. M., Rodriguez, A., & Chang, D. T. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 · Cited by 5,138
Electrochemical Glucose Biosensors
Wang, J. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068123a · Cited by 3,498
Delves, P. J., & Roitt, I. M. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200007063430107 · Cited by 1,666
Skin inflammation induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS): an in-vivo model
TRENAM, C. W., DABBAGH, A. J., MORRIS, C. J., & BLAKE, D. R. (1991) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2133.1991.tb14165.x · Cited by 55
Cited by
Advances in engineering hydrogels
Zhang, Y. S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf3627 · Cited by 2,908
Liu, X., Liu, J., Lin, S., & Zhao, X. (2020) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2019.12.026 · Cited by 1,023
Bioactive hydrogels for bone regeneration
Bai, X., Gao, M., Syed, S., Zhuang, J., Xu, X., & Zhang, X.-Q. (2018) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.05.006 · Cited by 556
Döring, A., Birnbaum, W., & Kuckling, D. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60031a · Cited by 391
Glucose Sensing in Supramolecular Chemistry
Sun, X., & James, T. D. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500562m · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Heo, Y. J., Shibata, H., Okitsu, T., Kawanishi, T., & Takeuchi, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 33
- Pages
- 13399-13403
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2112740753
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term in vivo glucose monitoring using fluorescent hydrogel fibers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1104954108
- The paper
- Heo, Y. J., Shibata, H., Okitsu, T., Kawanishi, T., & Takeuchi, S. (2011). Long-term in vivo glucose monitoring using fluorescent hydrogel fibers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104954108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.