Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regulable neural progenitor-specific Tsc1 loss yields giant cells with organellar dysfunction in a model of tuberous sclerosis complex

Open access
Goto, June, Talos, Delia M., Klein, Peter, Qin, Wei, Chekaluk, Yvonne I., Anderl, Stefanie, Malinowska, Izabela A., Di Nardo, Alessia, Bronson, Roderick T., Chan, Jennifer A., Vinters, Harry V., Kernie, Steven G., Jensen, Frances E., Sahin, Mustafa, Kwiatkowski, David J.·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a multiorgan genetic disease in which brain involvement causes epilepsy, intellectual disability, and autism. The hallmark pathological finding in TSC is the cerebral cortical tuber and its unique constituent, giant cells. However, an animal model that replicates giant cells has not yet been described. Here, we report that mosaic induction of Tsc1 loss in neural progenitor cells in Tsc1 cc Nestin-rtTA + TetOp-cre + embryos by doxycycline leads to multiple neurological symptoms, including severe epilepsy and premature death. Strikingly, Tsc1 -null neural progenitor cells develop into highly enlarged giant cells with enlarged vacuoles. We found that the vacuolated giant cells had multiple signs of organelle dysfunction, including markedly increased mitochondria, aberrant lysosomes, and elevated cellular stress. We found similar vacuolated giant cells in human tuber specimens. Postnatal rapamycin treatment completely reversed these phenotypes and rescued the mutants from epilepsy and premature death, despite prenatal onset of Tsc1 loss and mTOR complex 1 activation in the developing brain. This TSC brain model provides insights into the pathogenesis and organelle dysfunction of giant cells, as well as epilepsy control in patients with TSC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1106454108

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Goto, J., Talos, D. M., Klein, P., Qin, W., Chekaluk, Y. I., Anderl, S., Malinowska, I. A., Di Nardo, A., Bronson, R. T., Chan, J. A., Vinters, H. V., Kernie, S. G., Jensen, F. E., Sahin, M., & Kwiatkowski, D. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-10-24
Volume
108
Issue
45
Pages
E1070-9
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2020209656
Cited by
179
References
10
FWCI
12.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Regulable neural progenitor-specific Tsc1 loss yields giant cells with organellar dysfunction in a model of tuberous sclerosis complex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1106454108
The paper
Goto, J., Talos, D. M., Klein, P., Qin, W., Chekaluk, Y. I., Anderl, S., Malinowska, I. A., Di Nardo, A., Bronson, R. T., Chan, J. A., Vinters, H. V., Kernie, S. G., Jensen, F. E., Sahin, M., & Kwiatkowski, D. J. (2011). Regulable neural progenitor-specific Tsc1 loss yields giant cells with organellar dysfunction in a model of tuberous sclerosis complex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1106454108

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.