Cited by 115

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

OCT4 establishes and maintains nucleosome-depleted regions that provide additional layers of epigenetic regulation of its target genes

You, Jueng Soo, Kelly, Theresa K., De Carvalho, Daniel D., Taberlay, Phillippa C., Liang, Gangning, Jones, Peter A.·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Recent epigenome-wide mapping studies describe nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs) at transcription start sites and enhancers. However, these static maps do not address causality or the roles of NDRs in gene control, and their relationship to transcription factors and DNA methylation is not well understood. Using a high-resolution single-molecule mapping approach to simultaneously investigate endogenous DNA methylation and nucleosome occupancies on individual DNA molecules, we show that the unmethylated OCT4 distal enhancer has an NDR, whereas NANOG has a clear NDR at its proximal promoter. These NDRs are maintained by binding of OCT4 and are required for OCT4 and NANOG expression. Differentiation causes a rapid loss of both NDRs accompanied by nucleosome occupancy, which precedes de novo DNA methylation. NDRs can be restored by forced expression of OCT4 in somatic cells but only when there is no cytosine methylation. These data show the central role of the NDRs, established by OCT4, in ensuring the autoregulatory loop of pluripotency and, furthermore, that de novo methylation follows the loss of NDRs and stabilizes the suppressed state.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1111309108

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 10.1242/dev.020867 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/carcin/bgp220 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1084/jem.20101438 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/ncb1403 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.015 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90561-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.023 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.022 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nrg2522 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/ng.409 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/ng.545 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.tig.2009.06.002 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.tig.2010.08.003 · DOI
  14. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000917 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.026 · DOI
  16. I Damjanov, B Horvat, Z Gibas, Retinoic acid-induced differentiation of the developmentally pluripotent human germ cell tumor-derived cell line, NCCIT. Lab Invest 68, 220–232 (1993).
  17. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4953 · DOI
  18. 10.1073/pnas.0604602103 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/416552a · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1091/mbc.e07-01-0029 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/stem.143 · DOI
  22. 10.1128/MCB.25.14.6031-6046.2005 · DOI
  23. 10.1128/MCB.25.6.2475-2485.2005 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1021/ja910264z · DOI
  26. 10.1002/stem.419 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/07391102.2010.10508585 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nature08450 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.08.009 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/nature09531 · DOI
  31. 10.1126/science.1200508 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90353-9 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/ncb1353 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1128/MCB.25.10.3923-3933.2005 · DOI
  35. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600013 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nsmb.1476 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/nature05987 · DOI
  38. 10.1128/MCB.00484-09 · DOI
  39. 10.1038/nrg2651 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.08.003 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
You, J. S., Kelly, T. K., De Carvalho, D. D., Taberlay, P. C., Liang, G., & Jones, P. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-08-15
Volume
108
Issue
35
Pages
14497-14502
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
115
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review