Cited by 119Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting

Nucleosomes containing methylated DNA stabilize DNA methyltransferases 3A/3B and ensure faithful epigenetic inheritance

Open access
Sharma, Shikhar, De Carvalho, Daniel D., Jeong, Shinwu, Jones, Peter A., Liang, Gangning·2011·PLoS Genetics

Abstract

How epigenetic information is propagated during somatic cell divisions is still unclear but is absolutely critical for preserving gene expression patterns and cellular identity. Here we show an unanticipated mechanism for inheritance of DNA methylation patterns where the epigenetic mark not only recruits the catalyzing enzyme but also regulates the protein level, i.e. the enzymatic product (5-methylcytosine) determines the level of the methylase, thus forming a novel homeostatic inheritance system. Nucleosomes containing methylated DNA stabilize de novo DNA methyltransferases, DNMT3A/3B, allowing little free DNMT3A/3B enzymes to exist in the nucleus. Stabilization of DNMT3A/3B on nucleosomes in methylated regions further promotes propagation of DNA methylation. However, reduction of cellular DNA methylation levels creating more potential CpG substrates counter-intuitively results in a dramatic decrease of DNMT3A/3B proteins due to diminished nucleosome binding and subsequent degradation of the unstable free proteins. These data show an unexpected self-regulatory inheritance mechanism that not only ensures somatic propagation of methylated states by DNMT1 and DNMT3A/3B enzymes but also prevents aberrant de novo methylation by causing degradation of free DNMT3A/3B enzymes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001286

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DNA methylation can also enhance gene expression through more complicated mechanisms such as methylation of CTCF binding sites and/or intronic regions.

    “However, DNA methylation also enhances gene expression through more complicated mechanisms such as the methylation of CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) binding sites and/or intronic regions (45–49).”

    From Epigenetic Modifications in Stress Response Genes Associated With Childhood Trauma (2019) · cites this paper as [46]

    The Introduction describes DNA methylation as a gene-silencing mechanism. The Discussion mentions CTCF as antagonistic to methylation, but does not say that methylating CTCF binding sites enhances expression. Searches for CTCF-site methylation and intronic methylation found no passage addressing the claimed expression-enhancing mechanisms; the copy does not rule out their occurrence elsewhere. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, S., De Carvalho, D. D., Jeong, S., Jones, P. A., & Liang, G.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
  • Jones, Peter A.
  • Liang, Gangning
Venue
PLoS Genetics
Published
2011-02-03
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
e1001286
ISSN
  • 1553-7390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1553-7404
OpenAlex
W1979413690
Cited by
119
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 17
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA124518, CA082422, R37CA082422)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Keywords
DNA methylation, epigenetic inheritance, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, nucleosome binding, protein stabilization, protein degradation, 5-methylcytosine, de novo methylation, DNMT1, somatic cell division, CpG sites
MeSH terms
DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferase 1, DNA Methyltransferase 3A, DNA Methyltransferase 3B, DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases, Enzyme Stability, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Nucleosomes, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Gene Silencing, Gene Expression Profiling, Epigenesis, Genetic, 5-Methylcytosine, HCT116 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review