Cited by 1,114Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsChromatin Remodeling and CancerEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Chromatin remodelling during development

Open access
Ho, Lena, Crabtree, Gerald R.·2010·Nature

Abstract

New methods for the genome-wide analysis of chromatin are providing insight into its roles in development and their underlying mechanisms. Current studies indicate that chromatin is dynamic, with its structure and its histone modifications undergoing global changes during transitions in development and in response to extracellular cues. In addition to DNA methylation and histone modification, ATP-dependent enzymes that remodel chromatin are important controllers of chromatin structure and assembly, and are major contributors to the dynamic nature of chromatin. Evidence is emerging that these chromatin-remodelling enzymes have instructive and programmatic roles during development. Particularly intriguing are the findings that specialized assemblies of ATP-dependent remodellers are essential for establishing and maintaining pluripotent and multipotent states in cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08911

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ho, L., & Crabtree, G. R.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
Nature
Published
2010-01
Volume
463
Issue
7280
Pages
474-484
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1984249881
Cited by
1,114
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 80 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 78 · 2012: 76
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS046789)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD055391)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
chromatin remodeling, developmental regulation, histone modifications, DNA methylation, pluripotency, multipotency, chromatin structure, extracellular signalling
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Humans, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Transcription Factors, Body Patterning, Drosophila Proteins, Chromatin Assembly and Disassembly, Genome-Wide Association Study, Mi-2 Nucleosome Remodeling and Deacetylase Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review