The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families
Open accessAbstract
The similarity in the three-dimensional structures of homologous proteins imposes strong constraints on their sequence variability. It has long been suggested that the resulting correlations among amino acid compositions at different sequence positions can be exploited to infer spatial contacts within the tertiary protein structure. Crucial to this inference is the ability to disentangle direct and indirect correlations, as accomplished by the recently introduced direct-coupling analysis (DCA). Here we develop a computationally efficient implementation of DCA, which allows us to evaluate the accuracy of contact prediction by DCA for a large number of protein domains, based purely on sequence information. DCA is shown to yield a large number of correctly predicted contacts, recapitulating the global structure of the contact map for the majority of the protein domains examined. Furthermore, our analysis captures clear signals beyond intradomain residue contacts, arising, e.g., from alternative protein conformations, ligand-mediated residue couplings, and interdomain interactions in protein oligomers. Our findings suggest that contacts predicted by DCA can be used as a reliable guide to facilitate computational predictions of alternative protein conformations, protein complex formation, and even the de novo prediction of protein domain structures, contingent on the existence of a large number of homologous sequences which are being rapidly made available due to advances in genome sequencing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Analysis of amino acid residue covariation in deep multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) has revealed that covarying residues in proteins are frequently found to be close together in the tertiary structure.”
From Ultrafast end-to-end protein structure prediction enables high-throughput exploration of uncharacterised proteins (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
The Pfam Protein Families Database
Bateman, A. G. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.276 · Cited by 14,075
Information theory and statistical mechanics
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.106.620 · Cited by 12,931
Eddy, S. R. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755 · Cited by 5,515
The Pfam protein families database
Punta, M., Coggill, P. C., Eberhardt, R. Y., Mistry, J., Tate, J., Boursnell, C., Pang, N., Forslund, K., Ceric, G., Clements, J., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1065 · Cited by 3,719
Solvable Model of a Spin-Glass
Sherrington, D., & Kirkpatrick, S. (1975) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.35.1792 · Cited by 3,577
Biological sequence analysis probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids
Durbin, R. M., Eddy, S. R., Krogh, A., & Mitchison, G. (1998) · Cited by 3,565
Durbin, R. M., Eddy, S. R., Krogh, A., & Mitchison, G. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790492 · Cited by 3,255
Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics. II
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.108.171 · Cited by 3,253
The Pfam protein families database
Finn, R. D., Mistry, J., Tate, J., Coggill, P., Heger, A., Pollington, J. E., Gavin, O. L., Gunasekaran, P., Ceric, G., Forslund, K., et al. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp985 · Cited by 2,694
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,002
Woo, H. J., & Jaques Reifman, A. (2013) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.02958-13 · Cited by 21
Multimeric protein interaction and complex prediction: Structure, dynamics and function
Lu, D., Yu, S., Huang, Y., & Gong, X. (2025) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2025.05.009 · Cited by 23
Braun, T., Leman, J. K., & Lange, O. F. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004661 · Cited by 20
Astl, L., Tse, A., & Verkhivker, G. M. (2019) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8719-7_9 · Cited by 18
Deep learning geometrical potential for high-accuracy ab initio protein structure prediction
Li, Y., Zhang, C., Yu, D., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104425 · Cited by 20
Metamorphic proteins under a computational microscope: Lessons from a fold-switching RfaH protein
Artsimovitch, I., & Ramírez‐Sarmiento, C. A. (2022) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.10.024 · Cited by 20
Distinguishing features of fold‐switching proteins
Chakravarty, D., Schafer, J. W., & Porter, L. L. (2023) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4596 · Cited by 19
The importance of dynamics in integrative modeling of supramolecular assemblies
Tamò, G. E., Abriata, L. A., & Peraro, M. D. (2015) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2015.02.018 · Cited by 19
Mining Tertiary Structural Motifs for Assessment of Designability
Zhang, J., & Grigoryan, G. (2013) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394292-0.00002-3 · Cited by 20
Zhang, H., Gao, Y., Deng, M., Wang, C., Zhu, J., Li, S. C., Zheng, W., & Bu, D. (2016) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.01.188 · Cited by 20
Improving landscape inference by integrating heterogeneous data in the inverse Ising problem
Barrat-Charlaix, P., Figliuzzi, M., & Weigt, M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep37812 · Cited by 20
Self-citationCo-evolution networks of HIV/HCV are modular with direct association to structure and function
Quadeer, A. A., Morales‐Jiménez, D., & McKay, M. R. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006409 · Cited by 18
Size and structure of the sequence space of repeat proteins
Marchi, J., Galpern, E. A., Espada, R., Ferreiro, D. U., Walczak, A. M., & Mora, T. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007282 · Cited by 20
Estimating the contribution of folding stability to nonspecific epistasis in protein evolution
Dasmeh, P., & Serohijos, A. W. R. (2018) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25588 · Cited by 19
Evaluating DCA-based method performances for RNA contact prediction by a well-curated data set
Pucci, F., Zerihun, M. B., Peter, E. K., & Schug, A. H. (2020) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.073809.119 · Cited by 20
Solving the inverse Ising problem by mean-field methods in a clustered phase space with many states
Decelle, A., & Ricci‐Tersenghi, F. (2016) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.94.012112 · Cited by 23
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Kagaya, Y., Terashi, G., Zhao, B., Xiong, Y., & Kihara, D. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08783-5 · Cited by 19
Prediction of Contact Residue Pairs Based on Co-Substitution between Sites in Protein Structures
Miyazawa, S. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054252 · Cited by 19
Using the Amino Acid Network to Modulate the Hydrolytic Activity of β-Glycosidases
Tamaki, F. K., de Souza, D. P., Souza, V. P., Ikegami, C. M., Farah, C. S., & Marana, S. R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167978 · Cited by 19
Integrating disorder in globular multidomain proteins: Fuzzy sensors and the role of SH3 domains
Arbesú, M., & Pons, M. (2019) · Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics · doi:10.1016/j.abb.2019.108161 · Cited by 19
Physics of biomolecular recognition and conformational dynamics
Chu, W., Yan, Z., Chu, X., Zheng, X., Liu, Z., Xu, L., Zhang, K., & Wang, J. (2021) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac3800 · Cited by 22
Extracting phylogenetic dimensions of coevolution reveals hidden functional signals
Colavin, A., Atolia, E., Bitbol, A., & Huang, K. C. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-04260-1 · Cited by 21
Deciphering polymorphism in 61,157 Escherichia coli genomes via epistatic sequence landscapes
Vigué, L., Croce, G., Petitjean, M., Ruppé, É., Tenaillon, O., & Weigt, M. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31643-3 · Cited by 22
Self-citationChinnam, N. B., Syed, A., Hura, G. L., Hammel, M., Tainer, J. A., & Tsutakawa, S. E. (2022) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2022.09.023 · Cited by 19
Inferring protein fitness landscapes from laboratory evolution experiments
D’Costa, S., Hinds, E. C., Freschlin, C. R., Song, H., & Romero, P. A. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010956 · Cited by 19
Disentangling Representations in Restricted Boltzmann Machines without Adversaries
Fernández-de-Cossio-Díaz, J., Cocco, S., & Monasson, R. (2023) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.13.021003 · Cited by 22
Protein co-evolution: how do we combine bioinformatics and experimental approaches?
Sandler, I., Abu‐Qarn, M., & Aharoni, A. (2012) · Molecular BioSystems · doi:10.1039/c2mb25317h · Cited by 19
The functional importance of co-evolving residues in proteins
Sandler, I., Zigdon, N., Levy, E., & Aharoni, A. (2013) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-013-1458-2 · Cited by 19
A generative model for protein contact networks
Livi, L., Maiorino, E., Giuliani, A., Rizzi, A., & Sadeghian, A. (2015) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2015.1077736 · Cited by 19
Avila-Herrera, A., & Pollard, K. S. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0677-y · Cited by 20
Network Analysis Reveals the Recognition Mechanism for Dimer Formation of Bulb-type Lectins
Zhao, Y., Jian, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, H., Liu, Q., Chanyou, C., Li, Z., Wang, L., Huang, H. H., & Zeng, C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03003-5 · Cited by 19
DCA for genome-wide epistasis analysis: the statistical genetics perspective
Gao, C.-Y., Cecconi, F., Vulpiani, A., Zhou, H., & Aurell, E. (2019) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/aafbe0 · Cited by 21
Vu, P. J. D., Yao, X., Momin, M., & Hamelberg, D. (2018) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.7b04263 · Cited by 19
Aging clocks, entropy, and the limits of age-reversalPreprint
Tarkhov, A. E., Denisov, K. A., & Fedichev, P. O. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.02.06.479300 · Cited by 19
Chen, J. Z., Bisardi, M., Lee, D., Cotogno, S., Zamponi, F., Weigt, M., & Tokuriki, N. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52614-w · Cited by 17
Self-citationProtein A-like Peptide Design Based on Diffusion and ESM2 Models
Zhao, L., He, Q., Song, H., Zhou, T., Luo, A., Wen, Z., Wang, T., & Lin, X. (2024) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules29204965 · Cited by 20
Niazi, S. (2025) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.csbr.2025.100064 · Cited by 20
Zhang, W., Meng, Q., Wang, J., & Guo, F. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac169 · Cited by 18
Sun, J., Kulandaisamy, A., Liu, J., Hu, K., Gromiha, M. M., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2023.01.036 · Cited by 21
Chen, K., Litfin, T., Singh, J., Zhan, J., & Zhou, Y. (2024) · Genomics Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/gpbjnl/qzae018 · Cited by 25
Gültaş, M., Düzgün, G., Herzog, S., Jäger, S., Meckbach, C., Wingender, E., & Waack, S. (2014) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-96 · Cited by 18
Abriata, L. A., Bovigny, C., & Peraro, M. D. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1124-4 · Cited by 18
Wilburn, D. B., Tuttle, L. M., Klevit, R. E., & Swanson, W. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1709061115 · Cited by 18
Evolutionary couplings detect side-chain interactions
Hockenberry, A. J., & Wilke, C. O. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.7280 · Cited by 16
MIIC online: a web server to reconstruct causal or non-causal networks from non-perturbative data
Sella, N., Verny, L., Uguzzoni, G., Affeldt, S., & Isambert, H. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx844 · Cited by 18
Direct coupling analysis of epistasis in allosteric materials
Bravi, B., Ravasio, R., Brito, C., & Wyart, M. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007630 · Cited by 21
Advancing protein structure prediction beyond AlphaFold2
Park, S., Myung, S., & Baek, M. (2025) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2025.102985 · Cited by 18
Recent progress and future challenges in structure-based protein-protein interaction prediction
Yuan, R., Zhang, J., Zhou, J., & Cong, Q. (2025) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.04.003 · Cited by 25
Electrostatic interaction optimization improves catalytic rates and thermotolerance on xylanases
Contessoto, V. G., Ramos, F. C., de Melo, R. R., de Oliveira, V. M., Scarpassa, J. A., de Sousa, A. S., Zanphorlin, L. M., Slade, G. G., Leite, V. B. P., & Ruller, R. (2021) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2021.03.036 · Cited by 17
Recent Advances in Protein Homology Detection Propelled by Inter-Residue Interaction Map Threading
Bhattacharya, S., Roche, R., Shuvo, M. H., & Bhattacharya, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.643752 · Cited by 18
Wangchuk, J., Chatterjee, A., Patil, S. D., Madugula, S. K., & Kondabagil, K. R. (2021) · Virology · doi:10.1016/j.virol.2021.09.004 · Cited by 17
Artificial intelligence for template-free protein structure prediction: a comprehensive review
Mufassirin, M. M. M., Newton, M. A. H., & Sattar, A. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-022-10350-x · Cited by 19
Efficient Hi-C inversion facilitates chromatin folding mechanism discovery and structure prediction
Schuette, G., Ding, X., & Zhang, B. (2023) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2023.07.017 · Cited by 15
Learning the shape of protein microenvironments with a holographic convolutional neural network
Pun, M. N., Ivanov, A., Bellamy, Q., Montague, Z., LaMont, C., Bradley, P. H., Otwinowski, J., & Nourmohammad, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2300838121 · Cited by 18
A many-body term improves the accuracy of effective potentials based on protein coevolutionary data
Contini, A., & Tiana, G. (2015) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4926665 · Cited by 17
Kassem, M. M., Wang, Y., Boomsma, W., & Lindorff‐Larsen, K. (2016) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2016.04.039 · Cited by 17
Three-body interactions improve contact prediction within direct-coupling analysis
Schmidt, M., & Hamacher, K. (2017) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.96.052405 · Cited by 17
dos Santos, R. N., Ferrari, A., de Jesus, H. C. R., Gozzo, F. C., Morcos, F., & Martínez, L. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty074 · Cited by 17
Self-citationKlein, S. A., Majumdar, A. K., & Barrick, D. (2019) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00355 · Cited by 17
Phylogenetic Weighting Does Little to Improve the Accuracy of Evolutionary Coupling Analyses
Hockenberry, A. J., & Wilke, C. O. (2019) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e21101000 · Cited by 18
Aligning biological sequences by exploiting residue conservation and coevolution
Muntoni, A. P., Pagnani, A., Weigt, M., & Zamponi, F. (2020) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.102.062409 · Cited by 20
Self-citationAssessing the accuracy of contact and distance predictions in CASP14
Ruiz‐Serra, V., Pontes, C. F. T., Milanetti, E., Kryshtafovych, A., Lepore, R., & Valencia, A. (2021) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26248 · Cited by 17
Reduced B cell antigenicity of Omicron lowers host serologic response
Tubiana, J., Xiang, Y., Fan, L., Wolfson, H. J., Chen, K., Schneidman‐Duhovny, D., & Shi, Y. (2022) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111512 · Cited by 18
Bastolla, U. (2014) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom4010291 · Cited by 17
Inferring repeat-protein energetics from evolutionary information
Espada, R., Parra, R. G., Mora, T., Walczak, A. M., & Ferreiro, D. U. (2017) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005584 · Cited by 17
Yang, J., & Shen, H. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx593 · Cited by 17
Coevolutionary Analysis of Protein Subfamilies by Sequence Reweighting
Malinverni, D., & Barducci, A. (2019) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e21111127 · Cited by 17
Engineering Allostery into Proteins
Gorman, S. D., D’Amico, R. N., Winston, D. S., & Boehr, D. D. (2019) · Advances in experimental medicine and biology · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8719-7_15 · Cited by 17
Reverse-engineering biological networks from large data setsPreprint
Natale, J. L., Hofmann, D., Hernández, D. G., & Nemenman, I. M. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/142034 · Cited by 20
Learning protein constitutive motifs from sequence data
Tubiana, J., Cocco, S., & Monasson, R. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.39397 · Cited by 129
ProtMamba: a homology-aware but alignment-free protein state space model
Sgarbossa, D., Malbranke, C., & Bitbol, A.-F. (2025) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf348 · Cited by 27
Cutting-edge computational approaches in enzyme design and activity enhancement
Sun, R., Wu, D., Chen, P., & Zheng, P. (2024) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2024.109510 · Cited by 20
How artificial intelligence is reengineering protein engineering
Listgarten, J., & Jiang, H. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aec8444 · Cited by 20
Mean-field method with correlations determined by linear response
Raymond, J., & Ricci‐Tersenghi, F. (2013) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.87.052111 · Cited by 16
Understanding structural malleability of the SARS-CoV-2 proteins and relation to the comorbidities
Sen, S., Dey, A., Bandhyopadhyay, S., Uversky, V. N., & Maulik, U. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab232 · Cited by 16
Chen, K., Karuppusamy, J., O’Neill, M. B., Opuu, V., Bahin, M., Foulon, S., Ibanez, P., Quintana‐Murci, L., Ozawa, T., van der Werf, S., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2211098120 · Cited by 16
Dynamic correlations: exact and approximate methods for mutual information
Demirtaş, K., Erman, B., & Haliloǧlu, T. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae076 · Cited by 16
Learning millisecond protein dynamics from what is missing in NMR spectra
Wayment-Steele, H. K., Nesr, G. E., Hettiarachchi, R., Ojoawo, A. M., Kariyawasam, H., Ovchinnikov, S., & Kern, D. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-026-10989-4 · Cited by 16
Hou, Q., Dutilh, B. E., Huynen, M. A., Heringa, J., & Feenstra, K. A. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0758-y · Cited by 16
Detection of Cheating by Decimation Algorithm
Yamanaka, S., Ohzeki, M., & Decelle, A. (2015) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.84.024801 · Cited by 16
Forging tools for refining predicted protein structures
Lin, X., Schafer, N. P., Lu, W., Jin, S., Chen, X., Chen, M., Onuchic, J. N., & Wolynes, P. G. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900778116 · Cited by 16
Self-citationThe importance and future of biochemical engineering
Whitehead, T. A., Banta, S., Bentley, W. E., Betenbaugh, M. J., Chan, C., Clark, D. S., Hoesli, C. A., Jewett, M. C., Junker, B., Koffas, M. A. G., et al. (2020) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.27364 · Cited by 17
Leri: A web-server for identifying protein functional networks from evolutionary couplings
Cheung, N. J., Peter, A. T. J., & Kornmann, B. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.002 · Cited by 16
Miyazawa, S. (2017) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.08.018 · Cited by 18
Interplay between sequence, structure and linear motifs in the adenovirus E1A hub protein
Glavina, J., Román, E. A., Espada, R., Gay, G. D. P., Chemes, L. B., & Sanchez, I. E. (2018) · Virology · doi:10.1016/j.virol.2018.08.012 · Cited by 16
Protein Structure Prediction in CASP13 Using AWSEM-Suite
Jin, S., Chen, M., Chen, X., Bueno, C., Lu, W., Schafer, N. P., Lin, X., Onuchic, J. N., & Wolynes, P. G. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00188 · Cited by 16
Self-citationTsishyn, M., Hermans, P., Rooman, M., & Pucci, F. (2025) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaf322 · Cited by 15
A common root for coevolution and substitution rate variability in protein sequence evolution
Rizzato, F., Zamuner, S., Pagnani, A., & Laio, A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53958-w · Cited by 15
Self-citationEye-tracking as a proxy for coherence and complexity of texts
Torres, D., de Sena, W. R., Carmona, H. A., Moreira, A. A., Makse, H. A., & Andrade, J. S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260236 · Cited by 16
Evolution of SLiM-mediated hijack functions in intrinsically disordered viral proteins
Glavina, J., Palópoli, N., & Chemes, L. B. (2022) · Essays in Biochemistry · doi:10.1042/ebc20220059 · Cited by 15
Inferring effective couplings with restricted Boltzmann machines
Decelle, A., Furtlehner, C., Gómez, A. D. J. N., & Seoane, B. (2024) · SciPost Physics · doi:10.21468/scipostphys.16.4.095 · Cited by 17
Banayan, N. E., Loughlin, B. J., Singh, S., Forouhar, F., Lu, G., Wong, K., Neky, M. J., Hunt, H. S., Bateman, L. B., Tamez, A., et al. (2024) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4898 · Cited by 14
Design of functional intrinsically disordered proteins
Garg, A., Foutel, N. S. G., Gielnik, M. B., & Kjærgaard, M. (2024) · Protein Engineering Design and Selection · doi:10.1093/protein/gzae004 · Cited by 15
Nechushtai, R., Rowland, L. M., Karmi, O., Marjault, H., Nguyen, T. T., Mittal, S., Ahmed, R. S., Grant, D. G., Manrique‐Acevedo, C., Morcos, F., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2405123121 · Cited by 15
Self-citationUsing Analyses of Amino Acid Coevolution to Understand Protein Structure and Function
Ashenberg, O., & Laub, M. T. (2013) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394292-0.00009-6 · Cited by 15
Hart, G. R., & Ferguson, A. L. (2018) · Physical Biology · doi:10.1088/1478-3975/aaeec0 · Cited by 13
PconsFam: An Interactive Database of Structure Predictions of Pfam Families
Lamb, J., Jarmolinska, A. I., Michel, M., Hurtado, D. M., Sulkowska, J. I., & Elofsson, A. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.047 · Cited by 14
Molecular replacement using structure predictions from databases
Simpkin, A. J., Thomas, J. M. H., Šimkovic, F., Keegan, R. M., & Rigden, D. J. (2019) · Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology · doi:10.1107/s2059798319013962 · Cited by 14
Bhattacharya, S., & Bhattacharya, D. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-59834-2 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Morcos, F., Pagnani, A., Lunt, B., Bertolino, A., Marks, D. S., Sander, C., Zecchina, R., Onuchic, J. N., Hwa, T., & Weigt, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Institute for Scientific Interchange (IT)
- Harvard University (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0374;
- Biologie Computationnelle, Quantitative et Synthétique (FR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-11-21
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- E1293-301
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3241805
- OpenAlex
- W2008545402
- Cited by
- 1,434
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 93 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 145 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 18.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
- PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM106303)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- direct coupling analysis, residue coevolution, protein contact prediction, native contacts, protein domains, homologous sequences, domain-domain interactions, protein oligomers, protein complex formation, de novo protein structure prediction, contact maps
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Amino Acids, Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Reproducibility of Results, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping, Protein Multimerization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review