The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families
Open accessAbstract
The similarity in the three-dimensional structures of homologous proteins imposes strong constraints on their sequence variability. It has long been suggested that the resulting correlations among amino acid compositions at different sequence positions can be exploited to infer spatial contacts within the tertiary protein structure. Crucial to this inference is the ability to disentangle direct and indirect correlations, as accomplished by the recently introduced direct-coupling analysis (DCA). Here we develop a computationally efficient implementation of DCA, which allows us to evaluate the accuracy of contact prediction by DCA for a large number of protein domains, based purely on sequence information. DCA is shown to yield a large number of correctly predicted contacts, recapitulating the global structure of the contact map for the majority of the protein domains examined. Furthermore, our analysis captures clear signals beyond intradomain residue contacts, arising, e.g., from alternative protein conformations, ligand-mediated residue couplings, and interdomain interactions in protein oligomers. Our findings suggest that contacts predicted by DCA can be used as a reliable guide to facilitate computational predictions of alternative protein conformations, protein complex formation, and even the de novo prediction of protein domain structures, contingent on the existence of a large number of homologous sequences which are being rapidly made available due to advances in genome sequencing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Analysis of amino acid residue covariation in deep multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) has revealed that covarying residues in proteins are frequently found to be close together in the tertiary structure.”
From Ultrafast end-to-end protein structure prediction enables high-throughput exploration of uncharacterised proteins (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
The Pfam Protein Families Database
Bateman, A. G. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.276 · Cited by 14,075
Information theory and statistical mechanics
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.106.620 · Cited by 12,931
Eddy, S. R. (1998) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.755 · Cited by 5,515
The Pfam protein families database
Punta, M., Coggill, P. C., Eberhardt, R. Y., Mistry, J., Tate, J., Boursnell, C., Pang, N., Forslund, K., Ceric, G., Clements, J., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1065 · Cited by 3,719
Solvable Model of a Spin-Glass
Sherrington, D., & Kirkpatrick, S. (1975) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.35.1792 · Cited by 3,577
Biological sequence analysis probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids
Durbin, R. M., Eddy, S. R., Krogh, A., & Mitchison, G. (1998) · Cited by 3,565
Durbin, R. M., Eddy, S. R., Krogh, A., & Mitchison, G. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790492 · Cited by 3,255
Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics. II
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.108.171 · Cited by 3,253
The Pfam protein families database
Finn, R. D., Mistry, J., Tate, J., Coggill, P., Heger, A., Pollington, J. E., Gavin, O. L., Gunasekaran, P., Ceric, G., Forslund, K., et al. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp985 · Cited by 2,694
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 1,002
Hu, J. P., Liu, H., Sun, J., Wang, J., & Liu, R. (2018) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.3448 · Cited by 11
Coevolutionary Signals and Structure-Based Models for the Prediction of Protein Native Conformations
dos Santos, R. N., Jiang, X., Martı́nez, L., & Morcos, F. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8736-8_5 · Cited by 11
Self-citationFongang, B., Cunningham, K. A., Rowicka, M., & Kudlicki, A. S. (2019) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.05.013 · Cited by 14
Coevolutionary Analysis of Protein Sequences for Molecular Modeling
Malinverni, D., & Barducci, A. (2019) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9608-7_16 · Cited by 10
Fukasawa, Y., & Tomii, K. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48913-8 · Cited by 12
Network science: Ising states of matter
Sun, H., Panda, R. K., Verdel, R., Rodríguez, Á., Dalmonte, M., & Ginestra Bianconi, A. (2024) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.109.054305 · Cited by 14
Evans, D. L., & Joshi, S. V. (2016) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.07.025 · Cited by 11
An information theoretic framework reveals a tunable allosteric network in group II chaperonins
Lopez, T., Dalton, K. M., Tomlinson, A. A. G., Pande, V. S., & Frydman, J. (2017) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsmb.3440 · Cited by 11
Combining Evolutionary Covariance and NMR Data for Protein Structure Determination
Huang, Y. J., Brock, K. P., Ishida, Y., Swapna, G. V. T., Inouye, M., Marks, D. S., Sander, C., & Montelione, G. T. (2018) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/bs.mie.2018.11.004 · Cited by 10
Self-citationMulligan, V. K. (2021) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2021.1918097 · Cited by 12
Co‐Evolutionary Fitness Landscapes for Sequence Design
Tian, P., Louis, J. M., Baber, J. L., Aniana, A., & Best, R. B. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie · doi:10.1002/ange.201713220 · Cited by 11
Single-Sequence, Structure Free Allosteric Residue Prediction with Protein Language ModelsPreprint
Kannan, G. R., Hie, B., & Kim, P. S. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.10.03.616547 · Cited by 11
Designing molecular RNA switches with Restricted Boltzmann machines
Fernandez-de-Cossio-Diaz, J., Hardouin, P., Lyonnet du Moutier, F.-X., Di Gioacchino, A., Marchand, B., Ponty, Y., Sargueil, B., Monasson, R., & Cocco, S. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66265-y · Cited by 20
Arsiwala, A., Bhatt, R., van Niekerk, L., Quintero-Cadena, P., Ao, X., Rosenbaum, A., Bhatt, A., Smith, A., Yang, Y., Anderson, K., et al. (2025) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2025.2593055 · Cited by 16
Cell-Free Reaction System for ATP Regeneration from d -Fructose
Kraußer, F., Rabe, K., Topham, C. M., Voland, J., Lilienthal, L., Kundoch, J.-O., Ohde, D., Liese, A., & Walther, T. (2025) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.4c00877 · Cited by 10
Efficient epistasis inference via higher-order covariance matrix factorization
Shimagaki, K. S., & Barton, J. P. (2025) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyaf118 · Cited by 10
Co‐evolutionary constraints of globular proteins correlate with their folding rates
Mallik, S., & Kundu, S. (2015) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2015.06.032 · Cited by 10
Delarue, M. H., & Koehl, P. (2018) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.14870.1 · Cited by 10
FilterDCA: Interpretable supervised contact prediction using inter-domain coevolution
Muscat, M., Croce, G., Sarti, E., & Weigt, M. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007621 · Cited by 13
Self-citationStructural evolution of the ancient enzyme, dissimilatory sulfite reductase
Colman, D. R., Labesse, G., Swapna, G. V. T., Stefanakis, J., Montelione, G. T., Boyd, E. S., & Royer, C. A. (2022) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26315 · Cited by 10
Introduction to the dynamics of disordered systems: Equilibrium and gradient descent
Folena, G., Manacorda, A., & Zamponi, F. (2022) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2022.128152 · Cited by 11
Diversifying Design of Nucleic Acid Aptamers Using Unsupervised Machine Learning
Moussa, S., Kilgour, M., Jans, C., Hernández-García, Á., Čuperlović‐Culf, M., Bengio, Y., & Simine, L. (2022) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c05660 · Cited by 10
Discovering co-occurring patterns and their biological significance in protein families
Lee, E.-S. A., Fung, S., Sze-To, H.-Y., & Wong, A. K. C. (2014) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-s12-s2 · Cited by 10
A three-dimensional topology of complex I inferred from evolutionary correlations
Kensche, P. R., Duarte, I., & Huynen, M. A. (2012) · BMC Structural Biology · doi:10.1186/1472-6807-12-19 · Cited by 10
Marchetti, J., Monzón, A. M., Tosatto, S. C. E., Parisi, G. D., & Fornasari, M. S. (2019) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.031 · Cited by 9
Role of protein-protein interactions in allosteric drug design for DNA methyltransferases
Liang, Z. T., Zhu, Y., Liu, X., & Hu, G. (2020) · Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology · doi:10.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.12.005 · Cited by 10
FingerprintContacts: Predicting Alternative Conformations of Proteins from Coevolution
Feng, J., & Shukla, D. (2020) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b11869 · Cited by 9
Neuwald, A. F., Lanczycki, C. J., Hodges, T. K., & Marchler‐Bauer, A. (2020) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baaa042 · Cited by 10
Experimental determination and data-driven prediction of homotypic transmembrane domain interfaces
Xiao, Y., Zeng, B., Berner, N., Frishman, D., Langosch, D., & Teese, M. G. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.09.035 · Cited by 10
Computational pipeline to probe NaV1.7 gain-of-function variants in neuropathic painful syndromes
Toffano, A., Chiarot, G., Zamuner, S., Marchi, M., Salvi, E., Waxman, S. G., Faber, C. G., Lauria, G., Giacometti, A., & Simeoni, M. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74591-y · Cited by 10
Fitness landscape of a dynamic RNA structure
Soo, V. W. C., Swadling, J. B., Faure, A. J., & Warnecke, T. (2021) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009353 · Cited by 10
Limits to detecting epistasis in the fitness landscape of HIV
Biswas, A., Haldane, A., & Levy, R. M. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262314 · Cited by 10
Exploring the miRNA Regulatory Network Using Evolutionary Correlations
Obermayer, B., & Levine, E. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003860 · Cited by 11
Learning with unknowns: Analyzing biological data in the presence of hidden variables
Battistin, C., Dunn, B. A., & Roudi, Y. (2017) · Current Opinion in Systems Biology · doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2016.12.010 · Cited by 10
Identifying functionally informative evolutionary sequence profiles
Gil, N., & Fiser, A. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx779 · Cited by 10
Efficient inference, potential, and limitations of site-specific substitution models
Puller, V., Sagulenko, P., & Neher, R. A. (2020) · Virus Evolution · doi:10.1093/ve/veaa066 · Cited by 10
Inverse Ising inference with correlated samples
Obermayer, B., & Levine, E. (2014) · MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) · Cited by 10
Comparative Protein Structure Modelling
Fiser, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1069-3_4 · Cited by 11
Deciphering membrane protein structures from protein sequences
Flock, T., Venkatakrishnan, A., Vinothkumar, K., & Babu, M. M. (2012) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-160 · Cited by 10
3D protein structure from genetic epistasis experimentsPreprint
Rollins, N. J., Brock, K. P., Poelwijk, F. J., Stiffler, M. A., Gauthier, N. P., Sander, C., & Marks, D. S. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/320721 · Cited by 10
Self-citationLees, J. A., Mai, T., Galardini, M., Wheeler, N. E., & Corander, J. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/852426 · Cited by 10
Neural Potts ModelPreprint
Sercu, T., Verkuil, R., Meier, J., Amos, B., Lin, Z., Chen, C., Liu, J. J., LeCun, Y., & Rives, A. W. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.04.08.439084 · Cited by 10
Pre-training Co-evolutionary Protein Representation via A Pairwise Masked Language ModelPreprint
He, L., Zhang, S., Wu, L., Xia, H., Ju, F., Zhang, H., Liu, S., Xia, Y., Zhu, J., Deng, P., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.15527 · Cited by 35
Illig, A.-M., Siedhoff, N. E., Schwaneberg, U., & Davari, M. D. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.06.07.495081 · Cited by 10
Deep learning-enabled design of synthetic orthologs of a signaling proteinPreprint
Lian, X., Praljak, N., Subramanian, S. K., Wasinger, S., Ranganathan, R., & Ferguson, A. L. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.21.521443 · Cited by 10
Enzyme structure correlates with variant effect predictability
(2024) · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2024.09.007 · Cited by 13
Statistical genetics in and out of quasi-linkage equilibrium
Dichio, V., Zeng, H.-L., & Aurell, E. (2023) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/acc5fa · Cited by 13
Bioinformatics-aided Protein Sequence Analysis and Engineering
Zhang, W., & Wang, T. (2023) · Current Protein and Peptide Science · doi:10.2174/1389203724666230509124300 · Cited by 9
Wolf, K., Kosiński, J., Gibson, T. J., Wesch, N., Dötsch, V., Genuardi, M., Cordisco, E. L., Zeuzem, S., Brieger, A., & Plotz, G. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad418 · Cited by 10
Sarkar, S., Dhibar, S., & Jana, B. (2024) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/d4cp01806k · Cited by 9
di Sarra, G., Bravi, B., & Roudi, Y. (2025) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/ada636 · Cited by 9
Cui, Q. (2025) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2025.168998 · Cited by 10
Allostery is a widespread cause of loss-of-function variant pathogenicity
Liao, X., & Lehner, B. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-74517-8 · Cited by 13
Probabilistic grammatical model for helix‐helix contact site classification
Dyrka, W., Nebel, J., & Kotulska, M. (2013) · Algorithms for Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/1748-7188-8-31 · Cited by 9
OMPcontact: An Outer Membrane Protein Inter-Barrel Residue Contact Prediction Method
Zhang, L., Wang, H., Yan, L., Su, L., & Xu, D. H. (2016) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2015.0236 · Cited by 9
Inverse finite-size scaling for high-dimensional significance analysis
Xu, Y., Puranen, S., Corander, J., & Kabashima, Y. (2018) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.97.062112 · Cited by 9
Guo, Y., Wu, J., Ma, H., Wang, S., & Huang, J. (2021) · Journal of Computational Biology · doi:10.1089/cmb.2020.0416 · Cited by 9
Hernández, D. G., Sober, S. J., & Nemenman, I. M. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.68192 · Cited by 9
Temporal epistasis inference from more than 3 500 000 SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences
Zeng, H.-L., Liu, Y., Dichio, V., & Aurell, E. (2022) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.106.044409 · Cited by 9
Vigué, L., & Tenaillon, O. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2304177120 · Cited by 10
Bonds and bytes: The odyssey of structural biology
Hoff, S., Zinke, M. C., Izadi‐Pruneyre, N., & Bonomi, M. (2023) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102746 · Cited by 10
Evo‐Scope : Fully automated assessment of correlated evolution on phylogenetic trees
Godfroid, M., Coluzzi, C., Lambert, A., Glaser, P., Rocha, E. P. C., & Achaz, G. (2023) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.14190 · Cited by 9
Selection pressures on evolution of ribonuclease H explored with rigorous free–energy–based design
Hayes, R. L., Nixon, C. F., Marqusee, S., & Brooks, C. L. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2312029121 · Cited by 8
Estimating the proportion of beneficial mutations that are not adaptive in mammals
Latrille, T., Joseph, J., Hartasánchez, D. A., & Salamin, N. (2024) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011536 · Cited by 13
Epistasis Analysis Goes Genome-Wide
Zhang, J. (2017) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006558 · Cited by 10
Holland, J. E., Pan, Q., & Grigoryan, G. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199585 · Cited by 8
Designing bacterial signaling interactions with coevolutionary landscapes
Cheng, R. R., Haglund, E., Tiee, N. S., Morcos, F., Levine, H., Adams, J. A., Jennings, P. A., & Onuchic, J. N. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201734 · Cited by 10
Self-citationNadaradjane, A. A., Quignot, C., Traoré, S., Andréani, J., & Guérois, R. (2019) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25857 · Cited by 9
Wu, Z., Liu, H., Xu, L., Chen, H., & Feng, Y. F. (2019) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.201900948rr · Cited by 9
Inferring a network from dynamical signals at its nodes
Weistuch, C., Agozzino, L., Mujica-Parodi, L. R., & Dill, K. A. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008435 · Cited by 9
Inter-protein residue covariation information unravels physically interacting protein dimers
Salmanian, S., Pezeshk, H., & Sadeghi, M. (2020) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-020-03930-7 · Cited by 5
Murakowski, D. K., Barton, J. P., Peter, L. E., Chandrashekar, A., Bondzie, E. A., Gao, A., Barouch, D. H., & Chakraborty, A. K. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2022496118 · Cited by 9
New approaches to predict the effect of co-occurring variants on protein characteristics
Holcomb, D. D., Hamasaki‐Katagiri, N., Laurie, K., Katneni, U., Kames, J. M., Alexaki, A., Bar, H., & Kimchi‐Sarfaty, C. (2021) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.06.011 · Cited by 9
Inter-Residue Distance Prediction From Duet Deep Learning Models
Zhang, H., Huang, Y., Bei, Z., Ju, Z., Meng, J., Hao, M., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., & Xi, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.887491 · Cited by 9
Computational compensatory mutation discovery approach: Predicting a PARP1 variant rescue mutation
Ravishankar, K., Jiang, X., Leddin, E. M., Morcos, F., & Cisneros, G. A. (2022) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2022.05.036 · Cited by 10
Self-citationKelly, M. S., Macke, A. C., Kahawatte, S., Stump, J. E., Miller, A. R., & Dima, R. I. (2023) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0139273 · Cited by 8
Simulating Biomolecular Folding and Function by Native‐Structure‐Based/Go‐Type Models
Sinner, C., Lutz, B., John, S., Reinartz, I., Verma, A., & Schug, A. H. (2014) · Israel Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1002/ijch.201400012 · Cited by 10
Inverse Ising inference with correlated samples
Obermayer, B., & Levine, E. (2014) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/12/123017 · Cited by 9
Protein docking with predicted constraints
Krippahl, L., & Barahona, P. (2015) · Algorithms for Molecular Biology · doi:10.1186/s13015-015-0036-6 · Cited by 9
Coevolution Analysis of HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein Complex
Rawi, R., Kunji, K. B., Haoudi, A., & Bensmail, H. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143245 · Cited by 9
SeqFeatR for the Discovery of Feature-Sequence Associations
Budeus, B., Timm, J., & Hoffmann, D. E. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146409 · Cited by 9
Jeong, C.-S., & Kim, D. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-0948-2 · Cited by 9
Resummed mean-field inference for strongly coupled data
Jacquin, H., & Rançon, A. (2016) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.94.042118 · Cited by 9
Inference of Functionally-Relevant N-acetyltransferase Residues Based on Statistical Correlations
Neuwald, A. F., & Altschul, S. F. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005294 · Cited by 9
Baldessari, F., Capelli, R., Carloni, P., & Giorgetti, A. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.05.003 · Cited by 10
Protein Three-Dimensional Structure Prediction
Abeln, S., Feenstra, K. A., & Heringa, J. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809633-8.20505-0 · Cited by 9
Uncovering the non-equilibrium stationary properties in sparse Boolean networks
Torrisi, G., Kühn, R., & Annibale, A. (2022) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/ac66d0 · Cited by 9
The geometry of hidden representations of protein language modelsPreprint
Lucrezia, V., Cuturello, F., Ansuini, A., & Cazzaniga, A. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.10.24.513504 · Cited by 12
Chen, K., Litfin, T., Singh, J., Zhan, J., & Zhou, Y. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.02.01.526559 · Cited by 9
Inverse Potts model improves accuracy of phylogenetic profiling
Fukunaga, T., & Iwasaki, W. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac034 · Cited by 8
Impact of phylogeny on structural contact inference from protein sequence data
Dietler, N., Lupo, U., & Bitbol, A.-F. (2023) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2022.0707 · Cited by 6
Kandathil, S. M., Greener, J. G., Lau, A. M., & Jones, D. T. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.11.27.401232 · Cited by 8
Gu, J., Sim, B. R., Li, J., Yu, Y., Qin, L., Wu, L., Liu, H., Xu, Y., Zhao, Y., & Nie, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.141233 · Cited by 8
Rewiring enzyme regulation: Allosteric drugs and predictive tools
Fidan, V. G., Ilim, K., Gürsoy, A., Ozkan, S. B., & Keskin, Ö. (2025) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103159 · Cited by 9
Liu, C., Kenney, T., Beiko, R. G., & Gu, H. (2022) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syac052 · Cited by 9
Kennedy, E. N., Foster, C. A., Barr, S. A., & Bourret, R. B. (2022) · Biochemical Society Transactions · doi:10.1042/bst20220849 · Cited by 8
Deep-learning-based design of synthetic orthologs of SH3 signaling domains
Lian, X., Praljak, N., Subramanian, S., Wasinger, S., Ranganathan, R., & Ferguson, A. L. (2024) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2024.07.005 · Cited by 16
Fast and Functional Structured Data Generators Rooted in Out-of-Equilibrium Physics
Carbone, A., Decelle, A., Rosset, L., & Seoane, B. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3495999 · Cited by 10
The evolution of logic circuits for the purpose of protein contact map prediction
Chapman, S., Adami, C., Wilke, C. O., & KC, D. B. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.3139 · Cited by 8
Chakraborty, H. J., Gangopadhyay, A., Ganguli, S., & Datta, A. (2017) · Advances in bioinformatics and biomedical engineering book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2607-0.ch003 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Morcos, F., Pagnani, A., Lunt, B., Bertolino, A., Marks, D. S., Sander, C., Zecchina, R., Onuchic, J. N., Hwa, T., & Weigt, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Politecnico di Torino (IT)
- Institute for Scientific Interchange (IT)
- Harvard University (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0374;
- Biologie Computationnelle, Quantitative et Synthétique (FR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2011-11-21
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- E1293-301
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC3241805
- OpenAlex
- W2008545402
- Cited by
- 1,434
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 93 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 145 · 2021: 142 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 18.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
- PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM106303)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- direct coupling analysis, residue coevolution, protein contact prediction, native contacts, protein domains, homologous sequences, domain-domain interactions, protein oligomers, protein complex formation, de novo protein structure prediction, contact maps
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Amino Acids, Binding Sites, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Reproducibility of Results, Computational Biology, Protein Interaction Mapping, Protein Multimerization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review