Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The rational design of a synthetic polymer nanoparticle that neutralizes a toxic peptide in vivo

Open access
Hoshino, Yu, Koide, Hiroyuki, Furuya, Keiichi, Haberaecker, Walter W., Lee, Shih-Hui, Kodama, Takashi, Kanazawa, Hiroaki, Oku, Naoto, Shea, Kenneth J.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Synthetic polymer nanoparticles (NPs) that bind venomous molecules and neutralize their function in vivo are of significant interest as “plastic antidotes.” Recently, procedures to synthesize polymer NPs with affinity for target peptides have been reported. However, the performance of synthetic materials in vivo is a far greater challenge. Particle size, surface charge, and hydrophobicity affect not only the binding affinity and capacity to the target toxin but also the toxicity of NPs and the creation of a “corona” of proteins around NPs that can alter and or suppress the intended performance. Here, we report the design rationale of a plastic antidote for in vivo applications. Optimizing the choice and ratio of functional monomers incorporated in the NP maximized the binding affinity and capacity toward a target peptide. Biocompatibility tests of the NPs in vitro and in vivo revealed the importance of tuning surface charge and hydrophobicity to minimize NP toxicity and prevent aggregation induced by nonspecific interactions with plasma proteins. The toxin neutralization capacity of NPs in vivo showed a strong correlation with binding affinity and capacity in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo imaging experiments established the NPs accelerate clearance of the toxic peptide and eventually accumulate in macrophages in the liver. These results provide a platform to design plastic antidotes and reveal the potential and possible limitations of using synthetic polymer nanoparticles as plastic antidotes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1112828109

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Hoshino, Y., Koide, H., Furuya, K., Haberaecker, W. W., Lee, S.-H., Kodama, T., Kanazawa, H., Oku, N., & Shea, K. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-12-22
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
33-38
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2065203849
Cited by
201
References
3
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The rational design of a synthetic polymer nanoparticle that neutralizes a toxic peptide in vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1112828109
The paper
Hoshino, Y., Koide, H., Furuya, K., Haberaecker, W. W., Lee, S.-H., Kodama, T., Kanazawa, H., Oku, N., & Shea, K. J. (2012). The rational design of a synthetic polymer nanoparticle that neutralizes a toxic peptide in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1112828109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.