The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Refactoring the nitrogen fixation gene cluster from Klebsiella oxytoca
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial genes associated with a single trait are often grouped in a contiguous unit of the genome known as a gene cluster. It is difficult to genetically manipulate many gene clusters because of complex, redundant, and integrated host regulation. We have developed a systematic approach to completely specify the genetics of a gene cluster by rebuilding it from the bottom up using only synthetic, well-characterized parts. This process removes all native regulation, including that which is undiscovered. First, all noncoding DNA, regulatory proteins, and nonessential genes are removed. The codons of essential genes are changed to create a DNA sequence as divergent as possible from the wild-type (WT) gene. Recoded genes are computationally scanned to eliminate internal regulation. They are organized into operons and placed under the control of synthetic parts (promoters, ribosome binding sites, and terminators) that are functionally separated by spacer parts. Finally, a controller consisting of genetic sensors and circuits regulates the conditions and dynamics of gene expression. We applied this approach to an agriculturally relevant gene cluster from Klebsiella oxytoca encoding the nitrogen fixation pathway for converting atmospheric N 2 to ammonia. The native gene cluster consists of 20 genes in seven operons and is encoded in 23.5 kb of DNA. We constructed a “refactored” gene cluster that shares little DNA sequence identity with WT and for which the function of every genetic part is defined. This work demonstrates the potential for synthetic biology tools to rewrite the genetics encoding complex biological functions to facilitate access, engineering, and transferability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems
Purnick, P. E. M., & Weiss, R. (2009) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2698 · Cited by 1,181
An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits
Alon, U. (2019) · doi:10.1201/9780429283321 · Cited by 955
Cited by
A Highly Characterized Yeast Toolkit for Modular, Multipart Assembly
Lee, M. E., DeLoache, W. C., Cervantes, B., & Dueber, J. E. (2015) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/sb500366v · Cited by 916
Large-scale de novo DNA synthesis: technologies and applications
Kosuri, S., & Church, G. M. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2918 · Cited by 869
Small molecules from the human microbiota
Donia, M. S., & Fischbach, M. A. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1254766 · Cited by 760
Benzodiazepines: use, abuse, and consequences.
Woods, J. H., Katz, J. L., & Winger, G. (1992) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(25)00468-5 · Cited by 560
Liew, F., Martin, M. E., Tappel, R. C., Heijstra, B. D., Mihalcea, C., & Köpke, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00694 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Temme, K., Zhao, D., & Voigt, C. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-04-16
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7085-7090
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2086232077
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refactoring the nitrogen fixation gene cluster from Klebsiella oxytoca. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1120788109
- The paper
- Temme, K., Zhao, D., & Voigt, C. A. (2012). Refactoring the nitrogen fixation gene cluster from Klebsiella oxytoca. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120788109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.