The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional single-cell hybridoma screening using droplet-based microfluidics
Open accessAbstract
Monoclonal antibodies can specifically bind or even inhibit drug targets and have hence become the fastest growing class of human therapeutics. Although they can be screened for binding affinities at very high throughput using systems such as phage display, screening for functional properties (e.g., the inhibition of a drug target) is much more challenging. Typically these screens require the generation of immortalized hybridoma cells, as well as clonal expansion in microtiter plates over several weeks, and the number of clones that can be assayed is typically no more than a few thousand. We present here a microfluidic platform allowing the functional screening of up to 300,000 individual hybridoma cell clones within less than a day. This approach should also be applicable to nonimmortalized primary B-cells, as no cell proliferation is required: Individual cells are encapsulated into aqueous microdroplets and assayed directly for the release of antibodies inhibiting a drug target based on fluorescence. We used this system to perform a model screen for antibodies that inhibit angiotensin converting enzyme 1, a target for hypertension and congestive heart failure drugs. When cells expressing these antibodies were spiked into an unrelated hybridoma cell population in a ratio of 1∶10,000 we observed a 9,400-fold enrichment after fluorescence activated droplet sorting. A wide variance in antibody expression levels at the single-cell level within a single hybridoma line was observed and high expressors could be successfully sorted and recultivated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Corti, D., Voss, J., Gamblin, S. J., Codoni, G., Macagno, A., Jarrossay, D., Vachieri, S. G., Pinna, D., Minola, A., Vanzetta, F., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1205669 · Cited by 1,203
Cited by
Cao, Y., Su, B., Guo, X., Sun, W., Deng, Y., Bao, L., Zhu, Q., Zhang, X., Zheng, Y., Geng, C., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.025 · Cited by 1,188
Active droplet sorting in microfluidics: a review
Xi, H.-D., Zheng, H., Guo, W., Gañán-Calvo, A. M., Ai, Y., Tsao, C.-W., Zhou, J., Li, W., Huang, Y., Nguyen, N.-T., et al. (2017) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c6lc01435f · Cited by 369
Microfluidics: reframing biological enquiry
Duncombe, T. A., Tentori, A. M., & Herr, A. E. (2015) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm4041 · Cited by 345
Single-cell deep phenotyping of IgG-secreting cells for high-resolution immune monitoring
Eyer, K., Doineau, R. C. L., Castrillon, C. E., Briseño-Roa, L., Menrath, V., Mottet, G., England, P., Godina, A., Brient-Litzler, E., Nizak, C., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3964 · Cited by 264
Self-citationDevelopment and future of droplet microfluidics
Nan, L., Zhang, H., Weitz, D. A., & Shum, H. C. (2024) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/d3lc00729d · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Debs, B. E., Utharala, R., Balyasnikova, I. V., Griffiths, A. D., & Merten, C. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-07-02
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 11570-11575
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2062857909
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional single-cell hybridoma screening using droplet-based microfluidics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1204514109
- The paper
- Debs, B. E., Utharala, R., Balyasnikova, I. V., Griffiths, A. D., & Merten, C. A. (2012). Functional single-cell hybridoma screening using droplet-based microfluidics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204514109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.