Cited by 278Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Cell-type homologies and the origins of the neocortex

Open access
Dugas-Ford, Jennifer, Rowell, Joanna J., Ragsdale, Clifton W.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The six-layered neocortex is a uniquely mammalian structure with evolutionary origins that remain in dispute. One long-standing hypothesis, based on similarities in neuronal connectivity, proposes that homologs of the layer 4 input and layer 5 output neurons of neocortex are present in the avian forebrain, where they contribute to specific nuclei rather than to layers. We devised a molecular test of this hypothesis based on layer-specific gene expression that is shared across rodent and carnivore neocortex. Our findings establish that the layer 4 input and the layer 5 output cell types are conserved across the amniotes, but are organized into very different architectures, forming nuclei in birds, cortical areas in reptiles, and cortical layers in mammals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1204773109

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the three animal groups these brain regions have comparable gene-expression patterns (by EAG2, RORB, ER81, PCP4), as well as comparable afferent and efferent connections.

    “in the three animal groups these brain regions have comparable gene-expression patterns (by EAG2, RORB, ER81, PCP4), as well as comparable afferent and efferent connections”

    From The evolutionary and genetic origins of consciousness in the Cambrian Period over 500 million years ago (2013) · cites this paper as Dugas-Ford et al., 2012

    The Results (Fig. 2 and the turtle-cortex passages; page unavailable) report comparable input/output cell-type markers in mammals, birds, and turtles, including EAG2, RORB, and ER81, and describe corresponding thalamic inputs. They also describe brainstem-directed outputs in mammals and birds. The copy does not establish comparable efferent connections in turtles, and PCP4 expression is reported for mammals and birds but not turtles. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The new studies revealed a nearly identical internal microcircuitry in birds and mammals.

    “the new studies revealed a nearly identical internal microcircuitry in birds and mammals.”

    From The evolutionary and genetic origins of consciousness in the Cambrian Period over 500 million years ago (2013) · cites this paper as Dugas-Ford et al., 2012

    The Results describe a shared core circuit of sensory input and brainstem-directed output neurons, and the Discussion reports corresponding connectional and molecular cell-type properties in birds and mammals. But the Discussion emphasizes substantial differences in how those neurons are arranged—layers in mammals versus nuclei in birds—so the paper does not establish that their internal microcircuitry is nearly identical. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [31]Ulinski PS (1990) The cerebral cortex of reptiles. Cerebral Cortex , eds Jones EG, Peters A (Plenum, New York), Vol 8A, pp 139 -216.
  2. [35]Desan PH (1988) The organization of the cerebral cortex of the pond turtle, Pseudemys scripta elegans . PhD dissertation (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA).
  3. [50]Murphy WJ, Pringle TH, Crider TA, Springer MS, Miller W (2007) Using genomic data to unravel the root of the placental mammal phylogeny. Genome Res 17:413 -421.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dugas-Ford, J., Rowell, J. J., & Ragsdale, C. W.
Affiliations
  • Department of Neurobiology and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-10
Volume
109
Issue
42
Pages
16974-16979
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2022105630
Cited by
278
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
neocortex evolution, avian forebrain, neuronal connectivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Birds, Biological Evolution, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Mammals, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Reptiles, Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Primers, DNA, Complementary, Neocortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review