Cited by 150Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorLanguage and cultural evolutionGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Brain evolution by brain pathway duplication

Open access
Chakraborty, Mukta, Jarvis, Erich D.·2015·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of evolution of brain pathways for complex behaviours is still in its infancy. Making further advances requires a deeper understanding of brain homologies, novelties and analogies. It also requires an understanding of how adaptive genetic modifications lead to restructuring of the brain. Recent advances in genomic and molecular biology techniques applied to brain research have provided exciting insights into how complex behaviours are shaped by selection of novel brain pathways and functions of the nervous system. Here, we review and further develop some insights to a new hypothesis on one mechanism that may contribute to nervous system evolution, in particular by brain pathway duplication. Like gene duplication, we propose that whole brain pathways can duplicate and the duplicated pathway diverge to take on new functions. We suggest that one mechanism of brain pathway duplication could be through gene duplication, although other mechanisms are possible. We focus on brain pathways for vocal learning and spoken language in song-learning birds and humans as example systems. This view presents a new framework for future research in our understanding of brain evolution and novel behavioural traits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2015.0056

Cites

179 of 179 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Songbirds and parrots independently evolved vocal learning pathways by duplication of preexisting, surrounding motor circuits.

    “Second, analyses of brain gene expression profiles strongly suggest that songbirds and parrots independently evolved vocal learning pathways by duplication of preexisting, surrounding motor circuits (57, 58).”

    From Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain (2016) · cites this paper as [58]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 189 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [3]Merker B 2012 The vocal learning constellation: imitation, ritual culture, encephalization. In Music, language, and human evolution (ed. Bannan N), pp. 215–259 Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  2. [22]Kaas JH 1989 The evolution of complex sensory systems in mammals. J. Exp. Biol. 146, 165– 176. 2689560
  3. [32]von Economo C 1929 The cytoarchitectonics of the human cortex. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  4. [36]Finlay BL, Cheung D, Darlington RB 2005 Developmental constraints on or developmental structure in brain evolution? In Attention and performance XXI ‘process of change in brain and cognitive development’ (eds Munakata Y, Johnson M), pp. 131– 162. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  5. [125]Friel JP, Wainwright PC 1999 Evolution of complexity in motor patterns and jaw musculature of tetraodontiform fishes. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 867– 880. 10069976
  6. [127]Lauder GV 1993 Design of the aquatic vertebrate skull: major patterns and their evolutionary interpretations. In The skull (eds Hanken J, Hall BK), pp. 113– 149. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chakraborty, M., & Jarvis, E. D.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chakraborty, Mukta
  • Jarvis, Erich D.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2015-12-19
Volume
370
Issue
1684
Pages
20150056
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2193504960
Cited by
150
References
189
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DukeSpace (Duke University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
brain evolution, gene duplication, vocal learning, song learning, spoken language, complex behavior, nervous system evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Brain, Biological Evolution, Humans, Neural Pathways, Vocalization, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review