Cited by 412Social and Intergroup PsychologyCategorization, perception, and languageChild and Animal Learning Development

Cultural transmission of social essentialism

Open access
Rhodes, Marjorie, Leslie, Sarah-Jane, Tworek, Christina M.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Social essentialism entails the belief that certain social categories (e.g., gender, race) mark fundamentally distinct kinds of people. Essentialist beliefs have pernicious consequences, supporting social stereotyping and contributing to prejudice. How does social essentialism develop? In the studies reported here, we tested the hypothesis that generic language facilitates the cultural transmission of social essentialism. Two studies found that hearing generic language about a novel social category diverse for race, ethnicity, age, and sex led 4-y-olds and adults to develop essentialist beliefs about that social category. A third study documented that experimentally inducing parents to hold essentialist beliefs about a novel social category led them to produce more generic language when discussing the category with their children. Thus, generic language facilitates the transmission of essentialist beliefs about social categories from parents to children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1208951109

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]Carlson GN, Pelletier FJ. The Generic Book. Chicago: Chicago Univ Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rhodes, M., Leslie, S.-J., & Tworek, C. M.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-08-06
Volume
109
Issue
34
Pages
13526-13531
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2064143191
Cited by
412
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
44.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
social essentialism, cultural transmission, generic language, social categorization, social stereotyping, prejudice, children's beliefs, race, age, sex
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Culture, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Prejudice, Social Behavior, Social Identification, Social Perception, Stereotyping, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review