Cited by 563Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationCategorization, perception, and languageLogic, Reasoning, and Knowledge

Generics: Cognition and Acquisition

Leslie, Sarah-Jane·2008·The Philosophical Review

Abstract

`Ducks lay eggs' is a true sentence, and `ducks are female' is a false one. Similarly, `mosquitoes carry the West Nile virus' is obviously true, whereas `mosquitoes don't carry the West Nile virus' is patently false. This is so despite the egg-laying ducks' being a subset of the female ones and despite the number of mosquitoes that don't carry the virus being ninety-nine times the number that do. Puzzling facts such as these have made generic sentences defy adequate semantic treatment. However complex the truth conditions of generics appear to be, though, young children grasp generics more quickly and readily than seemingly simpler quantifiers such as `all' and `some'. I present an account of generics that not only illuminates the strange truth conditions of generics, but also explains how young children find them so comparatively easy to acquire. I then argue that generics give voice to our most cognitively primitive generalizations and that this hypothesis accounts for a variety of facts ranging from acquisition patterns to cross-linguistic data concerning the phonological articulation of operators. I go on to develop an account of the nature of these cognitively fundamental generalizations and argue that this account explains the strange truth-conditional behavior of generics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/00318108-2007-023

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leslie, S.-J.
Corresponding author
Leslie, Sarah-Jane
Venue
The Philosophical Review
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
117
Issue
1
Pages
1-47
ISSN
  • 0031-8108 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-1470
OpenAlex
W2011339838
Cited by
563
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 24
FWCI
71.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Philosophical Review (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
Keywords
generic sentences, truth conditions, child language acquisition, quantifiers, cross-linguistic variation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review