The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales
Open accessAbstract
Many wildlife species face imminent extinction because of human impacts, and therefore, a prevailing belief is that some wildlife species, particularly large carnivores and ungulates, cannot coexist with people at fine spatial scales (i.e., cannot regularly use the exact same point locations). This belief provides rationale for various conservation programs, such as resettling human communities outside protected areas. However, quantitative information on the capacity and mechanisms for wildlife to coexist with humans at fine spatial scales is scarce. Such information is vital, because the world is becoming increasingly crowded. Here, we provide empirical information about the capacity and mechanisms for tigers (a globally endangered species) to coexist with humans at fine spatial scales inside and outside Nepal’s Chitwan National Park, a flagship protected area for imperiled wildlife. Information obtained from field cameras in 2010 and 2011 indicated that human presence (i.e., people on foot and vehicles) was ubiquitous and abundant throughout the study site; however, tiger density was also high. Surprisingly, even at a fine spatial scale (i.e., camera locations), tigers spatially overlapped with people on foot and vehicles in both years. However, in both years, tigers offset their temporal activity patterns to be much less active during the day when human activity peaked. In addition to temporal displacement, tiger–human coexistence was likely enhanced by abundant tiger prey and low levels of tiger poaching. Incorporating fine-scale spatial and temporal activity patterns into conservation plans can help address a major global challenge—meeting human needs while sustaining wildlife.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Complexity of coupled human and natural systems
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., Lubchenco, J., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1144004 · Cited by 3,624
Self-citationAccelerated Human Population Growth at Protected Area Edges
Wittemyer, G., Elsen, P., Bean, W. T., Burton, A. C. O., & Brashares, J. S. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158900 · Cited by 731 · cited 1×
“, livestock grazing, natural resource collection, and hunting), although illicit, have increased enormously (5, 13).”
BackgroundHuman Population Density and Extinction Risk in the World's Carnivores
Cardillo, M., Purvis, A., Sechrest, W., Gittleman, J. L., Bielby, J., & Mace, G. M. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020197 · Cited by 618
Cited by
Framing Sustainability in a Telecoupled World
Liu, J., Hull, V., Batistella, M., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Fu, F., Hertel, T. W., Izaurralde, R. C., Lambin, E. F., Li, S., et al. (2013) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-05873-180226 · Cited by 1,099
Self-citationCo-Adaptation Is Key to Coexisting with Large Carnivores
Carter, N. H., & Linnell, J. D. C. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.05.006 · Cited by 641
Self-citationHuman–Wildlife Conflicts and the Need to Include Tolerance and Coexistence: An Introductory Comment
Frank, B. (2016) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1103388 · Cited by 223
Socioeconomic Benefits of Large Carnivore Recolonization Through Reduced Wildlife‐Vehicle Collisions
Gilbert, S. L., Sivy, K. J., Pozzanghera, C. B., DuBour, A., Overduijn, K., Smith, M. M., Zhou, J., Little, J. M., & Prugh, L. R. (2017) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12280 · Cited by 94
Diarrassouba, A., Gnagbo, A., Célestin Kouakou, Y., Campbell, G., Tiedoué, M. R., Tondossama, A., Kühl, H. S., & Koné, I. (2020) · African Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/aje.12680 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Carter, N. H., Shrestha, B. K., Karki, J. B., Pradhan, N. M. B., & Liu, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2012-09-04
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 15360-15365
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2149266717
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1210490109
- The paper
- Carter, N. H., Shrestha, B. K., Karki, J. B., Pradhan, N. M. B., & Liu, J. (2012). Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210490109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.