Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unique motifs and hydrophobic interactions shape the binding of modified DNA ligands to protein targets

Open access
Davies, Douglas R., Gelinas, Amy D., Zhang, Chi, Rohloff, John C., Carter, Jeffrey D., O’Connell, Daniel, Waugh, Sheela M., Wolk, Steven K., Mayfield, Wesley S., Burgin, Alex B., Edwards, Thomas E., Stewart, Lance J., Gold, Larry, Janjic, Nebojsa, Jarvis, Thale C.·2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Selection of aptamers from nucleic acid libraries by in vitro evolution represents a powerful method of identifying high-affinity ligands for a broad range of molecular targets. Nevertheless, a sizeable fraction of proteins remain difficult targets due to inherently limited chemical diversity of nucleic acids. We have exploited synthetic nucleotide modifications that confer protein-like diversity on a nucleic acid scaffold, resulting in a new generation of binding reagents called SOMAmers (Slow Off-rate Modified Aptamers). Here we report a unique crystal structure of a SOMAmer bound to its target, platelet-derived growth factor B (PDGF-BB). The SOMAmer folds into a compact structure and exhibits a hydrophobic binding surface that mimics the interface between PDGF-BB and its receptor, contrasting sharply with mainly polar interactions seen in traditional protein-binding aptamers. The modified nucleotides circumvent the intrinsic diversity constraints of natural nucleic acids, thereby greatly expanding the structural vocabulary of nucleic acid ligands and considerably broadening the range of accessible protein targets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1213933109

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Davies, D. R., Gelinas, A. D., Zhang, C., Rohloff, J. C., Carter, J. D., O’Connell, D., Waugh, S. M., Wolk, S. K., Mayfield, W. S., Burgin, A. B., Edwards, T. E., Stewart, L. J., Gold, L., Janjic, N., & Jarvis, T. C.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2012-11-08
Volume
109
Issue
49
Pages
19971-19976
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2029760928
Cited by
256
References
5
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unique motifs and hydrophobic interactions shape the binding of modified DNA ligands to protein targets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1213933109
The paper
Davies, D. R., Gelinas, A. D., Zhang, C., Rohloff, J. C., Carter, J. D., O’Connell, D., Waugh, S. M., Wolk, S. K., Mayfield, W. S., Burgin, A. B., Edwards, T. E., Stewart, L. J., Gold, L., Janjic, N., & Jarvis, T. C. (2012). Unique motifs and hydrophobic interactions shape the binding of modified DNA ligands to protein targets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213933109

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.