Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ambient mass spectrometry for the intraoperative molecular diagnosis of human brain tumors

Open access
Eberlin, Livia S., Norton, Isaiah, Orringer, Daniel, Dunn, Ian F., Liu, Xiaohui, Ide, Jennifer L., Jarmusch, Alan K., Ligon, Keith L., Jolesz, Ferenc A., Golby, Alexandra J., Santagata, Sandro, Agar, Nathalie Y. R., Cooks, R. Graham·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The main goal of brain tumor surgery is to maximize tumor resection while preserving brain function. However, existing imaging and surgical techniques do not offer the molecular information needed to delineate tumor boundaries. We have developed a system to rapidly analyze and classify brain tumors based on lipid information acquired by desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI-MS). In this study, a classifier was built to discriminate gliomas and meningiomas based on 36 glioma and 19 meningioma samples. The classifier was tested and results were validated for intraoperative use by analyzing and diagnosing tissue sections from 32 surgical specimens obtained from five research subjects who underwent brain tumor resection. The samples analyzed included oligodendroglioma, astrocytoma, and meningioma tumors of different histological grades and tumor cell concentrations. The molecular diagnosis derived from mass-spectrometry imaging corresponded to histopathology diagnosis with very few exceptions. Our work demonstrates that DESI-MS technology has the potential to identify the histology type of brain tumors. It provides information on glioma grade and, most importantly, may help define tumor margins by measuring the tumor cell concentration in a specimen. Results for stereotactically registered samples were correlated to preoperative MRI through neuronavigation, and visualized over segmented 3D MRI tumor volume reconstruction. Our findings demonstrate the potential of ambient mass spectrometry to guide brain tumor surgery by providing rapid diagnosis, and tumor margin assessment in near–real time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1215687110

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Eberlin, L. S., Norton, I., Orringer, D., Dunn, I. F., Liu, X., Ide, J. L., Jarmusch, A. K., Ligon, K. L., Jolesz, F. A., Golby, A. J., Santagata, S., Agar, N. Y. R., & Cooks, R. G.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-01-08
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
1611-1616
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2155888582
Cited by
288
References
26
FWCI
14.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ambient mass spectrometry for the intraoperative molecular diagnosis of human brain tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1215687110
The paper
Eberlin, L. S., Norton, I., Orringer, D., Dunn, I. F., Liu, X., Ide, J. L., Jarmusch, A. K., Ligon, K. L., Jolesz, F. A., Golby, A. J., Santagata, S., Agar, N. Y. R., & Cooks, R. G. (2013). Ambient mass spectrometry for the intraoperative molecular diagnosis of human brain tumors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215687110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.