Cited by 323Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisHousing Market and EconomicsFinancial Literacy and Behavior

Numerical ability predicts mortgage default

Open access
Gerardi, Kristopher, Goette, Lorenz, Meier, Stephan·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Unprecedented levels of US subprime mortgage defaults precipitated a severe global financial crisis in late 2008, plunging much of the industrialized world into a deep recession. However, the fundamental reasons for why US mortgages defaulted at such spectacular rates remain largely unknown. This paper presents empirical evidence showing that the ability to perform basic mathematical calculations is negatively associated with the propensity to default on one’s mortgage. We measure several aspects of financial literacy and cognitive ability in a survey of subprime mortgage borrowers who took out loans in 2006 and 2007, and match them to objective, detailed administrative data on mortgage characteristics and payment histories. The relationship between numerical ability and mortgage default is robust to controlling for a broad set of sociodemographic variables, and is not driven by other aspects of cognitive ability. We find no support for the hypothesis that numerical ability impacts mortgage outcomes through the choice of the mortgage contract. Rather, our results suggest that individuals with limited numerical ability default on their mortgage due to behavior unrelated to the initial choice of their mortgage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1220568110

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Numerical abilities are strongly negatively correlated with mortgage defaults.

    “Finally, Gerardi et al. (2013) find that numerical abilities-a skill set which is positively associated with financial sophistication-are strongly negatively correlated with mortgage defaults.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Gerardi et al. (2013)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerardi, K., Goette, L., & Meier, S.
Affiliations
  • Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (US)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-06-24
Volume
110
Issue
28
Pages
11267-11271
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2089543784
Cited by
323
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
77.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
Keywords
mortgage default, subprime mortgages, numerical ability, financial literacy, cognitive ability, 2008 financial crisis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review