CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 223Family Dynamics and RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMarriage and Family Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues

Open access
Cacioppo, John T., Cacioppo, Stephanie, Gonzaga, Gian C., Ogburn, Elizabeth L., VanderWeele, Tyler J.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1222447110PMC PMC3690854
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Marital discord is costly to children, families, and communities. The advent of the Internet, social networking, and on-line dating has affected how people meet future spouses, but little is known about the prevalence or outcomes of these marriages or the demographics of those involved. We addressed these questions in a nationally representative sample of 19,131 respondents who married between 2005 and 2012. Results indicate that more than one-third of marriages in America now begin on-line. In addition, marriages that began on-line, when compared with those that began through traditional off-line venues, were slightly less likely to result in a marital break-up (separation or divorce) and were associated with slightly higher marital satisfaction among those respondents who remained married. Demographic differences were identified between respondents who met their spouse through on-line vs. traditional off-line venues, but the findings for marital break-up and marital satisfaction remained significant after statistically controlling for these differences. These data suggest that the Internet may be altering the dynamics and outcomes of marriage itself.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1222447110

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 8 references

1 of the 8 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. KJ Gergen, MM Gergen, WH Barton, Deviance in the dark. Psychol Today 7, 129–130 (1973).
  2. J Houran, R Lange, JP Rentfrow, KH Bruckner, Do online matchmaking tests work? An assessment of preliminary evidence for a publicized “predictive model of marital success.”. N Am J Psychol 6, 507–526 (2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–221 of 221

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cacioppo, J. T., Cacioppo, S., Gonzaga, G. C., Ogburn, E. L., & VanderWeele, T. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Gestalt Research, Santa Monica, CA 90403; and
  • Harvard University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-06-03
Volume
110
Issue
25
Pages
10135-10140
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1222447110
PMC
PMC3690854
OpenAlex
W2167914004
Cited by
223
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
37.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES017876)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Family Dynamics
Keywords
online dating, marriage, marital satisfaction, divorce, separation, meeting venue, social networking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Data Collection, Divorce, Female, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Marriage, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Schools, Social Behavior, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Workplace, Young Adult, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review