The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unique insights into maternal mitochondrial inheritance in mice
Abstract
In animals, mtDNA is always transmitted through the female and this is termed “maternal inheritance.” Recently, autophagy was reported to be involved in maternal inheritance by elimination of paternal mitochondria and mtDNA in Caenorhabditis elegans ; moreover, by immunofluorescence, P62 and LC3 proteins were also found to colocalize to sperm mitochondria after fertilization in mice. Thus, it has been speculated that autophagy may be an evolutionary conserved mechanism for paternal mitochondrial elimination. However, by using two transgenic mouse strains, one bearing GFP-labeled autophagosomes and the other bearing red fluorescent protein-labeled mitochondria, we demonstrated that autophagy did not participate in the postfertilization elimination of sperm mitochondria in mice. Although P62 and LC3 proteins congregated to sperm mitochondria immediately after fertilization, sperm mitochondria were not engulfed and ultimately degraded in lysosomes until P62 and LC3 proteins disengaged from sperm mitochondria. Instead, sperm mitochondria unevenly distributed in blastomeres during cleavage and persisted in several cells until the morula stages. Furthermore, by using single sperm mtDNA PCR, we observed that most motile sperm that had reached the oviduct for fertilization had eliminated their mtDNA, leaving only vacuolar mitochondria. However, if sperm with remaining mtDNA entered the zygote, mtDNA was not eliminated and could be detected in newborn mice. Based on these results, we conclude that, in mice, maternal inheritance of mtDNA is not an active process of sperm mitochondrial and mtDNA elimination achieved through autophagy in early embryos, but may be a passive process as a result of prefertilization sperm mtDNA elimination and uneven mitochondrial distribution in embryos.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Moreover, GFP-LC3 puncta and LC3 lipidation can reflect the induction of a different/modified pathway such as LC3-associated phagocytosis (LAP) [20], or the noncanonical destruction pathway of paternal mitochondria after egg fertilization [21,22].”
From Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1 (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy
Klionsky, D. J., Abdalla, F. C., Abeliovich, H., Abraham, R. T., Acevedo-Arozena, A., Adeli, K., Agholme, L., Agnello, M., Agostinis, P., Aguirre-Ghiso, J. A., et al. (2012) · Autophagy · doi:10.4161/auto.19496 · Cited by 3,996
Self-citationKimura, S., Noda, T., & Yoshimori, T. (2007) · Autophagy · doi:10.4161/auto.4451 · Cited by 2,278
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- 10.1038/251536a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2010.09.003 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13859 · DOI
- 10.1093/humupd/dmh034 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1211878 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1210333 · DOI
- 10.1038/cr.2011.182 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0506911103 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.021 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/148.2.851 · DOI
- 10.1038/352255a0 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.92.10.4542 · DOI
- 10.1038/46466 · DOI
- 10.4161/auto.19243 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1215480 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4161/auto.5338 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0967199498000148 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199705)47:1<79::AID-MRD11>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.01602 · DOI
- AK Tarkowski, W Ozdzeński, R Czołowska, How many blastomeres of the 4-cell embryo contribute cells to the mouse body? Int J Dev Biol 45, 811–816 (2001).
- 10.1056/NEJMoa020350 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng0208-134 · DOI
- 10.1095/biolreprod.104.036095 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/deg096 · DOI
- 10.1095/biolreprod.109.080887 · DOI
- 10.1093/genetics/156.3.1277 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03842-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.004 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e03-09-0704 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1538/expanim.59.105 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1154822 · DOI
- 10.1093/humrep/des005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.056 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).
Klionsky, D. J., Abdelmohsen, K., Abe, A., Abedin, M. J., Abeliovich, H., Acevedo Arozena, A., Adachi, H., Adams, C. M., Adams, P. D., Adeli, K., et al. (2016) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356 · Cited by 5,894
Self-citationGuidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) 1
Klionsky, D. J., Abdel-Aziz, A. K., Abdelfatah, S., Abdellatif, M., Abdoli, A., Abel, S., Abeliovich, H., Abildgaard, M. H., Abudu, Y. P., Acevedo-Arozena, A., et al. (2021) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280 · Cited by 2,897
Self-citationMitophagy and Quality Control Mechanisms in Mitochondrial Maintenance
Pickles, S., Vigié, P., & Youle, R. J. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.004 · Cited by 2,081
Eaten alive: novel insights into autophagy from multicellular model systems
Zhang, H., & Baehrecke, E. H. (2015) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2015.03.001 · Cited by 102
Pyle, A., Hudson, G., Wilson, I. J., Coxhead, J., Smertenko, T., Herbert, M., Santibanez-Koref, M., & Chinnery, P. F. (2015) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005040 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, S.-M., Ge, Z.-J., Wang, Z.-W., Jiang, Z.-Z., Wang, Z.-B., Ouyang, Y.-C., Hou, Y., Schatten, H., & Sun, Q.-Y.
- Affiliations
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; and
- Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-07-22
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 13038-13043
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2013-10-25)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review