Cited by 512Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionStress Responses and CortisolTryptophan and brain disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A functional genomic perspective on human well-being

Open access
Fredrickson, Barbara L., Grewen, Karen M., Coffey, Kimberly A., Algoe, Sara B., Firestine, Ann M., Arevalo, Jesusa M. G., Ma, Jeffrey, Cole, Steven W.·2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

To identify molecular mechanisms underlying the prospective health advantages associated with psychological well-being, we analyzed leukocyte basal gene expression profiles in 80 healthy adults who were assessed for hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, as well as potentially confounded negative psychological and behavioral factors. Hedonic and eudaimonic well-being showed similar affective correlates but highly divergent transcriptome profiles. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from people with high levels of hedonic well-being showed up-regulated expression of a stress-related conserved transcriptional response to adversity (CTRA) involving increased expression of proinflammatory genes and decreased expression of genes involved in antibody synthesis and type I IFN response. In contrast, high levels of eudaimonic well-being were associated with CTRA down-regulation. Promoter-based bioinformatics implicated distinct patterns of transcription factor activity in structuring the observed differences in gene expression associated with eudaimonic well-being (reduced NF-κB and AP-1 signaling and increased IRF and STAT signaling). Transcript origin analysis identified monocytes, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and B lymphocytes as primary cellular mediators of these dynamics. The finding that hedonic and eudaimonic well-being engage distinct gene regulatory programs despite their similar effects on total well-being and depressive symptoms implies that the human genome may be more sensitive to qualitative variations in well-being than are our conscious affective experiences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1305419110

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. LA King, JA Hicks, Positive affect and meaning in life: The intersection of hedonism and eudaimonia. The Human Quest for Meaning, ed PT Wong (Routledge, New York), pp. 125–142 (2012).
  2. MH Antoni, et al., Transcriptional modulation of human leukocytes by cognitive-behavioral stress management in women undergoing treatment for breast cancer. Biol Psychiatry 71, 366–372 (2012).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 509

Metadata

Authors
Fredrickson, B. L., Grewen, K. M., Coffey, K. A., Algoe, S. B., Firestine, A. M., Arevalo, J. M. G., Ma, J., & Cole, S. W.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2013-07-29
Volume
110
Issue
33
Pages
13684-13689
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2155399165
Cited by
512
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 7
FWCI
63.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG107265, P30AG017265)
  • NIH Office of the Director (R01NR012899)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA116778)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (R01NR012899)
  • Common Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
psychological well-being, hedonic well-being, eudaimonic well-being, leukocyte gene expression, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, conserved transcriptional response to adversity, pro-inflammatory genes, type I interferon response, NF-κB signaling, AP-1 signaling, transcription factor activity, monocytes, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, B cells, depressive symptoms, stress response
MeSH terms
Adult, Antibodies, Happiness, Humans, Interferon Type I, Leukocytes, Mononuclear, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, North Carolina, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Transcription Factors, Genome, Human, NF-kappa B, Transcription Factor AP-1, Computational Biology, Gene Regulatory Networks, Pleasure, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review