The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
War, space, and the evolution of Old World complex societies
Abstract
Significance: How did human societies evolve from small groups, integrated by face-to-face cooperation, to huge anonymous societies of today? Why is there so much variation in the ability of different human populations to construct viable states? We developed a model that uses cultural evolution mechanisms to predict where and when the largest-scale complex societies should have arisen in human history. The model was simulated within a realistic landscape of the Afroeurasian landmass, and its predictions were tested against real data. Overall, the model did an excellent job predicting empirical patterns. Our results suggest a possible explanation as to why a long history of statehood is positively correlated with political stability, institutional quality, and income per capita.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In other words, social hierarchy and differences in material wealth show an increasing trend as one enters the Late Neolithic, up to the emergence of political complexity in the Old World38”
From Cultural hitchhiking and competition between patrilineal kin groups explain the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2018) · cites this paper as [38]
In the citing paper
“Farmer-herder interactions have been recognized as playing a key role in cultural change, such as in the creation of ideals of personal, mobile and alienable property72, or the rapid development of political complexity38.”
From Cultural hitchhiking and competition between patrilineal kin groups explain the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2018) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olson, M. (1965) · doi:10.4159/9780674041660 · Cited by 14,191
Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D'amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., et al. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:teotwa]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 8,488
The economic and social burden of malaria
Sachs, J., & Malaney, P. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415680a · Cited by 2,248
Did Warfare Among Ancestral Hunter-Gatherers Affect the Evolution of Human Social Behaviors?
Bowles, S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168112 · Cited by 773
Firearms: A Global History to 1700
Chase, K. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806681 · Cited by 143
Richerson, P., & Henrich, J. (2012) · Cliodynamics: The Journal of Quantitative History and Cultural Evolution · doi:10.21237/c7clio3112453 · Cited by 131
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- DT Campbell, The two distinct routes beyond kin selection to ultrasociality: Implications for the humanities and social sciences. The Nature of Prosocial Development: Theories and Strategies, ed D Bridgeman (Academic, New York), pp. 11–39 (1983).
- PJ Richerson, R Boyd, The evolution of human ultrasociality. Ethnic Conflict and Indoctrination, eds I Eibl-Eibesfeldt, FK Salter (Berghahn, Oxford), pp. 71–95 (1998).
- S Bowles Microeconomics: Behavior, Institutions, and Evolution (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ, 2004).
- F Fukuyama The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York, 2011).
- 10.1126/science.169.3947.733 · DOI
- 10.1515/9780804764513 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143823 · DOI
- 10.3998/jar.0521004.0062.301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4159/harvard.9780674064973 · DOI
- N Henrich, J Henrich Why Humans Cooperate: A Cultural and Evolutionary Explanation (Oxford Univ Press, New York, 2007). · DOI
- S Bowles, H Gintis A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ, 2011).
- Turchin P (2013) The puzzle of human ultrasociality: How did large-scale complex societies evolve? Cultural Evolution Strüngmann Forum Report eds Richerson PJ Christiansen MH (MIT Press Cambridge MA) Vol 12 pp 61–73. · DOI
- M Mann The Sources of Social Power. I. A History of Power from the Beginning to A.D. 1760 (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, 1986).
- 10.4159/harvard.9780674063099 · DOI
- 10.1086/522809 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226901374.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1182238 · DOI
- P Turchin Historical Dynamics: Why States Rise and Fall (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ, 2003).
- Lieberman V (2010) Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context c. 800–1830. Volume II: Mainland Mirrors Europe China South Asia and the Islands (Cambridge Univ Press Cambridge UL). · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226476278.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1017/S174002280900312X · DOI
- A Gat War in Human Civilization (Oxford Univ Press, New York, 2008).
- S Gavrilets, D Anderson, P Turchin, Cycling in the complexity of early societies. Cliodynamics 1, 58–80 (2010).
- JC Scott The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia (Yale Univ Press, New Haven, CT, 2009).
- 10.1017/S1740022810000057 · DOI
- D Christian A History of Russia, Central Asia, and Mongolia (Blackwell, Oxford, 1998).
- 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1020827801137 · DOI
- AJ Toynbee A Study of History (Oxford Univ Press, London) Vol 2 (1957).
- J Diamond Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies (Norton, New York, 1997).
- 10.1038/454034a · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09461 · DOI
Cited by
The cultural evolution of prosocial religions
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F., Gervais, W. M., Willard, A. K., McNamara, R. A., Slingerland, E., & Henrich, J. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x14001356 · Cited by 934
Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality
Purzycki, B. G., Apicella, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Cohen, E., McNamara, R. A., Willard, A. K., Xygalatas, D., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16980 · Cited by 494
“We tested this hypothesis using extensive ethnographic interviews and two behavioural games designed to measure impartial rule-following among people (n = 591, observations = 35,400) from eight diverse communities from around the world: (1) inland Tanna, Vanuatu; (2) coastal Tanna, Vanuatu; (3) Yasawa, Fiji; (4) Lovu,…”
MethodA framework for studying social complexity
Kappeler, P. M. (2019) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-018-2601-8 · Cited by 316
Stewardship of global collective behavior
Bak-Coleman, J. B., Alfano, M., Barfuss, W., Bergstrom, C. T., Centeno, M. A., Couzin, I. D., Donges, J. F., Galesic, M., Gersick, A. S., Jacquet, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2025764118 · Cited by 289
On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism
Dafoe, A. (2015) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243915579283 · Cited by 221
Acerbi, A., & Mesoudi, A. (2015) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-015-9490-2 · Cited by 198
Pursuing Darwin’s curious parallel: Prospects for a science of cultural evolution
Mesoudi, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1620741114 · Cited by 150
Zeng, T. C., Aw, A. J., & Feldman, M. W. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04375-6 · Cited by 121
The spread of technological innovations: effects of psychology, culture and policy interventions
Tverskoi, D., Babu, S., & Gavrilets, S. (2022) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.211833 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Turchin, P., Currie, T. E., Turner, E. A. L., & Gavrilets, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2013-09-23
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 16384-16389
- ISSN
- 0027-8424
- 1091-6490
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
