CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 334Agricultural Innovations and PracticesInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlAgricultural Development and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries

Open access
Parsa, Soroush, Morse, Stephen, Bonifacio, Alejandro, Chancellor, Timothy C. B., Condori, Bruno, Crespo-Pérez, Verónica, Hobbs, Shaun L. A., Kroschel, Jürgen, Ba, Malick N., Rebaudo, François, Sherwood, Stephen G., Vanek, Steven J., Faye, Emile, Herrera, Mario A., Dangles, Olivier·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1312693111PMC PMC3956194
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Significance: Integrated pest management (IPM) has been the dominant crop protection paradigm promoted globally since the 1960s. However, its adoption by developing country farmers is surprisingly low. This article reports 51 potential reasons why, identified and prioritized by hundreds of IPM professionals and practitioners around the world. Stakeholders from developing countries prioritized different adoption obstacles than those from high-income countries. Surprisingly, a few of the obstacles prioritized in developing countries appear to be overlooked by the literature. We suggest that a more vigorous analysis and discussion of the factors discouraging IPM adoption in developing countries may accelerate the progress needed to bring about its full potential.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1312693111

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. ; World Bank Sustainable Pest Management: Achievements and Challenges, Report 32 714–GBL (World Bank, Washington, DC, 2005).
  2. LP Pedigo, Closing the gap between IPM theory and practice. J Agric Entomol 12, 171–181 (1995).
  3. Nowak P Padgett S Hoban TJ (1996) Practical considerations in assessing barriers to IPM adoption. Proceedings of the Third National IPM Symposium: Broadening Support for 21st Century IPM . ERS Miscellaneous Publication (Citeseer Washington DC) pp 93–114.
  4. AJ Dreves, Village-level integrated pest management in developing countries. J Agric Entomol 13, 195–211 (1996).
  5. ; International Fund for Agricultural Development Rural Poverty Report 2011 (IFAD, Rome, 2010).
  6. DG Bottrell Integrated Pest Management (Council on Environmental Quality, Washington, DC, 1979).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–329 of 329

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Parsa, S., Morse, S., Bonifacio, A., Chancellor, T. C. B., Condori, B., Crespo-Pérez, V., Hobbs, S. L. A., Kroschel, J., Ba, M. N., Rebaudo, F., Sherwood, S. G., Vanek, S. J., Faye, E., Herrera, M. A., & Dangles, O.
Affiliations
  • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (KE)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Fundación para la Promoción e Investigación de Productos Andinos, Cochabamba, Bolivia;
  • Natural Resources Institute (GB)
  • International Potato Center (PE)
  • Escuela de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador;
  • CAB International (GB)
  • International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropic, Niamey, Niger;
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Unité Diversité, Évolution et Écologie des Insectes Tropicaux, Laboratoire Evolution, Génomes et Spéciation, 91198 Gif-sur Yvette Cedex, France;
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (EC)
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-02-24
Volume
111
Issue
10
Pages
3889-3894
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1312693111
PMC
PMC3956194
OpenAlex
W2099625864
Cited by
334
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 6
FWCI
64.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • McKnight Foundation
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
Keywords
integrated pest management, IPM adoption, barriers to adoption, developing countries, agricultural extension, stakeholder engagement, concept mapping
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Analysis of Variance, Community-Institutional Relations, Data Collection, Developing Countries, Education, Motivation, Pest Control, Professional Competence, Research, Cluster Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review