Cited by 257Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dopamine prediction error responses integrate subjective value from different reward dimensions

Open access
Lak, Armin, Stauffer, William R., Schultz, Wolfram·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Most real-world rewards have multiple dimensions, such as amount, risk, and type. Here we show that within a bounded set of such multidimensional rewards monkeys’ choice behavior fulfilled several core tenets of rational choice theory; namely, their choices were stochastically complete and transitive. As such, in selecting between rewards, the monkeys behaved as if they maximized value on a common scale. Dopamine neurons encoded prediction errors that reflected that scale. A particular reward dimension influenced dopamine activity only to the extent that it influenced choice. Thus, vastly different reward types such as juice and food activated dopamine neurons in accordance with subjective value derived from the different rewards. This neuronal signal could serve to update value signals for economic choice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1321596111

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–256 of 256

Metadata

Authors
Lak, A., Stauffer, W. R., & Schultz, W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-01-22
Volume
111
Issue
6
Pages
2343-2348
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2010297727
Cited by
257
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 13
FWCI
13.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (095495)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
dopamine, prediction error, subjective value, economic choice, reward magnitude, risk, reward type, single-unit recording, primate decision making, value integration, reinforcement learning
MeSH terms
Animals, Dopamine, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neurons, Probability, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review