Cited by 88Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Phasic dopamine signals: from subjective reward value to formal economic utility

Open access
Schultz, Wolfram, Carelli, Regina M, Wightman, R Mark·2015·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Although rewards are physical stimuli and objects, their value for survival and reproduction is subjective. The phasic, neurophysiological and voltammetric dopamine reward prediction error response signals subjective reward value. The signal incorporates crucial reward aspects such as amount, probability, type, risk, delay and effort. Differences of dopamine release dynamics with temporal delay and effort in rodents may derive from methodological issues and require further study. Recent designs using concepts and behavioral tools from experimental economics allow to formally characterize the subjective value signal as economic utility and thus to establish a neuronal value function. With these properties, the dopamine response constitutes a utility prediction error signal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.09.006

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dopaminergic signaling in the NAc has been widely studied for its involvement in motivational salience, behavioral reinforcement, and reward prediction error encoding.

    “Dopaminergic signaling in the NAc has been widely studied for its involvement in motivational salience, behavioral reinforcement, and reward prediction error encoding (Schultz et al., 2015; Berridge and Robinson, 2016; Watabe-Uchida et al., 2017; Berke, 2018).”

    From Ventral striatum dopamine release encodes unique properties of visual stimuli in mice (2023) · cites this paper as Schultz et al., 2015

    The Different rewards > Neurobiology section links reward prediction error responses to dopamine concentration changes in rat nucleus accumbens. The Temporal discounting > Neurobiology section also describes an influence of dopamine stimulation on behavioral learning and approach, consistent with the reinforcement part of the claim. The copy does not establish the claimed involvement of NAc dopamine in motivational salience. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Mas-Colell A Whinston M Green J Microeconomic Theory 1995 Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schultz, W., Carelli, R. M., & Wightman, R. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Schultz, Wolfram
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
5
Pages
147-154
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1853541416
Cited by
88
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (058365, 093270, 095495)
  • European Research Council (293549)
  • NIH (P50MH094258, DA034021, DA010900)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
dopamine, reward prediction error, economic utility, reward delay, effort, risk, probability, experimental economics, rodent behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review