Cited by 82Protein Structure and DynamicsDiffusion and Search DynamicsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

Both protein dynamics and ligand concentration can shift the binding mechanism between conformational selection and induced fit

Open access
Greives, Nicholas, Zhou, Huan-Xiang·2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

This study aimed to shed light on the long debate over whether conformational selection (CS) or induced fit (IF) is the governing mechanism for protein-ligand binding. The main difference between the two scenarios is whether the conformational transition of the protein from the unbound form to the bound form occurs before or after encountering the ligand. Here we introduce the IF fraction (i.e., the fraction of binding events achieved via IF), to quantify the binding mechanism. Using simulations of a model protein-ligand system, we demonstrate that both the rate of the conformational transition and the concentration of ligand molecules can affect the IF fraction. CS dominates at slow conformational transition and low ligand concentration. An increase in either quantity results in a higher IF fraction. Despite the many-body nature of the system and the involvement of multiple, disparate types of dynamics (i.e., ligand diffusion, protein conformational transition, and binding reaction), the overall binding kinetics over wide ranges of parameters can be fit to a single exponential, with the apparent rate constant exhibiting a linear dependence on ligand concentration. The present study may guide future kinetics experiments and dynamics simulations in determining the IF fraction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1407545111

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence points to the conformational selection binding mechanism, which allows one to precompute the conformational ensemble of the interacting molecule(s) and dock the separate conformers with limited conformational search.

    “In a long-standing debate between the proponents of the “induced-fit” and the “conformational selection” binding mechanisms [21–23], the evidence pointing to the latter allows one to precompute the conformational ensemble of the interacting molecule(s) and dock the separate conformers with limited conformational search [24,25].”

    From Challenges in protein docking (2020) · cites this paper as [23]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Perutz MF (1970) Stereochemistry of cooperative effects in haemoglobin. Nature 228(5273):726-739.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greives, N., & Zhou, H.-X.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2014-06-30
Volume
111
Issue
28
Pages
10197-10202
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2040934203
Cited by
82
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 58187, R01GM058187)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Diffusion and Search Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
protein-ligand binding, conformational selection, induced fit, binding mechanism, ligand concentration, binding kinetics, apparent rate constant, ligand diffusion, protein dynamics
MeSH terms
Kinetics, Ligands, Models, Chemical, Proteins, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review