Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Statistical universals reveal the structures and functions of human music

Savage, Patrick E., Brown, Steven, Sakai, Emi, Currie, Thomas E.·2015·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1414495112
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Significance: Which features of music are universal and which are culture-specific? Why? These questions are important for understanding why humans make music but have rarely been scientifically tested. We used musical classification techniques and statistical tools to analyze a global set of 304 music recordings, finding no absolute universals but dozens of statistical universals. These include not only commonly cited features related to pitch and rhythm but also domains such as social context and interrelationships between musical features. We speculate that group coordination is the common aspect unifying the cross-cultural structural regularities of human music, with implications for the study of music evolution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1414495112

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. DE Brown Human Universals (Temple Univ Press, Philadelphia, 1991).
  2. Vandor I ed (1977) Universals. World of Music 19(1–2):1–129.
  3. T Van Khe, Is the pentatonic universal? A few reflections on pentatonism. World of Music 19, 76–85 (1977).
  4. GF Miller The Origins of Music, eds NL Wallin, B Merker, S Brown (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 329–360 (2000).
  5. Brown S (2000) Evolution Culture and Behavior eds Tonneau F Thompson NS Perspectives in Ethology (Plenum New York) Vol 13 pp 231–281.
  6. S Brown The Origins of Music, eds NL Wallin, B Merker, S Brown (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), pp. 271–300 (2000).

Cited by

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
Savage, P. E., Brown, S., Sakai, E., & Currie, T. E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Musicology, Tokyo University of the Arts, 110-8714 Tokyo, Japan;
  • Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4K1;
  • Centre for Ecology & Conservation, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Cornwall TR10 9FE, United Kingdom
ORCID
Savage, Patrick E.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2015-06-29
Volume
112
Issue
29
Pages
8987-8992
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1414495112
Cited by
440
References
84
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.