The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being
Open accessAbstract
Significance: Environmental management inevitably involves trade-offs among different objectives, values, and stakeholders. Most evaluations of such trade-offs involve monetary valuation or calculation of aggregate production of ecosystem services, which can mask individual winners and losers. We combine a participatory, modeling, and scenarios approach to identify social–ecological trade-offs in a tropical fishery and the implications on well-being of different stakeholders. Such trade-offs are often ignored because losers are marginalized or not represented by quantification, and because the nature of underlying values may result in socially “taboo” trade-offs that pit incommensurable values against one another. A participatory modeling and scenarios approach can increase awareness of such trade-offs, promote discussion of what is socially acceptable, and potentially identify and reduce obstacles to compliance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
(2012) · Strategic Environmental Assessment · doi:10.4324/9781849772631-19 · Cited by 2,617
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x · Cited by 2,355
Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
Carpenter, S. R., Mooney, H. A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R. S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A. K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H. M., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808772106 · Cited by 2,257
Ecosystems and Human well-being
Butler, C. D., Chambers, R., Chopra, K., Dasgupta, P. S., Duraiappah, A. K., Kumar, P., McMichael, A. J., & Wells, J. (2003) · Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) · Cited by 1,917
Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services
Rodríguez, J. P., Beard, Jr., Bennett, E. M., Cumming, G. S., Cork, S. J., Agard, J., Dobson, A. P., & Peterson, G. D. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01667-110128 · Cited by 1,430
Self-citationWhere are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement
Chan, K. M. A., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R., Halpern, B. S., et al. (2012) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7 · Cited by 1,057
Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions
Tetlock, P. E. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00135-9 · Cited by 915
Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being
McShane, T. O., Hirsch, P. D., Trung, T. C., Songorwa, A. N., Kinzig, A., Monteferri, B., Mutekanga, D., Thang, H. V., Dammert, J. L., Pulgar-Vidal, M., et al. (2011) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.038 · Cited by 907
Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions
Goldstein, J. H., Caldarone, G., Duarte, T. K., Ennaanay, D., Hannahs, N., Mendoza, G., Polasky, S., Wolny, S., & Daily, G. C. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1201040109 · Cited by 729
Cited by
Folke, C. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09088-210444 · Cited by 982
Building adaptive capacity to climate change in tropical coastal communities
Cinner, J. E., Adger, W. N., Allison, E. H., Barnes, M. L., Brown, K., Cohen, P. J., Gelcich, S., Hicks, C. C., Hughes, T. P., Lau, J., et al. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0065-x · Cited by 770
Self-citationAssessing ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies: The need for a more mechanistic approach
Dade, M. C., Mitchell, M. G. E., McAlpine, C. A., & Rhodes, J. R. (2019) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-018-1127-7 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Daw, T. M., Coulthard, S., Cheung, W. W. L., Brown, K., Abunge, C., Galafassi, D., Peterson, G. D., McClanahan, T. R., Omukoto, J. O., & Munyi, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2015-05-18
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 6949-6954
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W1800525380
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 28.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.1414900112
- The paper
- Daw, T. M., Coulthard, S., Cheung, W. W. L., Brown, K., Abunge, C., Galafassi, D., Peterson, G. D., McClanahan, T. R., Omukoto, J. O., & Munyi, L. (2015). Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414900112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
