The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cocaine sensitization and reward are under the influence of circadian genes and rhythm
Open accessAbstract
Investigations using the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster have shown that the circadian clock gene period ( Per ) can influence behavioral responses to cocaine. Here we show that the mouse homologues of the Drosophila Per gene, mPer1 and mPer2 , modulate cocaine sensitization and reward, two phenomena extensively studied in humans and animals because of their importance for drug abuse. In response to an acute cocaine injection mPer1 and mPer2 mutant mice as well as wild-type mice exhibited an approximately 5-fold increase in activity compared with saline control levels, showing that there is no initial difference in sensitivity to acute cocaine administration in Per mutants. After repeated cocaine injections wild-type mice exhibited a sensitized behavioral response that was absent in mPer1 knockout mice. In contrast, mPer2 mutant mice exhibited a hypersensitized response to cocaine. Conditioned place preference experiments revealed similar behavioral reactions: mPer1 knockout mice showed a complete lack of cocaine reward whereas mPer2 mutants showed a strong cocaine-induced place preference. In another set of experiments, we tested C57/BL6J mice at different Zeitgeber times and found that cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization and place preference are under the control of the circadian clock. In conclusion, we demonstrate that processes involved in cocaine addiction depend on the circadian rhythm and are modulated in an opposing manner by mPer1 and mPer2 genes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction
Robinson, T. (1993) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-p · Cited by 7,346
Clock Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster
Konopka, R. J., & Benzer, S. (1971) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.68.9.2112 · Cited by 2,280
Molecular analysis of mammalian circadian rhythms
Reppert, S. M., & Weaver, D. R. (2001) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.63.1.647 · Cited by 1,444
Mammalian Cry1 and Cry2 are essential for maintenance of circadian rhythms
Horst, G. T. J. V. D., Muijtjens, M., Kobayashi, K., Takano, R., Kanno, S.-I., Takao, M., Wit, J. D., Verkerk, A., Eker, A. P. M., Leenen, D. V., et al. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19323 · Cited by 1,402
Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J., & Kalivas, P. W. (2000) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130000493 · Cited by 1,346
Tzschentke, T. M. (1998) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00060-4 · Cited by 1,266
The dopamine hypothesis of reward: past and current status
Spanagel, R., & Weiss, F. (1999) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01447-2 · Cited by 973
Self-citationNonredundant roles of the mPer1 and mPer2 genes in the mammalian circadian clock.
Zheng, B., Albrecht, U., Kaasik, K., Sage, M., Lu, W., Vaishnav, S., Li, Q., Sun, Z. S., Eichele, G., Bradley, A., et al. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00380-4 · Cited by 900
Self-citationDifferential Functions of mPer1, mPer2, and mPer3 in the SCN Circadian Clock
Bae, K., Jin, X., Maywood, E. S., Hastings, M. H., Reppert, S. M., & Weaver, D. R. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00302-6 · Cited by 900
Circadian oscillation of a mammalian homologue of the Drosophila period gene
Tei, H., Okamura, H., Shigeyoshi, Y., Fukuhara, C., Ozawa, R., Hirose, M., & Sakaki, Y. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/39086 · Cited by 792
Cited by
Dibner, C., Schibler, U., & Albrecht, U. (2010) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135821 · Cited by 2,421
Self-citationThe mesolimbic dopamine reward circuit in depression
Nestler, E. J., & Carlezon, W. A. (2006) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.018 · Cited by 2,059
Tzschentke, T. M. (2007) · Addiction Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1369-1600.2007.00070.x · Cited by 1,336
Timing to perfection: the biology of central and peripheral circadian clocks
Albrecht, U. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.006 · Cited by 915
Self-citationSleep disturbance as transdiagnostic: Consideration of neurobiological mechanisms
Harvey, A. G., Murray, G., Chandler, R. A., & Soehner, A. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.003 · Cited by 609
Metadata
- Authors
- Abarca, C., Albrecht, U., & Spanagel, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2002-06-25
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 9026-9030
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- OpenAlex
- W2169938627
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 5.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cocaine sensitization and reward are under the influence of circadian genes and rhythm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1073/pnas.142039099
- The paper
- Abarca, C., Albrecht, U., & Spanagel, R. (2002). Cocaine sensitization and reward are under the influence of circadian genes and rhythm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.142039099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.