The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioral idiosyncrasy reveals genetic control of phenotypic variability
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Significance: If we could rear genetically identical individuals from a variety of genetic backgrounds and rear them in the same environment, how much phenotypic variation between individuals of the same genotype would we see? Would different genetic backgrounds differ in their degree of variability? What would account for these differences? We used Drosophila inbred lines to address these questions focusing on variability in locomotor handedness. We show that different genotypes vary dramatically in their propensity for variability, that phenotypic variability itself, as a trait, can be heritable, and that loci affecting variability can be mapped. The genetic control of variability has received little attention in quantitative genetics despite the important role variability plays in explaining phenotypic variation between individuals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Our results also provide insight into mechanisms underlying individual differences in navigation behavior53,54.”
From Multimodal cue integration and learning in a neural representation of head direction (2025) · cites this paper as [53]
Citations
Cites
Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2017) · Evidence Based Journals · doi:10.1136/eb-2017-102845 · Cited by 6,799
SMITH, J. M., & PRICE, G. R. (1973) · Nature · doi:10.1038/246015a0 · Cited by 5,089 · cited 1×
“The nature of the forces influencing the evolution of alleles that affect variability has, more generally, been the focus of a rich theoretical literature explaining this phenomenon from a game theory perspective (36) or in terms of bet-hedging (37).”
BackgroundThe Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel
Mackay, T. F. C., Richards, S., Stone, E. A., Barbadilla, A., Ayroles, J. F., Zhu, D., Casillas, S., Han, Y., Magwire, M. M., Cridland, J. M., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10811 · Cited by 1,654 · cited 2×
“To that end, we performed an association study using a series of locusspecific mixed linear models (accounting for relatedness between lines and experimental block effect) and found 36 polymorphisms in 22 genes associated with variability in turning bias using a nominal P value (19, 21) of 5 × 10 (Fig.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationHsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation
Queitsch, C., Sangster, T. A., & Lindquist, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/news020506-13 · Cited by 1,422 · cited 2×
“Discussion In this study, we used a simple behavioral trait to show that individual genotypes vary considerably in their degree of intragenotypic variability (7, 15) and found that this variation is heritable.”
BackgroundMethodHeritable variation and evolution under favourable and unfavourable conditions.
Hoffmann, A., & Merilä, J. (1999) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01595-5 · Cited by 779 · cited 1×
“This scenario should be particularly favored in fluctuating environments (38, 39).”
BackgroundHuang, W., Massouras, A., Inoue, Y., Peiffer, J., Ràmia, M., Tarone, A. M., Turlapati, L., Zichner, T., Zhu, D., Lyman, R. F., et al. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.171546.113 · Cited by 661 · cited 4×
“The DGRP lines have been fully sequenced (19), allowing for genome-wide association mapping using the variability (i.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSeger, J. J., & Brockman, J. (1987) · doi:10.1007/0-306-48380-7_461 · Cited by 438 · cited 1×
“The nature of the forces influencing the evolution of alleles that affect variability has, more generally, been the focus of a rich theoretical literature explaining this phenomenon from a game theory perspective (36) or in terms of bet-hedging (37).”
The central complex and the genetic dissection of locomotor behaviour
Strauß, R. (2002) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00385-9 · Cited by 429 · cited 1×
“Within the central brain, Ten-a mutation causes midline fusion defects within the central complex), a brain structure implicated in sensory integration and locomotion (26).”
BackgroundFTO genotype is associated with phenotypic variability of body mass index
Yang, J., Loos, R. J. F., Powell, J. E., Medland, S. E., Speliotes, E. K., Chasman, D. I., Rose, L. M., Þorleifsson, G., Steinthórsdóttir, V., Mägi, R., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11401 · Cited by 418 · cited 1×
“Most recently, with the advent of genome-wide association studies, several groups (3, 4, 12, 13) have mapped quantitative trait loci affecting variance (vQTLs) by comparing phenotypic variances among individuals that share alleles.”
BackgroundEpistasis dominates the genetic architecture of Drosophila quantitative traits
Huang, W., Richards, S., Carbone, M. A., Zhu, D., Anholt, R. R. H., Ayroles, J. F., Duncan, L., Jordan, K. W., Lawrence, F., Magwire, M. M., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1213423109 · Cited by 355
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
7 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1554/04-550 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature749 · DOI · Paper page
- LT Hogben Nature and Murture (W.W. Norton Company, New York, 1933).
- 10.1080/01621459.1974.10482955 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1137/1.9780898718362 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–164 of 164
Jacobs, E. A. K., & Ryu, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1143391 · Cited by 8
“Such research has revealed that several behaviors, including turn bias during navigation in a Y-maze, overall activity, and turn regularity, show significant genetic control of variation (Ayroles et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialGuzman, R. M., Howard, Z. P., Liu, Z., Oliveira, R. D., Massa, A. T., Omsland, A., White, S. N., & Goodman, A. G. (2021) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab005 · Cited by 8
“These results suggest the need for rigor in that multiple methods should be employed when applicable for testing host survival or validating gene candidate (Ayroles et al., 2015).”
BackgroundReeves, R. G., & Tautz, D. (2017) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.117.039883 · Cited by 8
“This is in addition to potentially facilitat-ingexploringthepoorlyunderstood genetic basisof sexualdimorphism (Rawlik et al. 2016), and loci which impact the variance of traits [rather than their central values (Ayroles et al. 2015)].”
Disentangling variational bias: the roles of development, mutation and selection
Cai, H., Melo, D., & Marais, D. L. D. (2024) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2024.09.008 · Cited by 10
“…has often been referred to as intra-genotypic variability (Metcalf & Ayroles, 2020; Bradshaw, 1965) or phenotypic variability (Abley et al. , 2021; Ayroles et al. , 2015; Willmore et al. , 2007), which is thought to be an emergent by-product of the developmental processes (Willmore et al. , 2007).”
BackgroundKrama, T., Munkevics, M., Krams, R., Grigorjeva, T., Trakimas, G., Jõers, P., Popovs, S., Zants, K., Elferts, D., Rantala, M., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1189301 · Cited by 7
“Turn bias variability has a complex genetic architecture involving many genes, particularly those involved in circuit development during pupation, including specifically teneurin-A (Ayroles et al., 2015) that encodes a protein involved in synaptic partner matching (Mosca, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWhat can genetic association panels tell us about evolutionary processes in insects?
Robin, C., Battlay, P., & Fournier‐Level, A. (2018) · Current Opinion in Insect Science · doi:10.1016/j.cois.2018.12.004 · Cited by 6
Individuality across environmental context in Drosophila melanogasterPreprint
Mathejczyk, T. F., Knief, C., Haidar, M. A., Freitag, F., McClary, T., Wernet, M. F., & Linneweber, G. A. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.98171 · Cited by 2
“As expected from animal and human studies, the time frame of days had little effect on the behavioral outcome ( Bell et al., 2009 ; Buchanan et al., 2015 ; Linneweber et al., 2020 ; Mischel, 1968 ; Pantoja et al., 2016 ; Ross, 1977 ; Schuett et al., 2011 ).”
InfluentialRea, M., Kimmerer, G., Mittendorf, S., Xiong, X.-P., Green, M., Chandler, D. P., Saintilnord, W. N., Blackburn, J., Gao, T., & Fondufe-Mittendorf, Y. N. (2024) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123586 · Cited by 6
Flexible analysis of animal behavior via time-resolved manifold embeddingPreprint
York, R. A., Carreira-Rosario, A., Giocomo, L. M., & Clandinin, T. R. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.09.30.321406 · Cited by 13
“…repertoires, allowing researchers to better account for inborn variance or threshold effects in applications such as genetic mapping, behavioral manipulations, and neural perturbations (López-Alonso et al. 2014; Ayroles et al. 2015; Buchanan et al. 2015; Duistermars et al. 2018; Allen et al. 2015).”
BackgroundLearning is a fundamental source of individuality
Manna, R., Brea, J., Braga, G. N. V., Modirshanechi, A., Tomić, I., & Jakšić, A. M. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.08.30.610528 · Cited by 5
“This is not a contradiction: in accordance with previous studies, we find that genetics merely bounds behavioural expression across individuals Ayroles et al. ( 2015 ); Linneweber et al. ( 2020 ).”
InfluentialFrom heterogeneity to idiosyncrasy in the autistic brain
Lin, H., Breakspear, M. J., & Mottron, L. (2026) · Nature Mental Health · doi:10.1038/s44220-026-00601-z · Cited by 8
Playing dice with behavior: drivers of stochastic individuality.
Johnson, J., Sheehy, K., & Laskowski, K. L. (2025) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2025.10.003 · Cited by 5
Mean plant toxicity modulates the effects of plant defense variability
Pan, V., Gilbert, K. J., & Wetzel, W. (2025) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.70012 · Cited by 5
“Given recent work indicating that variation might be heritable (Ayroles et al., 2015; Herrera et al., 2022; Hill & Mulder, 2010; Jimenez-Gomez et al., 2011), selection for intraindividual trait variation is possible (Bruijning et al., 2020; Herrera, 2009; Metcalf & Ayroles, 2020), raising the…”
Schizophrenia: Developmental Variability Interacts with Risk Factors to Cause the Disorder
Szöke, A., Pignon, B., Boster, S., Jamain, S., & Schürhoff, F. (2020) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.202000038 · Cited by 8
Computational geometric tools for quantitative comparison of locomotory behavior
Stamps, M. T., Go, S., & Mathuru, A. S. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52300-8 · Cited by 4
Existence and implications of population variance structurePreprint
Musharoff, S. A., Park, D. S., Dahl, A. W., Galanter, J., Liu, X., Huntsman, S., Eng, C. S., Burchard, E. G., Ayroles, J. F., & Zaitlen, N. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/439661 · Cited by 6
Self-citationSignor, S. A., Arbeitman, M. N., & Nuzhdin, S. V. (2016) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1111/ede.12187 · Cited by 3
What makes each of us unique? The nine-banded armadillo as a model to study individuality
Leão, D. P., Duque, A., & Dietrich, M. O. (2024) · Frontiers in Mammal Science · doi:10.3389/fmamm.2024.1450655 · Cited by 4
“In inbred lines of fruit flies, for example, systematic assessment of spontaneous locomotor behavior revealed that some lines have consistently elevated levels of intragenotypic variability amongst individuals (Ayroles et al., 2015).”
Alexandre, C. M., Bubb, K., Schultz, K. M., Lempe, J., Cuperus, J., & Queitsch, C. (2023) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.05.11.540469 · Cited by 4
“…greater non-genetic variation (or less phenotypic robustness) than others (Waddington 1942; Whitlock and Fowler 1999; Ros et al. 2004; Hall et al. 2007; Hill et al. 2007; Ansel et al. 2008; Sangster et al. 2008; Shen et al. 2012; Ayroles et al. 2015; Morgante et al. 2015; Katsanos et al. 2017).”
Probabilistic axon targeting dynamics lead to individualized brain wiringPreprint
Andriatsilavo, M., Dumoulin, A., Dutta, S., Stoeckli, E., Hiesinger, P., & Hassan, B. A. (2022) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.08.26.505432 · Cited by 4
van Breugel, F. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.242267 · Cited by 5
Zhang, X.-B., & Qi, Y.-W. (2021) · Genomics · doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.04.009 · Cited by 4
Dynamical modeling of individual sensory reactivity and habituation learning
Boon, M., Smart, M., Persikov, A. V., van Reijmersdal, B., Maghbouli, M., Marmion, R. A., Carpenter, B., Shvartsman, S. Y., & Schenck, A. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2524738123 · Cited by 2
Drift in Individual Behavioral Phenotype as a Strategy for Unpredictable Worlds
Maloney, R., Ye, A. Q., Saint-Pre, S.-K., Alisch, T., Zimmerman, D. M., Pittoors, N., & de Bivort, B. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.09.05.611301 · Cited by 3
Kermany, N., Martin, J., & Careau, V. (2023) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-023-03365-z · Cited by 3
“Only three studies to date have quantified the heritability of predictability in behavioral traits such as locomotor handedness in Drosophila (Ayroles et al.”
BackgroundHeterosis of fitness and phenotypic variance in the evolution of a diploid gene regulatory network
Okubo, K., & Kaneko, K. (2022) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac097 · Cited by 3
Idiosyncratic learning performance in flies generalizes across modalitiesPreprint
Smith, M., Honegger, K. S., Turner, G. C., & de Bivort, B. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.01.23.427920 · Cited by 3
“Genetically identical Drosophila melanogaster flies display variability in their behaviors even when reared in identical environments [1–8] .”
BackgroundYang, E., Wang, G., Yang, J., Zhou, B., Tian, Y., & Cai, J. J. (2015) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/026393 · Cited by 2
“New studies show that phenotypic variance is genetically controlled, and the variance itself is a quantitative trait [2-13].”
BackgroundThe Genomic Kaleidoscope: On the Hidden Dimensions of Within-Species Genomic Diversity
Brasó‐Vives, M., Hartasánchez, D. A., Ayroles, J. F., Bucao, C. F., Furlan-Magaril, M., Majic, P., Pallares, L. F., Phipps-Tan, J., Rogers, T. F., Ruiz‐Herrera, A., et al. (2025) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaf204 · Cited by 2
Self-citationGenetic and environmental sources of behavioral individuality: a test of the standard model
Sweep, Z. J., Royauté, R., & Dochtermann, N. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.08.27.672710 · Cited by 2
Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits
(2025) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192898180.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Zhang, X., Yet, İ., Villicaña, S., Fernandez, J. C., Mangino, M., Hottenga, J., Tsai, P.-C., Min, J. L., Falchi, M., Wong, A., et al. (2026) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-026-03947-w · Cited by 2
“However, differences in trait variance across different genotype classes have been observed in multiple phenotypes, including in human disease [3, 4], animal and plant developmental traits [5–9], and phenotypic plasticity in changing environments [10–12].”
Kastner, D. B., Yokota, N. O., Lee, C. Y., Holobetz, C., Chaudhry, A., Williams, G., Ton, J., Mehra, M., Kharazia, V., Parkinson, D., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.02.26.582115 · Cited by 2
Stability of olfactory behavior syndromes in the Drosophila larva
Odell, S. R., Zito, N., Clark, D., & Mathew, D. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29523-x · Cited by 2
A novel assay to evaluate action selection in escape behavior
Goodman, D. P., Eldredge, A., & von Reyn, C. R. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.04.019 · Cited by 5
The Mighty Fruit Fly Moves into Outbred Genetics
Birney, E. (2016) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1006388 · Cited by 2
Crall, J. D., & Gaiarsa, M. P. (2026) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.70300 · Cited by 1
“…ubiquity (Bolnick et al. , 2003; Des Roches et al. , 2018; Sih et al. , 2004)—arising even in the absence of genotypic or environmental variation (Ayroles et al. , 2015; de Bivort, 2025)— and impact on ecological and evolutionary processes (Cantwell-Jones et al. , 2024; Gamelon et al. , 2025;…”
Fornoni, J., Ramos, S., Álvarez-Martínez, R., Cordero, C., & Domínguez, C. A. (2026) · Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2025.0180 · Cited by 1
Beyond Diffusion: Bayesian Learning Strategies in Single-Cell Life
Knafo, M., Casacuberta, E., & Ruiz‐Trillo, I. (2026) · PRX Life · doi:10.1103/5p5z-t8qy
“This can obscure the expressed phenotypic diversity and latent adaptive potential carried by a genotype [16–18].”
Linking physiology to behavioral individuality in Drosophila melanogaster: Methods and Mechanisms
Chan, C., Huang, S., & Chan, C. (2026) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2026.115267 · Cited by 1
Intergenerational effects of dietary changes on trait means and variance
Lee, M., Tran, K., Castillo, Y., & Walsh, M. R. (2025) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2025.0310 · Cited by 1
“Moreover, trait variance itself has been shown to be evolvable [12–14], further underscoring its potential evolutionary significance [15].”
Family-based selection: an efficient method for increasing phenotypic variability
Lall, S., Milton, C., & de Bivort, B. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkaf165 · Cited by 1
“Evidence that variability of a trait is under gen - etic control (and therefore heritable) is mounting, with empirical studies of morphology (Dworkin and Gibson 2006; Debat et al. 2009; Turner et al. 2011) and behavior (Turner et al. 2013; Ayroles et al. 2015) supporting this.”
InfluentialMin, J., Vishnyakova, O., Brooks-Wilson, A., & Elliott, L. (2025) · J. Comput. Biol. · doi:10.1089/cmb.2024.0563 · Cited by 1
“Variance association studies have shown that some biomarkers affect the variability of traits (Ayroles et al., 2015; Nachman et al., 2003; Queitsch et al., 2002; Dumitrascu et al., 2019), and therefore in fl uence homeostasis.”
Okubo, K., & Kaneko, K. (2022) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac9549 · Cited by 1
Alisch, T., Crall, J. D., Zucker, D., & de Bivort, B. (2017) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/239459 · Cited by 1
“…of these toolkits, screen experiments quantify the phenotypes of hundreds (Vitaterna et al., 1994), thousands (Kain et al., 2012), tens of thousands (Ayroles et al., 2015; Buchanan et al., 2015; Churgin et al., 2017) or even hundreds of thousands of individual animals (Robie et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialConley, D., Johnson, R., Domingue, B. W., Dawes, C. T., Boardman, J. D., & Siegal, M. L. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/175596 · Cited by 1
End-to-end automation of behavioural experiments with a collaborative robot
Manna, R., Štampar, T., Tomić, I., & Jakšić, A. M. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.10.20.758951
“The control of technical variation associated to animal handling is particularly relevant in studies of individual behaviour 1,5–7 , where variation in handling can translate into the measured inter-individual variation.”
Walasek, N., Bruijning, M., Panchanathan, K., & Frankenhuis, W. E. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.05.15.725332
“Crucially, different genotypes of the same species can still differ in how much and what kind of stochastic variation they show [3,44,45].”
Kutscher, D., Keller, R., Kirsch, A., Pei, F., & Nayebi, A. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.10.26.761878
“Because each skill is held fixed throughout a training or evaluation episode, we interpret it as a persistent exploratory strategy consistent with the locomotor handedness observed in individual flies (Buchanan et al., 2015; Ayroles et al., 2015; de Bivort et al., 2022).”
Hebbian learning generates individuality in spatial decision-makingPreprint
Salahshour, M., & Couzin, I. D. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.10.12.758645
“Such variation shapes how populations respond to change and how their social structure forms [3, 11], yet how developmental noise becomes individual differences in decision-making is un-resolved at a mechanistic level [7, 12, 13].”
Fanara, J. J., & Carreira, V. P. (2026) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1111/eea.70129
Drift in individual behavioral phenotype as a strategy for unpredictable worlds
Maloney, R., Ye, A. Q., Saint-Pre, S.-K., Alisch, T., Zimmerman, D. M., Pittoors, N., & de Bivort, B. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.103585
“Using a Y-maze assay ( Figure 1D ) that measures left-right choices that correlate with locomotor handedness in circling ( Buchanan et al., 2015 ), we measured the loco-motor handedness of flies in each of these lines three times weekly for 3 weeks.”
InfluentialChrzanowska, A., & Hassan, B. A. (2026) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2026.103203
Individualized decision-making driven by long-term memory retrieval in Drosophila
Feng, K.-L., Wu, M.-C., Charng, C.-C., Chou, C.-Y., Weng, J., & Chiang, A. (2026) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2026.117139
Kolbjonoks, V., Popovs, S., Krams, R., Trakimas, G., Munkevics, M., Krama, T., Rantala, M. J., Contreras-Garduño, J., de Souza, A. D., Adams, C. B., et al. (2025) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology15010051
Pozeilov, H., Dayan, E., Yehuda, R., Levi, M., Shohat-Ophir, G., & Forkosh, O. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.11.19.689229
“High-368 throughput tracking revealed sparse but significant trait covariances that populate a multidimensional personality space, with the magnitude of intragenotypic variability modulated by genotype, behavioral domain, and environmental complexity (66, 86 – 88).”
Krams, I., Kolbjonoks, V., Popovs, S., Munkevics, M., Krams, R., Trakimas, G., Rantala, M., Contreras-Garduño, J., Jõers, P., Adams, C. B., et al. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15111782
Mean and variance heterogeneity loci impact kernel compositional traits in maize
Ismail, Y. A., Mujjabi, C., Olatoye, M. O., Gray, S., Lipka, A. E., & Bohn, M. O. (2025) · The Plant Genome · doi:10.1002/tpg2.70131
“Many studies have reported vQTL associated with diverse phenotypes in Drosophila (Ayroles et al., 2015; Mackay & Lyman, 2005), in mice (Corty et al., 2018; Nachman et al., 2003), and in humans (Topless et al., 2015; Wei et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2012; Young et al., 2018).”
A neural correlate of individual odor preference in DrosophilaPreprint
Churgin, M. A., Lavrentovich, D. O., Smith, M. A., Gao, R., Boyden, E. S., & de Bivort, B. L. (2023) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.90511 · Cited by 21
“…studied for phototactic preference ( Kain et al., 2012 ), temperature preference ( Kain et al., 2015 ), locomotor handedness ( Ayroles et al., 2015 ; Buchanan et al., 2015 ; de Bivort et al., 2022 ), object-fixated walking ( Linneweber et al., 2020 ), and odor preference ( Honegger et al., 2020 ).”
Alexandre, C. M., Bubb, K. L., Schultz, K., Lempe, J., Cuperus, J. T., & Queitsch, C. (2023) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.19334 · Cited by 4
“…showing greater nongenetic variation (or less phenotypic robustness) than others (Waddington, 1942; Whitlock & Fowler, 1999; Ros et al ., 2004; Hall et al ., 2007; Hill et al ., 2007; Ansel et al ., 2008; Sangster et al ., 2008; Shen et al ., 2012; Ayroles et al ., 2015; Kat-sanos et al ., 2017).”
Spierer, A., & Rand, D. (2021) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2021.06.03.446923
The Genetic Architecture of Robustness for Flight Performance in DrosophilaPreprint
Spierer, A. N., & Rand, D. M. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.04.412395 · Cited by 2
“In doing so, they drive repeatable non-genetic phenotypic variation in behavioral responses to serve as a bet hedging strategy (Vogt et al. 2008; Ayroles et al. 2015; Hiesinger and Hassan 2018; Honegger and de Bivort 2018).”
BackgroundMethodMelo, D. (2019) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.41.2019.tde-04062019-130253
Ibrahim, H. A. E., Sabit, H., Abushady, A., Elmetwaly, H., Abdelsalam, A., & El-Seoudy, A. A. (2018) · doi:10.21608/ejgc.2018.9503
“…in methylation levels (p = 0.02), Minor methylation levels were obtained for samples S1, S2, S12 and S16 which might reflect individual variation between animals as they were exposed primarily to the same climate atmosphere (Bossdorf et al., 2005; Novak and Mack, 2005; Ayroles et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayroles, J. F., Buchanan, S. M., O’Leary, C., Skutt-Kakaria, K., Grenier, J. K., Clark, A. G., Hartl, D. L., & de Bivort, B. L.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2015-05-07
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 6706-6711
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC4450409
- OpenAlex
- W2112316313
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI064950)
- Society of Fellows, Harvard University (N/A)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- phenotypic variability, central complex, brain gene expression, genotype-phenotype correlation, alternative alleles
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Inbreeding, Locomotion, Male, Phenotype, Receptors, Cell Surface, Genetic Variation, Genes, Insect, Drosophila Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, RNA Interference, Quantitative Trait Loci, Genome-Wide Association Study, Gene Knockdown Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review