Cited by 661

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines

Huang, Wen, Massouras, Andreas, Inoue, Yutaka, Peiffer, Jason, Ràmia, Miquel, Tarone, Aaron M., Turlapati, Lavanya, Zichner, Thomas, Zhu, Dianhui, Lyman, Richard F., Magwire, Michael M., Blankenburg, Kerstin, Carbone, Mary Anna, Chang, Kyle, Ellis, Lisa L., Fernandez, Sonia, Han, Yi, Highnam, Gareth, Hjelmen, Carl E., Jack, John R., Javaid, Mehwish, Jayaseelan, Joy, Kalra, Divya, Lee, Sandy, Lewis, Lora, Munidasa, Mala, Ongeri, Fiona, Patel, Shohba, Perales, Lora, Perez, Agapito, Pu, LingLing, Rollmann, Stephanie M., Ruth, Robert, Saada, Nehad, Warner, Crystal, Williams, Aneisa, Wu, Yuan-Qing, Yamamoto, Akihiko, Zhang, Yiqing, Zhu, Yiming, Anholt, Robert R.H., Korbel, Jan O., Mittelman, David, Muzny, Donna M., Gibbs, Richard A., Barbadilla, Antonio, Johnston, J. Spencer, Stone, Eric A., Richards, Stephen, Deplancke, Bart, Mackay, Trudy F.C.·2014·Genome Research

Abstract

The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) is a community resource of 205 sequenced inbred lines, derived to improve our understanding of the effects of naturally occurring genetic variation on molecular and organismal phenotypes. We used an integrated genotyping strategy to identify 4,853,802 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 1,296,080 non-SNP variants. Our molecular population genomic analyses show higher deletion than insertion mutation rates and stronger purifying selection on deletions. Weaker selection on insertions than deletions is consistent with our observed distribution of genome size determined by flow cytometry, which is skewed toward larger genomes. Insertion/deletion and single nucleotide polymorphisms are positively correlated with each other and with local recombination, suggesting that their nonrandom distributions are due to hitchhiking and background selection. Our cytogenetic analysis identified 16 polymorphic inversions in the DGRP. Common inverted and standard karyotypes are genetically divergent and account for most of the variation in relatedness among the DGRP lines. Intriguingly, variation in genome size and many quantitative traits are significantly associated with inversions. Approximately 50% of the DGRP lines are infected with Wolbachia, and four lines have germline insertions of Wolbachia sequences, but effects of Wolbachia infection on quantitative traits are rarely significant. The DGRP complements ongoing efforts to functionally annotate the Drosophila genome. Indeed, 15% of all D. melanogaster genes segregate for potentially damaged proteins in the DGRP, and genome-wide analyses of quantitative traits identify novel candidate genes. The DGRP lines, sequence data, genotypes, quality scores, phenotypes, and analysis and visualization tools are publicly available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.171546.113

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) consists of 205 inbred genomes, unrelated to the 16 strains used to construct the pangenome.

    “The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) consists of 205 inbred genomes 34 , unrelated to the 16 strains used to construct the pangenome.”
  • Due to the high inbreeding of the DGRP samples, only a small fraction of variants are expected to truly be segregating.

    “Due to the high inbreeding of these samples, we expect only a small fraction of variants to truly be segregating 34 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 83

  1. 10.1101/gr.114876.110 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1017/S0016672301004955 · DOI
  3. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002508 · DOI
  4. 10.1214/09-STS307 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/ng.332 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/356519a0 · DOI
  7. 10.1534/genetics.104.026427 · DOI
  8. 10.1534/genetics.111.126995 · DOI
  9. 1998, Cloning and characterization of a gene encoding the major surface protein of the bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis, J Bacteriol, 180, 2373, 10.1128/JB.180.9.2373-2378.1998 · DOI
  10. 1935, Salivary chromosome maps with a key to the banding of the chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster, J Hered, 26, 60
  11. 1993, The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation, Genetics, 134, 1289, 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289 · DOI
  12. 10.4161/fly.19695 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002905 · DOI
  14. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003056 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/ng.806 · DOI
  16. Dobzhansky T . 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.
  17. 10.1126/science.1142490 · DOI
  18. Ellis LL , Huang W , Quinn AM , Ahuja A , Alfrejd B , Gomez FE , Hjelmen CE , Moore CL , Mackay TFC , Johnston JS , . 2014. Intrapopulation genome size variation in D. melanogaster reflects life history variation and plasticity. PLoS Genet (in press). · DOI
  19. Falconer DS , Mackay TFC . 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th ed. Addison Wesley Longman, Harlow, United Kingdom.
  20. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.009 · DOI
  21. 10.1101/gr.086660.108 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/nar/gkh053 · DOI
  23. 2010, Multiple reference genomes and transcriptomes for Arabidopsis thaliana, Nature, 477, 419
  24. 10.1159/000288704 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/ng.768 · DOI
  26. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-281 · DOI
  27. 2011, Genome size determination using flow cytometry of propidium iodide-stained nuclei, Methods Mol Biol, 772, 3
  28. 10.1017/S0016672300010156 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/nrg3098 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173532 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/2408456 · DOI
  32. 10.1101/gr.141689.112 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.1213423109 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038722 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/gbe/evt051 · DOI
  36. 1993, Lateral transfer in natural populations of eukaryotes, Annu Rev Genet, 27, 236
  37. 10.1534/genetics.105.047985 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.06.007 · DOI
  39. 10.1186/1471-2164-14-476 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/nmeth.1681 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1038/ng.2678 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/nrg3627 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/nrg2612 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/nature10811 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/nar/gks1024 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/nmeth.f.308 · DOI
  49. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003055 · DOI
  50. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000622 · DOI
  51. 10.1101/gr.107524.110 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1093/nar/gkr1030 · DOI
  53. 10.1101/gr.106344.110 · DOI
  54. 1977, Inversion clines in populations of Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, 87, 169, 10.1093/genetics/87.1.169 · DOI
  55. 10.1126/science.1198374 · DOI
  56. 10.1101/gr.148718.112 · DOI
  57. 1997, Recombination and gene flux caused by gene conversion and crossing over in inversion heterokaryotypes, Genetics, 146, 695, 10.1093/genetics/146.2.695 · DOI
  58. 2000, Effect of inversion polymorphism on the neutral nucleotide variability of linked chromosomal regions in Drosophila, Genetics, 155, 685, 10.1093/genetics/155.2.685 · DOI
  59. Nei M . 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York. · DOI
  60. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002685 · DOI
  61. 10.1534/genetics.104.037689 · DOI
  62. 10.1002/bies.201100075 · DOI
  63. 2002, Mutational equilibrium model of genome size evolution, Theor Popul Biol, 61, 533
  64. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts378 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02024-2 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003129 · DOI
  67. 10.1038/nature03062 · DOI
  68. 10.1101/gr.096388.109 · DOI
  69. 1976, Chromosome studies in wild populations of Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, 82, 323, 10.1093/genetics/82.2.323 · DOI
  70. 10.1101/gr.129122.111 · DOI
  71. 10.1073/pnas.1220168110 · DOI
  72. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000002 · DOI
  73. 10.1038/nature07175 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/0040-5809(84)90017-0 · DOI
  75. 10.1038/emboj.2011.135 · DOI
  76. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000988 · DOI
  77. 10.1371/journal.pone.0034745 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.05.002 · DOI
  79. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.05.029 · DOI
  80. 10.1017/S0016672309990279 · DOI
  81. 10.1073/pnas.0704219104 · DOI
  82. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp394 · DOI
  83. 10.1101/gr.142646.112 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Huang, W., Massouras, A., Inoue, Y., Peiffer, J., Ràmia, M., Tarone, A. M., Turlapati, L., Zichner, T., Zhu, D., Lyman, R. F., Magwire, M. M., Blankenburg, K., Carbone, M. A., Chang, K., Ellis, L. L., Fernandez, S., Han, Y., Highnam, G., Hjelmen, C. E., Jack, J. R., Javaid, M., Jayaseelan, J., Kalra, D., Lee, S., Lewis, L., Munidasa, M., Ongeri, F., Patel, S., Perales, L., Perez, A., Pu, L., Rollmann, S. M., Ruth, R., Saada, N., Warner, C., Williams, A., Wu, Y.-Q., Yamamoto, A., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y., Anholt, R. R. H., Korbel, J. O., Mittelman, D., Muzny, D. M., Gibbs, R. A., Barbadilla, A., Johnston, J. S., Stone, E. A., Richards, S., Deplancke, B., & Mackay, T. F. C.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2014-04-08
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
1193-1208
ISSN
1088-9051
Cited by
661
References
10
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review