Cited by 176T-cell and B-cell ImmunologyCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Instability of Helios-deficient Tregs is associated with conversion to a T-effector phenotype and enhanced antitumor immunity

Open access
Nakagawa, Hidetoshi, Sido, Jessica M., Reyes, Edwin E., Kiers, Valerie, Cantor, Harvey, Kim, Hye-Jung·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Depletion or inhibition of regulatory T cells (Tregs) has been associated with increased effector T-cell activation that may enhance antitumor responses. A potentially more effective strategy depends on induction of lineage instability that allows conversion of intratumoral but not systemic Tregs into effector T cells (Teffs). We show that targeted deletion of the Helios transcription factor within CD4 Tregs promotes instability and effector cell conversion of Tregs in tumors and increased antitumor immunity. Ab-dependent ligation of Treg surface receptors that diminishes Helios expression can also induce intratumoral Treg conversion. These findings indicate that targeting of signaling pathways that reduce Helios expression by intratumoral Tregs may represent a potentially robust approach to cancer immunotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1604765113

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Loss of IKZF2 can shift TRegs toward a pro-inflammatory state such that they secrete IL-2 and IFN-γ and behave like tumor-fighting Teff-like cells.

    “However, its loss can shift tRegs toward a pro-inflammatory state such they secrete il-2 and iFN-γ and behave like tumor-fighting teff-like cells (Kim et al. 2015;Nakagawa et al. 2016).”

    From From serendipity to strategy: molecular glue degraders in cancer therapeutics (2025) · cites this paper as Nakagawa et al. 2016

    The Results report that Helios-deficient intratumoral Tregs produce IFN-γ, convert toward a Teff phenotype, and are associated with enhanced antitumor immunity. They do not report that these Tregs secrete IL-2; the Discussion instead describes defective IL-2 responses. The observed conversion is principally within tumors, not systemic Tregs. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Helios is critical for maintaining identity and suppressive activity of Tregs, and mouse models with Helios-deficient Treg cells show enhanced antitumor immunity.

    “Helios is critical for maintaining the identity and suppressive activity of Tregs, and mouse models with Helios-deficient Treg cells have shown enhanced antitumor immunity.168”

    From Chasing molecular glue degraders: screening approaches (2022) · cites this paper as [168]

  • Helios is critical for maintaining the identity, anergic phenotype, and suppressive activity of regulatory T cells.

    “The zinc finger transcription factor Helios is critical for maintaining the identity, anergic phenotype, and suppressive activity of regulatory T cells.”
  • Acute pharmacological degradation of Helios recapitulates the phenotype of genetic loss of Ikzf2 in Tregs.

    “Notably, the preferential Helios degrader ALV2 destabilized the anergic phenotype of regulatory Tregs, consistent with previously reported phenotypes of Ikzf2−/− Tregs5,6,29, demonstrating that acute pharmacological degradation of Helios recapitulates the phenotype of genetic loss of Ikzf2 in Tregs.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakagawa, H., Sido, J. M., Reyes, E. E., Kiers, V., Cantor, H., & Kim, H.-J.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-05-16
Volume
113
Issue
22
Pages
6248-6253
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2401985889
Cited by
176
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7
FWCI
10.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (RO1AI037562)
  • The LeRoy Schecter Research Foundation (n/a)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
Helios, regulatory T cells, antitumor immunity, tumor microenvironment, Foxp3, inflammatory cytokines, CD4+ T cells, cancer immunotherapy
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, T-Lymphocytes, Helper-Inducer, Melanoma, Experimental, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, Transcription Factors, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Mice, Knockout, T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review