Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FoxO3 regulates neuronal reprogramming of cells from postnatal and aging mice

Ahlenius, Henrik, Chanda, Soham, Webb, Ashley E., Yousif, Issa, Karmazin, Jesse, Prusiner, Stanley B., Brunet, Anne, Südhof, Thomas C., Wernig, Marius·2016·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Direct reprogramming of nonneuronal cells into induced neuronal (iN) cells has been of great interest for its potential applications in neurological disease modeling. Although this approach is well-established using cells from embryonic and neonatal animals, its applicability for cells from adult and aged animals has remained unexplored. This study demonstrates that iN cells can be efficiently generated from aging animals, but that age-dependent roadblocks which depend on the transcription factor FoxO3 affect the reprogramming efficiency and functional maturation of iN cell properties. Eliminating these roadblocks may be useful for modeling age-related neurological disorders using iN cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1607079113

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Partial de-differentiation is necessary for rejuvenation to occur.

    “emphasizing the necessity of partial de-differentiation for rejuvenation (Box 1) to occur [22][23][24][25] .”

    From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Developmental Stage section reports direct conversion of fibroblasts from aged mice into neurons, and the Discussion addresses how age affects reprogramming. Neither section addresses rejuvenation or establishes that partial de-differentiation is necessary for it (searched: partial de-differentiation, rejuvenation, and age-associated characteristics). (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Aging-associated DNA methylation patterns and biomarkers persisted when cells were transdifferentiated to different cell types.

    “Conversely, other works have shown that aging-associated DNA methylation patterns and biomarkers persisted when cells were transdifferentiated (Box 1) to different cell types, emphasizing the necessity of partial de-differentiation for rejuvenation (Box 1) to occur [22][23][24][25] .”

    From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [22]

    The section “Several Aging-Associated Cellular Features Correlate with Reduced Reprogrammability” reports senescence markers in donor fibroblasts, while “Developmental Stage but Not Adult Aging Impairs iN Cell Reprogramming” reports their conversion into neurons. Neither section establishes that aging biomarkers persisted after conversion. Searches for DNA methylation patterns, epigenetic age, and retained markers found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1038/nature08797 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.stem.2011.09.002 · DOI
  3. 10.1093/jmcb/mjq044 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.stem.2011.07.002 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nature10323 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1038/nature10284 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1105135108 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1316240110 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nature08290 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nature09342 · DOI
  11. 10.1371/currents.RRN1274 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2014.05.020 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.028 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.09.013 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/nature08980 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.stem.2009.09.014 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/82868 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6003-08.2009 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.049 · DOI
  20. 10.1002/jemt.10213 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1086336 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.10.009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ahlenius, H., Chanda, S., Webb, A. E., Yousif, I., Karmazin, J., Prusiner, S. B., Brunet, A., Südhof, T. C., & Wernig, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2016-07-11
Volume
113
Issue
30
Pages
8514-8519
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
26
References
4
Language
en
Funders
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute on Aging (AG010770-18A1)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH092931)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review