Cited by 968Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchEpigenetics and DNA MethylationTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence

The Ink4/Arf locus is a barrier for iPS cell reprogramming

Open access
Li, Han, Collado, Manuel, Villasante, Aranzazu, Strati, Katerina, Ortega, Sagrario, Cañamero, Marta, Blasco, Maria A., Serrano, Manuel·2009·Nature

Abstract

The mechanisms involved in the reprogramming of differentiated cells into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by the three transcription factors Oct4 (also known as Pou5f1), Klf4 and Sox2 remain poorly understood. The Ink4/Arf locus comprises the Cdkn2a-Cdkn2b genes encoding three potent tumour suppressors, namely p16(Ink4a), p19(Arf) and p15(Ink4b), which are basally expressed in differentiated cells and upregulated by aberrant mitogenic signals. Here we show that the locus is completely silenced in iPS cells, as well as in embryonic stem (ES) cells, acquiring the epigenetic marks of a bivalent chromatin domain, and retaining the ability to be reactivated after differentiation. Cell culture conditions during reprogramming enhance the expression of the Ink4/Arf locus, further highlighting the importance of silencing the locus to allow proliferation and reprogramming. Indeed, the three factors together repress the Ink4/Arf locus soon after their expression and concomitant with the appearance of the first molecular markers of 'stemness'. This downregulation also occurs in cells carrying the oncoprotein large-T, which functionally inactivates the pathways regulated by the Ink4/Arf locus, thus indicating that the silencing of the locus is intrinsic to reprogramming and not the result of a selective process. Genetic inhibition of the Ink4/Arf locus has a profound positive effect on the efficiency of iPS cell generation, increasing both the kinetics of reprogramming and the number of emerging iPS cell colonies. In murine cells, Arf, rather than Ink4a, is the main barrier to reprogramming by activation of p53 (encoded by Trp53) and p21 (encoded by Cdkn1a); whereas, in human fibroblasts, INK4a is more important than ARF. Furthermore, organismal ageing upregulates the Ink4/Arf locus and, accordingly, reprogramming is less efficient in cells from old organisms, but this defect can be rescued by inhibiting the locus with a short hairpin RNA. All together, we conclude that the silencing of Ink4/Arf locus is rate-limiting for reprogramming, and its transient inhibition may significantly improve the generation of iPS cells.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature08290

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro, cellular senescence is a potent cell-autonomous barrier to OSKM transcription factor-mediated reprogramming, similar to its tumour suppressor role.

    “In vitro studies demonstrated that cellular senescence is a potent cell-autonomous barrier for transcription factor-mediated reprograming using OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and MYC (commonly referred to as OSKM), in a manner similar to its role in tumour suppression181–183.”

    From Cellular senescence in ageing: from mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities (2021) · cites this paper as [183]

    The paper’s main text (indexed under Abstract; page unavailable) reports that loss of Ink4a/Arf improves reprogramming, including when c-Myc is added to Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4. Its concluding passage draws a parallel between the locus’s roles as a barrier to malignancy and to de-differentiation. The experiments establish a barrier involving this senescence-associated locus, but do not directly demonstrate that cellular senescence itself is the cell-autonomous barrier claimed. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, H., Collado, M., Villasante, A., Strati, K., Ortega, S., Cañamero, M., Blasco, M. A., & Serrano, M.
Affiliations
Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (ES)
Corresponding author
Serrano, Manuel
Venue
Nature
Published
2009-08
Volume
460
Issue
7259
Pages
1136-1139
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2076047032
Cited by
968
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 68 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 104 · 2012: 114
FWCI
51.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Keywords
INK4/ARF locus, induced pluripotent stem cells, cellular reprogramming, p16INK4a, CDKN2B, p19ARF, CDKN2A, tumor suppressor, aging, Oct4, KLF4, SOX2, large T antigen, epigenetic silencing
MeSH terms
Kruppel-Like Factor 4, Aging, Animals, Cell Count, Cell Differentiation, Fibroblasts, Humans, Kinetics, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Keratinocytes, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16, Gene Silencing, Pluripotent Stem Cells, Epigenesis, Genetic, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review