Cited by 429Higher Education Research StudiesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and Diversity

Improving Student Outcomes in Higher Education: The Science of Targeted Intervention

Open access
Harackiewicz, Judith M., Priniski, Stacy J.·2018·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

Many theoretically based interventions have been developed over the past two decades to improve educational outcomes in higher education. Based in social-psychological and motivation theories, well-crafted interventions have proven remarkably effective because they target specific educational problems and the processes that underlie them. In this review, we evaluate the current state of the literature on targeted interventions in higher education with an eye to emerging theoretical and conceptual questions about intervention science. We review three types of interventions, which focus on the value students perceive in academic tasks, their framing of academic challenges, and their personal values, respectively. We consider interventions that (a) target academic outcomes (e.g., grades, major or career plans, course taking, retention) in higher education, as well as the pipeline to college, and (b) have been evaluated in at least two studies. Finally, we discuss implications for intervention science moving forward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011725

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior literature identifies belonging as a factor associated with recruitment and retention efforts of UR groups in healthcare and as relevant to students' navigation of adversity, low confidence in academic abilities, or being new to a previously unfamiliar space such as a college campus.

    “Prior literature identifies belonging as a factor associated with recruitment and retention efforts of UR groups in healthcare (Fleming et al., 2022) and as relevant to students' navigation of adversity, low confidence in academic abilities, or being new to a previously unfamiliar space such as a college campus (Harackiewicz & Priniski, 2018).”

    From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Harackiewicz & Priniski, 2018

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Utility value interventions help students see the relevance of education to their lives by encouraging them to identify the value of the content of a given field of study to them and their lives.

    “Utility value interventions help students see the relevance of education to their lives by encouraging them to identify the value of the content of a given field of study to them and their lives”

    From Tackling Educational Inequalities with Social Psychology: Identities, Contexts, and Interventions (2021) · cites this paper as Harackiewicz & Priniski, 2018

  • In high-stakes environments, academic coaching can improve outcomes by helping students manage large volumes of information and the emotional demands of clinical experiences.

    “In these high–stakes environments, academic coaching can improve outcomes by helping students manage large volumes of information and the emotional demands of clinical experiences [1].”

    From Exploring the impact of academic coaching interventions on student outcomes in graduate healthcare and medical education: a systematic scoping review. (2025) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction and Three Types of Interventions sections discuss targeted psychological interventions that can improve college outcomes, but they do not address academic coaching in clinical training. Searches for coaching, clinical experiences, information volume, and emotional demands found no passage supporting the claimed mechanism or setting (page numbers unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Eccles J, Adler T, Futterman R, Goff S, Kaczala C, Meece J. 1983 Expectations, values and academic behaviors. In Perspective on Achievement and Achievement Motivation, ed. Spence JT, pp. 75– 146. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harackiewicz, J. M., & Priniski, S. J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Priniski, Stacy J.
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2018-01-04
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
409-435
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2612819889
Cited by
429
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Institute of Education Sciences
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM102703)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
targeted interventions, higher education, student outcomes, motivation theories, social-psychological intervention, personal values, educational outcomes, student retention, intervention research
MeSH terms
Academic Success, Educational Measurement, Humans, Motivation, Students, Early Intervention, Educational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review